Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

1st attempt at M57


Recommended Posts

Below is my first attempt at the ring nebular (un-guided), the DSO that started my foray into the dark arts of astrophotography.

I know now that there is not enough data by a long way, but there are dark flats, & flat files, only a couple of the latter!

Having read Dennis Isaacs's article 'Astro Image Data Reduction (Calibration). A Primer' www.dens-astropics.org.uk I have a much better grasp on some of the whys and wherefores :)

There are a couple of things I don't quite get at the moment, the second image is one of the un-processed files and it looks to have a lot more colour than the stacked one (first one) which I would have expected to be the other way around.

The second thing is how do I get a closer image of small DSO's, do I use a 2" Barlow or something else?

Stacked picture of Ring Nebular, taken with EOS 300D modded with Baader DSLR-AFC: Dark flats @ ISO 800 x5 30",37",59",60"& 90":

Flats @ ISO 800 x2 2" & 10": Light frames @ ISO 800 x6 47",21",17",24",23" & 51" (last 2 with UHC filter)

M57 stacked 2mb.tif

Single light frame @ ISO 800 47"

CRW_5041 2mb.tif

Thanks for looking,

Paul

I've just tried to convert the .TIF files to .jpg in Photoshop cs2 and the option doesn't come up, have I missed something again? :(:)

Paul

Edited by Paulus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here you go - converted to jpg using 'save for web'.

top image is the unstacked one. Nice try Paulus - nice colour showing up on the ring. You seem to have lost a lot of stars in stacking somehow?

post-21430-133877496273_thumb.jpg

post-21430-133877496279_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you DLP, didn't think of saving for web use! I'm not sure what happened in stacking either, was hoping someone might have a view.

Very kind of you Mike, I was pleased to see the colour but I'm not happy with much else, especially the size.

I hoped I could make it look bigger but the camera is only Meg so I suppose there are not enough pixels to get blown up detail.

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

In terms of size, M57 is really quite small. With the help of a couple of the mods here at Kelling, my first image was of M57. Under an ideal sky it came out similar to yours. That is to say - clear and neat but very, very small.

Try a crop and then an enlarge and then a gaussian blur :)

Edited by MikeWilson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.