more Jupiter images

[red dwalf]

here`s a few more from last night, slowly getting to grips with registax.

[red dwalf]

i did these at 10 frames a second, should i have done them at 5 as i`ve now read that if you increase the frame rate you loose detail, and as i was clear last night i hoped to do better.

[Doc]

Very nice Rob as you say practise makes perect and you are getting there.

[red dwalf]

trying Mick but it hard ,far to many buttons to click and alter in registax, say nothing of the camara settings it self, makes your head hurt !

[red dwalf]

first one came out fairly well out of a bad bunch i think

[Stardust]

I'm sitting in my obsy with much the same problems and thin cloud now. I know very little, but I think i'd turn the brightness down a touch.

off to try again

[Stardust]

make that thick cloud, giving up for a while.

[Clayton]

i did these at 10 frames a second, should i have done them at 5 as i`ve now read that if you increase the frame rate you loose detail, and as i was clear last night i hoped to do better.

As long as you have enough light (which it looks like you do) You should maintain as fast a frame rate as possible. This makes no difference to the quality or detail unless the frame rate is above the transfer rate of your computer system, in which case the frames will be compressed and cause loss of detail.

Try a number of settings to see for your self. I have never found 10 to be a problem and have never seen any degradation with 15. The advantage of the faster frame rate with Jupiter is that the planet revolves so quickly that a lot more frames can be captured in the time it takes the rotation to blur the end product, and more frames to work with is better in terms of getting a smoother more detailed result from "Regi"

What you have captured is pretty good . Keep practising, and keep focusing

[AztecastroMcJ]

nice pics

had that blue effect on mine to

think rgb align tab in registax helps to reduce blue colour

still learning registax myself

James