Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Does a star have to rotate?


RichieJarvis

Recommended Posts

This is gonna prove to be interesting !

Richie can you give us your thoughts on when a situation might arise?

I would have thought it is inevitable as the gas starts to collapse under gravity during the initial stages of star formation :). Hope there's a boff somewhere close who might elucidate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well - my thought is this. In an infinite universe, somewhere the gas must have coalesced from equal pressures from all directions. If so, then where does the energy come from to begin the rotation of the star?

Also - if the star stopped spinning (hypothecially) how would that effect its fusion?

Cheers,

Richie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think, In theory, you could make a non-rotating star. You'd have to have a perfectly homogenous and spherical gas cloud with no intrinsic rotation to start with; which is completely unphysical. As soon as you have any interactions with anything nearby (e.g. passing another star), you'd have a torque on the star and start it rotating.

I don't think it would affect the nuclear fusion very much; main sequence stars like the Sun spin in many 10's of days, which I suspect is practically non-rotating as far as nuclear fusion is concern. You do see some atmospheric affects in very fast rotating stars (with periods of a few hours), which you need to take into account if you want to understand the atmospheres properly.

Stars do spin down as they evolve, transferring angular momentum away through magnetic fields and stellar winds. I'm not sure they ever stop though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assumed over time it would decelerate and eventually stop ?

I can't believe I said that ! Obviously in the void of space there wouldn't be any forces acting upon the spinning star hence NO deceleration - god what a numpty !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the effect of gravity from other objects would start it spinning? The universe is expanding so it would be moving past other stuff (or other stuff past it) even if it did form perfectly symetrically (wich is unlikely). :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the only way a star could form and not rotate would be in a completely closed system then. Or one where the forces just happen to be in perfect balance. Of course, that balance would have to continue for the star not to rotate I guess.

Ok - that makes sense....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm - interesting - so would an accretion disk form around our hypothetical non-rotating star?

No, you get the disc because of angular momentum. If you had no angular momentum (no rotation), you'd have a spherical shell of accreting material. Again, you'd need perfect homogeneity in the material and the radiation pressure from the forming star...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with brantuk. from what iv learnt as a physics undergrad, regions of higher density within the dust / gas cloud start to contract due to gravity. This then attracts more gas and dust, including the other regions of higher density. These form "clumps" within the cloud which begin to swirl and spiral around due to the gravitational forces from other clumps. As the "clumps" eventually clump together the star takes shape with the accretion disk to conserve angular momentum as Teadwarf correctly stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.