Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

When is a rille not a rille ?


John

Recommended Posts

Over the past hour I've been observing the moon with my 5" refractor - now that it has risen in the sky a bit it's a fantastic sight :)

Copernicus is really well placed tonight, near the terminator and filled with intriguing shadows ....

Just to the north of Copernicus, in the foothills of the Montes Carpatus, I spotted a very thin rille running across the rugged landscape of the region. Having looked it up using the Virtual Moon Atlas I find it's named Rima Gay Lussac and is around 40 km in length and 1 km wide.

References on the WWW referred to this feature as a cantina which is a crater chain rather than a rille. A number of rilles are actually chains of similar sized craters when viewed though really large scopes or from photos taken by lunar probes.

I was pretty pleased to spot this feature - It's labelled as being a challenge for a 12" aperture in the Virtual Moon Atlas so I'm chuffed to have spotted it with my 5" :)

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to question the difficulty rating given by the VMA.. the rille is fairly easy to see with my 8" SCT.

TBH, i've never seen Rima Gay Lussac referred to as a catena. Some rilles have collapse pits in them (like Rima Hyginus) and may 'appear' to be a catena, but they're actually not. Maybe this is where the confusion comes from?

In any case, i'm glad you got some nice lunar views. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to question the difficulty rating given by the VMA.. the rille is fairly easy to see with my 8" SCT.

TBH, i've never seen Rima Gay Lussac referred to as a catena. Some rilles have collapse pits in them (like Rima Hyginus) and may 'appear' to be a catena, but they're actually not. Maybe this is where the confusion comes from?

In any case, i'm glad you got some nice lunar views. :)

That's interesting Carol - I'll need to do some more reading !.

I agree that VMA's rating is pessimistic - while it was not an "easy" spot in the 5", once found, it was reasonably clear and did not come and go with seeing. With the viewing conditions for lunar features varying hugely depending on the phase I can't really see that there can be too many hard and fast rules on what you can and can't see with given apertures. With some features the "window" of lunar illumination can be very short - even an hour can make a real difference with some features.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.