Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Greetings All.


barkis

Recommended Posts

Good to have you with us Barkis. Don't know what you have read but I reckon you are better off with the Lx 90 unless you are working with a really large chip and need a very flat field. That DSI should allow you to get some great images. Works well with the Meade 3.3 focal reducer. Looking forward to reading your posts

Thanks Martin, This is the spontaneous advice I was hoping for. I bought a 6.3 reducer in anticipation, but I now realize a 3.3 F.R.

will be better.

Barkis :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Good to have you with us Barkis. Don't know what you have read but I reckon you are better off with the Lx 90 unless you are working with a really large chip and need a very flat field. That DSI should allow you to get some great images. Works well with the Meade 3.3 focal reducer. Looking forward to reading your posts

Thanks Martin, This is the spontaneous advice I was hoping for. I bought a 6.3 reducer in anticipation, but I now realize a 3.3 F.R.

will be better.

Barkis :lol:

The 6.3 will be great on things like M1 M27 M57 and the like. Best to have both :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.