Jump to content


Image output size

Recommended Posts


I have just started using my new Neximage camera with reasonable results on Jupiter considering

the low altitude it is at the moment. I have searched for data & information to help me on

my way and was greatly helped by an article by Mike Swanson on the Nexomage imager. I am however

not sure what he means when he says that he sets his output size to 320x 240 as he has

had better results than at 640 x 480 ( which I have been using ) I thought that this output

size did not affect the results or operation of the capturing but was just to give a larger

window on the laptop for focussing purposes, which it seems to do. I did have problems,

recently posted, with the Registax taking ages to optimize. This I found was somewhat

solved by using 5 FPS on capturing. On 10, 20 & 30 sec run this is fairly quick but when I

tried 90 secs - 5 FPS - 20th sec exposure, not over exposed image, it took an hour to

optimize. Is this something to do with the Output size ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.