lunator Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 Here a pic taken of Polaris.I don't know if it was at mag 2.1 or 2.2 at the time. CheersIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caz Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 I didn't realise Polaris was a double... :oops: Nicely split Ian... Caz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunator Posted December 16, 2006 Author Share Posted December 16, 2006 CazIt is a well kept secret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caz Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 Well it was .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geppetto Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 Neither did I caz :insects1:Nice one Ian 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunator Posted December 16, 2006 Author Share Posted December 16, 2006 Sorry Caz & PhilI meant to say it was a VERY well kept secret (until now) In your 8" scopes it will be an easy split Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CELESCOPE Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 lovely one Ian splended mate Rog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted December 16, 2006 Share Posted December 16, 2006 Every day, I learn something new 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garymcgrory Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 nice split and pic Ian, i find it's a good indication of the quality of my sky if i can clearly split Polaris with my 8 inch dobber- love the info also provided, how hard is to start observing the variable stars out there? I think this might be an area i would like to get into.CheersGary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelRat Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Good image and nice info Ian - cheers for sharing (the secret ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunator Posted January 8, 2007 Author Share Posted January 8, 2007 GaryI'm more into double Star observing & Measuring but I do some magnitude estimations which take me into variable star observing. The best place I know of is the BAA has an active variable star section and so do the AAVSOCheersian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garymcgrory Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Hi IanThanks for that info will follow up.CheersGary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZOG Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Nice image, I too didnt know that Polaris was a double until my GOTO told me It did split ok with the 130 newt though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 I didn't know til Ian told me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proflight2000 Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 I noticed that a while ago, the closer i zoomed into Polaris the more I saw a star pop out from behined it. I was using starry night mind you at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazOC Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 I didn't realise Polaris was a double... :oops: Caz :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proflight2000 Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 Ian, could I ask what paint programme you use for adding the text to your pictures? ive tried a few but that is really clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunator Posted April 10, 2007 Author Share Posted April 10, 2007 Ian, could I ask what paint programme you use for adding the text to your pictures? ive tried a few but that is really clear.I use photoshop elements 4.0. I just chose a suitable font size & type the info onto the image.Cheersian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.