Jump to content

1564402927_Comet2021Banner.jpg.a8d9e102cd65f969b635e8061096d211.jpg

About to take the plunge with..........


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I'm a beginner and this is my first post on this forum so be gentle please.

I've been lurking in the sidelines for a while and have been keenly researching prior to taking the plunge and buying my first telescope. With my budget (£700 for scope and mount) and viewing intentions I'm going to go for the Skywatcher Explorer 200P EQ5 Pro Synscan Goto. I have been flip-flopping between the normal EQ5 and the Goto version for a while and have finally come to the decision that, as my intention is to do some astrophotograhy that the goto mount would be a good idea. Does anyone have any experience with this combination of scope and mount? And, also I'd be interested in other peoples opinions on my choice of hardware good or bad??

I live in a fairly light polluted area (Milton Keynes) but my girlfriend lives in north Norfolk which has dark skies so I'm planning to take the scope up there a lot of the time (Plus she has a garden which would be useful!)

Anyway, I just thought I'd introduce myself and let you know my plans before I finally take the plunge into the world of astronomy.

Clear skies!

Ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome Ed.

Have to say I have only been here for a few days myself.

Everyone is soo friendly.

As you can see from my first posts I am also thinking about going for that scope.

Good luck and enjoy your stay :D

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

welcome edf, still a noob myself but in my first six months i changed from a eq2 mount to a full goto very pleased with it for photography,off for my first attempt at saturn now.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The eq5 is capable of photography but you are at the top end of its weight limit a slightly smaller scope will give you a little more wriggle room for photography, (won't be as good visually however) you really would be better with a eq6 for photograhy with a 200p as its quite a heavy scope or this one might work better for photography with an eq5

Reflectors - Skywatcher Explorer 150P DS OTA

forgot to say welcome to sgl

Edited by rowan46
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the forum.

I agree with Rowan above the EQ5 is at it's weight limit with the 200P, I bought the 200P with EQ5 and dual axis motors (not Synscan). I found it excellent visually and having the lack of GOTO meant I got to learn the sky a bit.

I have dabbled a bit with a astrophotography and got some acceptable results but found the EQ5 struggled a bit. I have since bought the EQ6 Synscan which is a bit of a beast which you will have to bare in mind if you want to transport the whole lot regularly to a dark site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking at the same scope but on the HEQ5 Pro mount. Unfortunately, there are no Skywatcher Explorer 200P in the country at the moment. Most of the retailers I have spoken to are saying it will be the end of the month until they are back in stock. So you've got a few more weeks to agonise over your decision as I have been doing for the past month :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the '5' mounts will be pushed with an 8 inch Newt for imaging.

In imaging GoTo has advantages you may not have thought of.

-It is perfectly possible, even commonplace, to image objects invisible in the eyepiece because they are too diiffuse and faint. These two, for instance, are effectively invisible;

http://ollypenrice.smugmug.com/Photography/Widefield-images-including/IC-1396-HARGB-2-3X1-HRS/936701075_jhrMy-X3.jpg

http://ollypenrice.smugmug.com/Photography/Widefield-images-including/SIMEIS-147-HArgb/1182345194_8j8Pv-X3.jpg

-Time is terribly precious. Searching is a waste.

-Removing the camera is bad news. You lose focus, framing and flats. Not what you want at all!

-Recovery from problems like lost guide star etc is so much faster.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ed. Welcome to SGL.

I echo the commernts about photogrpahy and the EQ5 with an 8".

I work on the basis of DSLR straight down the focus tube (FL1000) will allow 30sec max exposure before you get trails. Bright objects like M42, M45 are fine in these times. But you won't be long before you want to 'go dimmer'.

So for scope photography, as said previously, you are looking at a smaller scope on the EQ5, or a larger mount. Mounts get heavy and expensive.

A DSLR with a half decent lens of any FL from 20mm to 250mm on the EQ5 will give stunning pictures from a dark sky, within reasonable time limits. Old manual M42 thread lenses are often unwanted cheap items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ed, Welcome to SGL :D

For astro-photography you'll find the book Making Every Photon Count (by SGL's very own steppenwolf & now onto it's 2nd Edition) helpful in getting started. Easy to read, it's full of advice aimed at the imaging novice, including choosing the right equipment, tips 'n' tricks and lots of other vital stuff.

The imaging section, too, is full of experienced, talented folk who, I'm sure, will be more than happy to share advice and guidance with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow,

Thank you very much for all your welcoming words and the advice already given. To my girlfriends bemusement I've been flirting with the idea of getting a larger mount. I've got to say that I've been looking at the HEQ5 not the EQ6 becauase they do seem to increase in price quite dranatically with size. I was surprised to see the HEQ5 Pro synscan on a website in the past week for only £540. I immediately emailed the shop who quickly came back and told me that it was no longer available and would be removed from the site. I thought it was too good to be true.

Unfortuately my budget is limited to a maximum of £700 all in so I'm not sure if can stretch to a HEQ5 manual mount. I'll have a look around. If i can then I could buy this with the intention to upgrade it later. On this note, I was wondering whether the EQ5 or HEQ5 with upgrade kit is identical to the Pro synscan bought off the shelf? If not what are the differences?

Anyway thanks again for all your advice and welcomes

Ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.