Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Eyepieces for Celestron 102 SLT


Recommended Posts

Hi

I'm ready to look into purchasing some new EP's for my Nexstar 102.

However, I'm not sure which to go for? I have purchased a Celestron 32mm plossl which gives great widefield low power views and I'm pleased with this!!

The EP's that came with the 'scope are 25mm and 9mm (not sure if they're plossl's?) but the quality of them isn't brill.

I have a 2x barlow but again it's not brill quality and quite fuzzy when viewing through it.

My 'scope if f6.5 and just wondered what EP's would compliment my scope? Ideally I would like a new medium power and a high power for viewing planets.

Thanks

Gavin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Skys the limit on ebay do some nice EPs, but they are closed due to VAT threshold and are now on hiatus until Sept, Oct. Check the second hand forum for the one's below

I like the WO TMB planetary 12.5mm or the TMB planetary/ TS Planetary HR in various sizes. You can get them here

SPLs

Planetary

I don't think you should go lower than 4mm TMB Planetary which will give you mag of about 166x.

A SPL 12.5mm will give you 53x mag with a FOV of 2 Moon Widths about a Degree. This is my main EP for planetary in my 80mm and 6" SCT.

A 15mm TMB will give you a 44x mag and a FOV of 1.4 degrees.

These are the sort of ranges you are looking at. your 32mm will cover all your low power widefield viewing. Add a 15mm and a 4mm and you have a decent range, add a barlow later for more flexibility, not that you really need it unless you are doing a lot of Lunar IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggest that you stay with eyepieces that are about the f number of the scope, so 5-6-7mm

Really depends on the budget.

TV plossl's are £70-75 (General),

WO SWANs are £60 (FLO),

Orion ED2 are £80 (SCS Astro),

Orion Plossl's are £45-50.

What appears to be copies of Orion ED2 are £50 (Astronomica)

Neither the TV nor WO go down to 5-7mm.

Each range is within itself parfocal.

So 5mm, 12 or 15mm would seem easy,

More selections, 5mm, 8mm, 15mm,

A 5mm may not get the use as much as you would like.

Perhaps a 6mm instead of the 5mm for better usability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.