Jump to content

M27 in a Sea of Stars


PeterC65

Recommended Posts

It rained most of yesterday but the Met Office Cloud Cover Map assured me that it would be clear after dark, so I setup the 72mm refractor alongside the 55mm Pentax lens. This was the second outing for the Pentax 55mm and this time I’d fitted it with a UV/IR cut filter and a dew strap, and set the aperture to F5.6 at the suggestion of @Elp. It worked much better this time and I was rewarded with some amazing widefield views.

I tried using the new SynScan Pro auto align feature again, this time with 4 alignment points, but the mount decided it needed an alignment point behind the house so I aborted and tried a 3 point alignment again. Like last time, the mounts initial position was bottom left of a rectangle and the furthest slew was through 60° azimuth and 30° altitude to the top right. After that the alignment was not great so I did a manual 3 star alignment which was better. Still, this is where plate solving comes to the rescue.

All of this alignment faff meant that much of the Milky Way had disappeared behind the hill, but I could still see M11 and the Pentax 55mm showed it within the context of the Milky Way.

image.thumb.png.73ca195f157e4a716dce27f1da867169.png

M11

Next up were two clusters, NGC6633 and IC4756. NGC6633 was too big for the refractor but I could see both together with the Pentax. Since the Pentax seemed to be working well I tried for a couple of dark nebulae, B142 & B143. B143 filled the field of view of the refractor with an obvious C of darkness, but with the Pentax I could see both it and its companion, and the star cloud that contains them both.

image.thumb.png.428aa0a17446f9b2bc7bf0371b25992b.png

B142 & B143

The previous EAA session had been great for observing emission nebulae with the L-eNhance filter, and this time I’d swapped the x0.6 reducer for the x1.0 field flattener which gives much more pleasing (round) stars. So I slewed to NGC6823 and sure enough there it was.

image.thumb.png.6547f9c5effea1f3b0e0b01db82f2243.png

NGC6823

But what blew me away was the view through the Pentax 55mm as I could see M27 to the side. I slewed to it next and there it was, centred in the field of view surrounded by a sea of stars from the Milky Way.

image.thumb.png.4b53b91a0a033278b0d9ff83b9e8b6c1.png

M27

This got me wondering just what else the Pentax might be able to pick up so I slewed to Sadr. I could see the star within the arm of the Milky Way, surrounded by emission nebulosity. Right at the bottom centre of the field of view was the Crescent Nebula, NGC6888, which I’d had centred in the refractor just before, and a third of the way up just left of centre was the Cooling Tower Cluster, M29. So many objects seen together (highlighted when I did a plate solve and annotation).

image.thumb.png.1a2da399e747017e70f31a7c052f13c8.png

SAO049528 Sadr

Now I was on a mission. Could I observe the whole of the Veil Nebula? Yes I could, and again, great to see it in some context.

image.thumb.png.783ce3fd9670ccb25324f59efcedaff9.png

NGC6960 & NGC6974 & NGC6992

I also tried widefield views of M31 and M33 which weren’t so impressive, and finally settled on the Heart and Soul Nebulae, IC1805 and IC1848, together with the Double Cluster, NGC884 and NGC869.

image.thumb.png.e421a96ee7bab738997c9d42f5e515b4.png

IC1805 & IC1848 & NGC869 & NGC884

The session wasn’t entirely dominated by the Pentax widefield though. It was interesting to compare the view through the refractor and to match the detail shown by that with the widefield context shown by the Pentax, and I managed to observe Stephan’s Quintet, NGC7317/18/19/20, for the first time. Surprising what I could see of it with the small refractor. It will be much better with the Explorer 200 I expect.

image.thumb.png.32d3a75981a31605cd62ef0118f21feb.png

NGC7317 & NGC7318 & NGC7319 & NGC7320

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A man after my own heart. I liken myself to a child in a sweet shop :)  I wan't a bit of everything!

I particularly like the Stephan's Quintet, something my own efforts with have been dissapointing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still need to try the Newtonian's after fitting them with fans over the Summer to help keep the dew at bay, and I'm picking up an electronic focuser at IAS on Saturday which will hopefully improve the focus when I use filters and will let me make more use of the IR pass filter which is very obviously not parfocal with the rest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one of the reasons I prefer short FL, you can take in more of the sky, have a better sense of scale and your place in relation. When I attempted Rho Ophiuchi it was stark to see just how large the region of sky was, it felt like an eighth of the sky when seeing it in person (more so the main stars bordering Antares).

Edited by Elp
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.