justin138 Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Morning folks,Set the alarm for 4am to see the ringed planet and wasn't disappointed! Best I've ever seen it, lovely shadow of the rings on the planet and looks like a big diamond in the sky, fantastic!Using my 10" F5 Revelation with a X2 Barlow and a 12.5mm eyepiece, I only caught what I think was a fleeting glimpse of the Cassini division. Now I would have thought it would be more prominent than it was.Question is: what do I need to see the division clearly, more magnification? Filters? New scope with different F number? The seeing was a bit iffy with some boiling but there were moments of remarkable clarity.Be interested on your thoughts on this as I must confess to being a tad disappointed with no Cassini division but still well pleased with the general view of this lovely planet!CheersJustin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 No Cassini with the dob... :shock:Oh...I was hoping to see it, in fact I though you would have seen it quite easily? Silly question, but is your scope collimated perfect?Thats very disappointing else Kain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin138 Posted October 7, 2006 Author Share Posted October 7, 2006 No Cassini with the dob... :shock:Tell me about it Kain, was expecting a simply PERFECT Cassini but was no there! The shadow on the planet body was very clear so thought Cassini would be too. Ho hum!Scope was collimated about a week ago and hasn't been whacked too much since then! I think I'll re-collimate anyway and try again tomorrow. Perhaps my laser collimator needs collimating.i did wonder if I needed higher mag but with F5 dob, X2 Barlow and 12.5mm, was getting 203x which should be enough?Guess there's always tomorrow...... CheersJustin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 I'm just really suprised, I could see the devision just about with the tasco, I thought it would have have been simple with the Dob.If it's clear tonight, I will have a go and let you know how I get on.Kain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonCopestake Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 You can see the cassini division in a 4" scope or even smallerRead this article:http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php?item_id=1132Although the rings are closing up at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin138 Posted October 7, 2006 Author Share Posted October 7, 2006 You can see the cassini division in a 4" scope or even smallerRead this article:http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php?item_id=1132Although the rings are closing up at the momentExcellent article Gordon, bit heavy for this early hour though! I shall re-collimate today and try again tomorrow morning. Saturn was very bright, wonder if this might have some bearing on it or am I missing the point somewhere?I will also try the Smellyscope as well, see what happens.CheersJustin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Kain, Justin,A 10" Dob with a 12.5mm can show you the Cassini division. It must have been seeing conditions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 If I may be so bold,A 5mm Lanthanum would do the job nicely 8)Secondhand one here: http://tinyurl.com/plkyk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroman Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 I'd guess seeing conditions causing a problem. Saturn is still not very high in the sky, it could be too much atmosphere between you and the target, even if the seeing is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom.yates Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 I agree with astroman the seeing must be to blame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin138 Posted October 17, 2006 Author Share Posted October 17, 2006 Well folks, up at 5am for the Ringed One and with the 10" F5 Rev, 2X Barlow and 12.5mm eyepiece, there were discernable cloud bands and where the rings crossed the body, was so solid with a lovely shadow on the body. I'm sure I saw the Cassini Division for a split second as wellSeeing wasn't bad, the Moon washed the sky out a bit and there was a layer of haze up high. I think I need more magnification as Saturn still looked a bit too small for my liking so I think a nice 6mm is on the shopping list.Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OXO Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 Nice one Justin, ive yet to see saturn properly yet this season, you noticed cloud banding on Saturn thats not so easy well done!!!James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike bacanin Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 hello justinread the posts with interest. after the first possibilities of colimation and adequate cooldown of optics, the atmosphere,eyepiece choice and observer experience come into play. try to get a high quality eyepiece for your scope when you buy a 6mm. at f5 the eyepiece will probably play a big part in getting a good image. also the more you observe, the more you will see. i have seen cassini's in an etx 90 at about around 100x fairly easily in reasonable seeing, so i am sure your scope will do the job.sometimes even a great scope struggles to show planetary detail if seeing is poor.however last year i looked at saturn through someone's 10 inch orion reflector (think was f 5) with radian 12mm and barlow and view was awesome. i am sure your patience will be rewarded.regardsmike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin138 Posted October 18, 2006 Author Share Posted October 18, 2006 Thanks for that guys, it was hazy high up so guess this played its part (and maybe also having been out of bed for 20 mins before starting observing with bleary eyes )Was looking at getting one of these http://www.scopesnskies.com/prod/90.html people seem to say nice things about them and the wider FOV is appealing too.8 days to payday and counting............ Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonCopestake Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 For saturn you need high contrast eyepieces. The best i've used are the TV plossls, but the university orthos get a good write up as well. The wide angle eyepieces (>50 degrees) are mainly for DSO's and widefield stuff (although that doesn't stop you using them on the planets) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chubster Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 MOrning all...I too was out this morning to look at saturn and have to say I was a bit disappointed, could see her OK but she was tiny. What can I do to get "up close and personal" if anything. Was using meade 2x shorty with 12.4mm initially then went down to 10mm eyepiece supplied with scope. Still a wonderful sight but was hoping to get a little bit closer ! Thinking of doing some imaging but if that is the best I can get may have to think again Chubster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaptain Klevtsov Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 The field of view of a Toucam is about the same as if you were using a 6mm EP, or so I'm led to believe, so the image scale would be about double what you saw in the 10mm EP, then add the Barlow and you're getting there. The trade off between image scale and being able to get the thing on the chip (and keeping it there) is the issue with planet imaging. Captain Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 I had no problem seeing Cassini with the ED80 last year. But the rings have closed considerably this year, so Cassini won't be as easy to see. Throw in some naff conditions and that may explain why you couldn't see it.As already pointed out, one key to planetary observing is spending a good amount of time at the eyepiece allowing your eye to adjust.But also getting a good high power eyepiece. Orthoscopics are cheap and top notch but not particulary nice to use. Spending a lot of time at the eyepiece with one does not appeal. I ditched my orthos in favour of the Burgess/TMB Planetary Eyepiece. Sooo nice to use, excellent contrast, sharp and best of all for you, it was designed with dob users in mind. It has a 60degree FOV which is sharp edge to edge, with no lateral colour. Perfect! And it's reasonably priced too.....£69 from SCS Astro.RegardsRuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinB Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 This might sound a bit wacky but you could try stopping down your scope. F5 is tough on the optics. Great for deep sky but you don't need that sort of speed for saturn. You could try cutting out a circle of cardboard and placing it over the front of the scope and bring you down to an aperture of 6". this would bring you close upto F8. Your contrast would suffer so the bands might not be as clear, and you would loose some resolution so the encke division wont be on, but any optical collimation problems would be sorted. It would be an interesting thing to try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLO Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Interesting idea.Alternatively, make a new cap with an aperture cut so that it fits inside one quarter so avoids the secondary and spider-vanes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chubster Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 How about viewing with just the small cap off the main cover??? Or am i missing the point ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaptain Klevtsov Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Not at all Chub, that's what its there for I think. Make sure its not over the vanes though or it'll be really nasty.Captain Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chubster Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Right so be gentle with me im reallllyyy tired .......Why ?? How???..... does this make the scope slower if so why is this good ? Thought aperture was king !!!! How can reducing the aperture be a good thing .ConfusedChub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaptain Klevtsov Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 OK so the simple answer is to do with the focus of the 'scope. If you imagine the cone of light from your primary mirror coming to a sharp point, you have to put your eyepiece or camera at that position so each part of the image is a dot of very tiny size. You have to get the focus spot on because a little bit either side and you are moving along the cone of light. The disk shaped image gets bigger each side of the correct focus position as you will have seen down the eyepiece. You are looking at the cone some distance from the "point" of the cone. If you reduce the aperture the cone starts at the big end much smaller so the cone is more pointy. Moving the eyepiece or camera along the more pointy cone results in a smaller disk. It's easier to get good focus with a higher f/ ratio.Slower refers to the time taken to generate an image on a camera. Block up most of the end of the 'scope and you get less ligt so it takes longer = slower.Captain Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark RD Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 I find a simple meade 4000 15mm eye peice showed up the Cassini Division very well though my 127mm refractor, not seen saturn this side of the year though. I wouldent have thought an f5 scope would be too good on the planets.RD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.