Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know the current magnitude on this one? I read on the comet chasing site is should be about mag 12. Yet AN magazine has it starting September at mag 8 and climbing to mag 5.x by the end of September. Sounds well placed in the sky too. Thanks.

EDIT: Sorry, found it on MPC site. They report it as mag 15.

Edited by iamjulian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NickH imaged it last week, and reported around mag 12.3 - somewhat fainter than predicted. Though comet magnitudes are notoriously difficult to predict, this is 3 mag fainter than expected. If it stays like this it will not be as nice as predicted. In Oct the max predicted was 4.4. (according to the BAA/SPA comet site).

Here is Nick's report using the Faulkes south.

http://stargazerslounge.com/imaging-widefield-special-events-comets/111556-comet-103p-hartley-fts.html

/callump

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that in the next few weeks (during Sept) that this comet will be passing just below and to the right of Cassiopeia. Should be easy enough to find. I think Nick said in his report that it should be a naked eye comet.

I have not seen a comet with the naked eye since the AMAZING pass of Hale-Bopp. My god that was a stunning sight in the night sky. It just hung there for what seemed like months.

Edited by LukeSkywatcher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The mag is around the 12.3 to 12.7 mark (or was last week). Pete Lawrence in fact put me on to this via a FB thread, as he'd been imaging it. Maurice Gavin also reported this via cloudy nights. Pete indicated that based on the current mag, the expected mag 4 may not happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Calsky seems to tally with this

Pete's observations a few days back he visually estimated around 10.5..mine in MAxim DL came in last night around 10.8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing it now visually with the 12" Dob under good dark skies last night

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great stuff - it's fair zipping along! looks like toward the end of the month is best as it approaches Cass at around midnight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that was a productive hour spent using CalSky and TriAtlas A1 to plot its position for the next 30 days :o

Edited by iamjulian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good one

I imaged it today with Faulkes North

Images are on the EPOXI Facebook page at the mo, will clear out some space and add them here soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the comet last night around midnight. Very similar to the Andromeda Galaxy in brightness - just visible to the naked eye in a dark sky. Very easy with binoculars. To the south of Cassiopeia. Getting brighter all the time and close to Cassiopeia by the end of the month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great stuff. I am awaiting the delivery of my 15x70s (see signature) and this will be my second target (who could resist M31 being the first!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm....a Mag 10+ object with the naked eye...? You sure you were looking at this comet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same comet Nick! But yes you are right - I'd just looked at M31. Then straight to the comet afterwards with binoculars. Well spotted!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the laws of biology/physics...mag 10 naked eye = impossible

Mag 7 maybe...if you're Stephen O'Meara :-)

Impressive even wit bins...it's faint

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very similar to the Andromeda Galaxy in brightness - just visible to the naked eye in a dark sky. Very easy with binoculars. .

I find this hard to believe. Even at my suburban location, Andromeda is an easy naked-eye object, but this evening I had a look in the exact spot for Hartley with 7 x 50 bins and, as expected, couldn't see it. Unless it had a sudden short-lived outburst yesterday (which nobody else noticed).

Unfortunately, the orientation of my obsy means I can't view it with my scope at the moment.

Edited by lukebl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree, sorry but I struggled to see it easily with a 12" Dobsonian in a mag 5 location, imaging with a TMB105, it's pretty faint and small with no real tail at present, bordering between mag 10.5 to 11.5.. are you sure it was 103P?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imaged it again with Faulkes and my TMB, it's brightened visibly in the past 24-48 hours, have to doa mag estimation on my own data...Calsky saying it's mag 11, I think it's brighter

Oh...this was nice too

NASA - EPOXI Mission - In the News

Comet Cracker

Those chaps at NASA...:-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post-15266-133877480686_thumb.jpg

I made such a Horlicks with the observing that I thought I'd put things right - with thanks to lukebl and NickH. As NickH says, the good news is that comet Hartley is getting brighter. Its really faint and I am in a good observing location - and no joy with binoculars. Closest approach to Earth is 20th October 2010 at 0.12 AU, 8 days before perihelion. So things will improve. At the end of September, it will be by Cassiopeia and easier to locate. In October, it will possibly reach naked-eye visibility in Cygnus. If the image has attached properly, it shows the comet at noon today - I took the photo using Faulkes North.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeepers what's caused that gradient in the bottom right?

What filter/exposures etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - the flare at the bottom right was a bit random. I don't know what caused it - but it was in other images as well. I haven't done any real processing as the download of the large files can only be done after 24 hours. The image was RGB for 25 seconds each. The coloured image was dire, so I changed it to black and white and adjusted the exposure a bit. I've also got an i filter image to work with as well. At least I got the RA and Dec right and got my first view of the comet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.