Jump to content


first time looking through a telescope...


Recommended Posts

So... This tuesday Framtidsmuseet in Borlänge took out their telescope to the woods and I went there...

I was poorly dressed so I felt like I was freezing my toes off all the time, but I remained for an hour. The moon was about half full and they used a 8" Meade of some sort with a goto. oh right, it was a bit cloudy on and off too.

I got to see Jupiter and 4 moons - wow!

... the moon - a bit bright for my eye, but also a big wow factor ;)

... M31 - the though of it being so far away is mindboggeling, but it really didnt look much more then a smudge.

... the ring nebulosa. it was really cool, but very tiny :(

... some double stars I dont remember, a blue and a red one.

... some cluster I dont remember either. but this was probably the best of the whole evening!

There was a lot of people who wanted to peek so it took some time before they switched, but I am happy with what I got to see!

Since I am trying to decide what kind of telescope to get for myself (leaning towards a dob), I think that this evening changed my view a little bit. Mostly, what I think about is how much "bigger" do a thing like M31 or ring nebula get in a 10" or 12"? Much, not much? If its not much really, I guess 8" works well enough for me and my son. Earlier we were thinking about a 10" Skywatcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi Zork, a bigger (aperture) scope doesn't make things look bigger per se (although a longer focal length will increase the magnification of any given eyeiece). Having said that, a bigger scope will allow you to use higher magnifications (in a smaller scope the image gets darker quicker) and at any given mag the image will be brighter and therefore usually better. Also in a bigger scope the theoretical resolution will be higher (ie you can se smaller features).

I have had a10" and a 6" (newtonian) and a 3" refractor. The difference btween the 6 and the 10 is significant, especially if skies are reasonably dark. However, I wouldn't say that the dfference "blew me away" or any other such dramas becasue the views are always quite subtle eg M31 is always just a faint smudge although with practice you get to see variations within the smudge.

funnly enough, the ring was a bit of a "wow" thru the 10 as against the 6 cos you could up the mag so much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Zork, sounds like you had a great evening and saw some neat things. Visually clusters always look pretty good and doubles do as well. With nebulae and galaxies is a bit trickier as they often just appear as smudges - this doesn't really change as the aperture gets bigger other than more details start to show and the extent of the smudge may increase.;)


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Zork, I have owned 6" , 8", and 10" reflectors and finally settled on the 8" and sold the other two, for me the 8" was a good mix between what it could show you and portability, the 10" was great but it was a bit heavy to carry, so I found myself reluctant to get it out of the shed sometimes if I knew I only had a short time for observing.

The 6" was much lighter, and although it was still a great scope, didnt show as much as the 10" (obviously ! ;)) so I settled on the 8" as a good mix between capability and portability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.