Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

Recommended Posts

John

I use a scale of 1-5.

Transparency is straight forward. My usual Zentih Limiting Magnitude (ZLM) is 4.5 so I use this as 3 onthe scale. On really excellent nights I have seen down to Mag 5.5 ZLM and this gets a 5.

Seeing is slightly more subjective and before I can make a good judgement the scope has to have cooled down.

As a double star observer I use these as a useful guide. If I take for example the doble-doulbe in Lyra on an average (3)night I can split these as x96 but on a poor night it will take x133. Ona very good night I can eaily split them at x78.

Also if you look at single bright stars they will really twinkle on poor nights through the scope. But make sure it is not the hot scope causing this 1st.

Cheers

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking of seeing, the following (extracted from the latest BAA ECirc) might be of interest:

'If the sky is clear, without obvious haze, on any of the nights between December 21-24 2006, find the constellation of Orion between 8.00 pm and midnight and count how many stars you can see within the rectangle of Orion (bordered by his shoulders and feet but NOT including these four stars!). The more stars you can see, the less the light pollution.'

You can enter your findings on the BAA website or by post.

It is a little late but there is still time to take part (tonight is the last night).

To find out more, visit the Star Count web page at:

http://britastro.org/starcount

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing - if the stars are twinkling it's only worth bothering with low focal lengths for imaging. if you can't get diffraction rings but the star is a bit jumpy thats a bit better. Maybe ok for imaging up to 600mm with my small pixelled camera. If I get nice diffraction rings and a sharp little star I can collimate and go planetary imaging.

Transparency - for me I have a nice haze free sky when I can see 5 stars in the square of pegasus. Now that's moving away I will have to find another bit of sky with mag 5 stars to make a judgement on.

If the sky looks a bit orange I have serious light pollution - time for narrow band filters. Also I measure the sky glow when taking preliminary subs. I aim for the background light intensity to be less than 3000ADUs on a 16 bit image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.