Jupiter, 26 Aug

[brianb]

[DarkerSky]

Superb images Brian. It's interesting comparing them with Pete's image two nights previous as you both have roughly the same longitude. A few changes in the EZ are seen even over this short amount of time

[neil phillips]

Nice detail Brian

[Virgoman]

Lovely Images Brian....someday.....hopefully!!

[tooth_dr]

Yep, very nice Brian!

[beamish]

XLNT Brian, nice to see the individual captures too to compare

[TopHouse]

I'm too dumb to know what all the letters mean and what they are, but I like the top middle RRGB one, nice amount of detail. With my toucam imaging, the white middle is the part that I struggle with to get much detail so I tend to base my opinion of others images by how much I see there, for that area alone the IRGB one seems to have a little more but the RS is a tad washed out.

I'd be more than happy if I was turning out images as good as either of those two.

I can't get my head round all that new fangled RGB and LRGB imaging though.

[brianb]

I'm too dumb to know what all the letters mean and what they are, but I like the top middle RRGB one

There's a difference between being "too dumb" and not learning ...

RGB is the "usual mix". IGB is with the infrared image used instead of the red image.

xRGB is with the "x" image used for luminance.

I agree that the RRGB looks best, but (strangely) the IGB is the nearest to the natural appearance in the eyepiece!

[TopHouse]

Thanks Brian, and yes, I'd agree the IGB looks nearest to eyepiece view, to me too. I just wish this damned weather would clear up so I can get more practice in.

[AztecastroMcJ]

Great collection Brian

interesting to see IR is weakest for GRS

yet very detailed for NEB and poles

regards

James

[astroman001]

Great set of images. Well done!