Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Classic Refractors


Towa

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 2 weeks later...

You have a good scope there James with teh 339. I have one which I have modified with crayford focuser and its a superb planetary scope, pin sharp detail and excellent colour. I dont use the original mount either, just too wobbly I have a vixen dovetail fitted to it and I use it eiother on my Giro 2 altaz for grab and go or on my HEQ5 for more serious stuff.

They are also excellent at double stars

Philj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've now got a Lyra Optics 102mm f/11 achro and would definitely recommend it over the TAL as it has better optics and better overall build quality with beautiful fit and finish, but then it is over £100.00 more than the TAL.

http://www.lyraoptic.co.uk/Telescopes.html

John

Good to hear your thoughts on the 102mm f/11. This is the scope I didn't buy off Mr. Wu at KUOC last year. Instead I bought my 28mm UWAn. I'm still hoping to have the spare cash and opportunity to make a personal visit to Mr. Wu's telescope factory, but I've got other stuff to deal with for the time being.

To satisfy my need for a frac, I recently picked up a 90mm f/10 skywatcher, which has given me a brief, but nice, view of Jupiter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I'd like to share some pics from my vintage japanese Dan Beam 76.2 mm f/16.4 (FL=1250mm) refractor. A real planet killer from 30 or 40 years ago.
Dan Beam brtand has a "Circle K" on the focouser, so we know this is one of the models built by OKKK telescopes.

post-33902-0-72221600-1415558963_thumb.j

post-33902-0-31324600-1415558970_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original focuser has the old japanese 0.965" eyepiece diameter standard, but an adapter from a short focuser allows to use 1.25" eyepieces.  Aklthough long focus refractor do not demand outstanding eyepiece like the short focus counterparts, moder 1.25" ep mainly those with wide filed, give a new dimension to the telescope views.

post-33902-0-89606600-1415559475_thumb.j

post-33902-0-79704100-1415559481_thumb.j

Equatorial mount details

post-33902-0-93996000-1415559467_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if this is a "planet killer", nothing better than showing the kills, right?

The general arrangement I use, is the one shown below, cat inlcuded :grin: is:
Stady Pix Deluxe camera support
Canon Powershot A630 8 Mpx camera with CHDK firmware that allows to use an USB adapter (remote shutter)
the EQ mount has no motors therefore all exposure are time limited

post-33902-0-45312000-1415560890_thumb.j

These pics of the moon are all single shot

post-33902-0-39221700-1415560910_thumb.j

post-33902-0-92053700-1415561065_thumb.j

Thse images of Jupiter are 640x480 30fps videos processed with Registax

post-33902-0-61582100-1415561061_thumb.j

post-33902-0-85250800-1415561067_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mars and Saturn.
Again all images are the final output of Registax program applied to 640x480 videos (30fps).
Hope these pics give you an idea of how these vintage refractors perform.
I don't doubt that despite of their long focus, these refractors are able to give beautiful DSO pictures (using Deep Sky Stacker for example) if a motorized EQ is available for long expsures anlomng a decent DSLR. the idea would be to put one of these OTAs on a modern EQ mount and see how performs. The same thing recording HD videos on planets with a DSLR, certainly more frames and sharpness will give better pics of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn!!!

post-33902-0-58875400-1415561247.jpg

post-33902-0-84319700-1415561249_thumb.j

post-33902-0-30317400-1415561245_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moon viewa are excellent, with no visible CA of course. But using wide field eyepieces in afocal method may introduce some bluish line on the moon disc thta's not present in the visual mode. Also, the full moon disc centered on wide fild eyepieces brings the moon's disc over the border of the eyepice, thus being prone to produce some CA in this border zone. (Skywatcher wiled angle 66° eyepieces). Despite all these. I believe these are amaziong images for so simple settings.

post-33902-0-68378400-1415562061_thumb.j

post-33902-0-57513400-1415562066_thumb.j

post-33902-0-75844500-1415562070_thumb.j

post-33902-0-58769400-1415562077_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One important thing to get better contrast is telescope flocking. I've found that velvet glued over a cardboard sheet gives an excellent light absorbing surface.
Moon and planet views show better contrast!

Objective end flocking
post-33902-0-14025700-1415563017_thumb.j

Focuser end flocking

post-33902-0-38926100-1415563010_thumb.j

Focuser flocking

post-33902-0-62212800-1415563014_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hello everyone, I would like to sell my ToPic Towa 339, 1970s classic, F : 1250 / D :800   The 20 page manual Says 600x power but I found 300x was best.

I have owned it from new in 1974  44years! Have receipt.  Everything is in the Wooden Case  Think in Good condition but with some user marks. 

Some of you guys seem to know this model and I wondered if you could guide me on price?  I am in Surrey in UK

I think this model was also marketed as the Jason 324 Saturn - can anyone confirm?

Many Thanks

20180317_153148.jpg

SDC10286a.jpg

SDC10286b.jpg

SDC10286c.jpg

SDC10286d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.