Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I enjoy being outside even when itā€™s cold. Ā And of course itā€™s not the same. I also got rid of as much unnecessary tech as possible. No PC or laptop for me, although I have a smartphone and iPad. Personally I was more than happy to see the PC out of the door having worked in IT for 30 yrs šŸ˜€

  • Like 8
Posted (edited)

Not relevant if the planets, but I take a perverse joy in the fact that some photon has spent the last couple thousand/million years trucking about the universe unimpeded only to end its existence on the backside of a teuchters eyeball.

Edited by Ratlet
It is its
  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 7
Posted
4 hours ago, GasGiant said:

When Ai can do it for you from the comfort of your armchair .....Ā šŸ˜‚

Ā 

But it can't do it can it?Ā  Now if I wanted a cartoon drawing that would be different. :)Ā 

JimĀ 

  • Like 4
Posted
5 hours ago, Ratlet said:

Not relevant if the planets, but I take a perverse joy in the fact that some photon has spent the last couple thousand/million years trucking about the universe unimpeded only to end its existence on the backside of a teuchters eyeball.


Wot he saidšŸ˜Š

  • Like 2
Posted

Think the post was more to do with how far along AI image generation has come along though...

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Elp said:

Think the post was more to do with how far along AI image generation has come along though...

Ā 

360_F_551255090_XWi4F36uVD22P0uBI63ErY34bFyDPYYI.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

It's interesting how the stars appear different in each one.Ā  Like there are none on Saturn and the moon looks like it has a field stop.

Wonder how that one will cope with nebula.Ā  I tried that before on one and the results were universally awful.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, GasGiant said:

LollllzĀ šŸ˜‚

bones (3).png

bones (4).png

You could probably seed these onto Facebook or tiktok.Ā  5 million likes and it'll be posted by 30 other people claiming they took them.

Seriously though, I think it's pretty much at the point with nebula where you'd struggle to pick the AI art out of a line up on a casual look.Ā  Except the horse.

Edited by Ratlet
  • Like 2
Posted

Ai generative art really doesn'tĀ  work for me, far too cartoon like in style, colour so far oversaturated and so obviously machine created with mistakes. Ai astrophotographs are worst offenders.Ā 

JimĀ 

  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, Elp said:

Think the post was more to do with how far along AI image generation has come along though...

But that the thing, I don't think it actually has reached anything near commendable. There is something about Ai generative art that just leaves me reaching for the bucket. :(Ā It's akin to the early days of PowerPoint where people flooded presentations with stupid clip art and transitions on every page. For me it still has some way to go before it is treated as something other than a curiosity.Ā 

JimĀ 

  • Like 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Ratlet said:

You could probably seed these onto Facebook or tiktok.Ā  5 million likes and it'll be posted by 30 other people claiming they took them.

Seriously though, I think it's pretty much at the point with nebula where you'd struggle to pick the AI art out of a line up on a casual look.Ā  Except the horse.

This why I dont trust a lot of astro images. Its all edited with artistic license.

One pet peeve of mine are the colourised images of the moon. Utterly ridiculous in my opinionĀ Ā 

Posted
16 hours ago, GasGiant said:

When Ai can do it for you from the comfort of your armchair .....Ā šŸ˜‚

Ā 

Ā 

Bones (1).png

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Ahh yess the oblonged eggturn( if you look closely it is not a geoid but and egg)

Posted

We now live in a world where so much of it is fake.

I prefer the real thing. A good old fashioned sensualist. You can spent hours watching Jupiter's surface and its moons rotate, or studying the changing light on lunar craters, or looking at stars whose light can take from tens to millions of years to reach you.

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)

They look fake to us because weā€™ve done some astronomy. To a beginner, or someone that hasnā€™t done astronomy, they could seem real. Some of my friends, who havenā€™t done astronomy, think that sticking a camera (and these days a camera is a smartphone) up to an eyepiece is all you need to do to get ā€œthose space picturesā€.

And is the question aimed at visual astronomy, astrophotography, or both? They are two very different things.Ā 

Visual - is this even remotely close to, for example, the experience of seeing the veil for the first time in a Bortle 1-2 site with my daughter. A site along the Mediterranean coast, in pitch black, using a small reflector with the smell of the sea, wild thyme and the sound of waves lapping against the rocks? No and I doubt it ever will be.Ā 

Astrophotography - I donā€™t do ā€œproperā€ astrophotography. But with a smart telescope you are close to imaging without ā€œgoing out in the coldā€. You can, I believe, do this via a remote observatory (something that I have zero interest in). I was intrigued when my daughter drew some sketches of the planets - inc Jupiter, Saturn & Mars. They were all in an ā€œupside downā€ Dob view. Even Mars had its North Polar Hood at the bottom/south. Now, over the yrs, from an early age, from way before we got a telescope, Alice has seen an order of magnitude more pictures of the planets which are all ā€œthe other way upā€. So why did she draw them all in the way sheā€™d seen them at the eyepiece? I suspect itā€™s because the experience had a far greater impact. When I asked her why she replied with:- ā€œbecause they are realā€, implying that the images sheā€™d seen were somehow fake. Hellā€¦ I can well remember my first view of Saturn through a telescope when I was about 15. And trust me, thatā€™s a long, long time ago! I certainly canā€™t remember my first picture of Saturn and I doubt ā€œAIā€ would have made any difference. Now, if I, or my daughter, had been into astrophotography I bet that our own images would have far more impact, pleasure and value than anyone elseā€™s, or something generated by ā€œAIā€. Doesnā€™t matter how real or fake they are. Is any photography actually real?Ā 

Edited by PeterStudz
  • Like 3
Posted
46 minutes ago, GasGiant said:

One pet peeve of mine are the colourised images of the moon. Utterly ridiculous in my opinionĀ Ā 

Do you mean mineral moon images? I quite like them. I can see subtle colours on the moon and Iā€™m not a fan of those who ā€œgreyscaleā€ their lunar images. Thatā€™s just as fake. I also find that generally kids, with their younger eyes, are better at seeing subtle colours than most adults. Thereā€™s a topic on seeing lunar colour hereā€¦

Ā 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.