Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Ts optics max field coma corrector


Recommended Posts

I used it for a while and have 2 major gripes with the design (mine was TS branded).

First is that it has issues with internal reflections if a bright star is within a few degrees just outside the field of view. See below for examples (the coma cluster one was particularly difficult to remove, almost ruined the shot):

NGC4236-5h34m-rainbow1.thumb.jpg.8e5bb7aa3227354298f053c5c28200da.jpg

reflections.PNG.217e047205141f1a2c835bd9f0e75194.PNG

comacluster-reflection.thumb.jpg.f6efaac40e51ffd0c2462cae440a3d49.jpg

There was another case where i was shooting a comet but cant find the data now. It was garbage so might have deleted it but it had a reflection across the center of the image from Pollux a couple of degrees outside the FOV.

The second is that it doesn't do a very good job as a coma corrector. Never saw good sharpness across the frame no matter how much backfocus searching i tried. In order to get decent stars across the entire frame i had to focus using a star in the outer third of the field of view. That is obviously a compromise as it means the center stars are not at their best focus. To be fair it wasn't awful, but still there are better options at similar prices (such as the 1.0x GPU) so lets say i do not recommend this one.

I upgraded to a TeleVue Paracorr and yes i know its literally twice the price so not a fair comparison but my star sizes measured in arc seconds improved by 20-30% compared to the Maxfield. On axis performance improved even more, but since i still need to focus with a non-center star the center sharpness has limited benefits.

 

***Forgot to mention that my scope is an f/4.4 one, i have seen mentions online that the corrector does a much better job for f/5 primary mirrors. Apparently something to do with spherical aberrations being introduced with faster mirrors.

Edited by ONIKKINEN
forgot scope
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ONIKKINEN said:

I used it for a while and have 2 major gripes with the design (mine was TS branded).

First is that it has issues with internal reflections if a bright star is within a few degrees just outside the field of view. See below for examples (the coma cluster one was particularly difficult to remove, almost ruined the shot):

NGC4236-5h34m-rainbow1.thumb.jpg.8e5bb7aa3227354298f053c5c28200da.jpg

reflections.PNG.217e047205141f1a2c835bd9f0e75194.PNG

comacluster-reflection.thumb.jpg.f6efaac40e51ffd0c2462cae440a3d49.jpg

There was another case where i was shooting a comet but cant find the data now. It was garbage so might have deleted it but it had a reflection across the center of the image from Pollux a couple of degrees outside the FOV.

The second is that it doesn't do a very good job as a coma corrector. Never saw good sharpness across the frame no matter how much backfocus searching i tried. In order to get decent stars across the entire frame i had to focus using a star in the outer third of the field of view. That is obviously a compromise as it means the center stars are not at their best focus. To be fair it wasn't awful, but still there are better options at similar prices (such as the 1.0x GPU) so lets say i do not recommend this one.

I upgraded to a TeleVue Paracorr and yes i know its literally twice the price so not a fair comparison but my star sizes measured in arc seconds improved by 20-30% compared to the Maxfield. On axis performance improved even more, but since i still need to focus with a non-center star the center sharpness has limited benefits.

 

***Forgot to mention that my scope is an f/4.4 one, i have seen mentions online that the corrector does a much better job for f/5 primary mirrors. Apparently something to do with spherical aberrations being introduced with faster mirrors.

Thanks for that , intresting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been using the ts maxfied for a few years now and ive found no problems at all. No reflections and stars correct across the entire fov.

Ive recommended this cc on numerous occasions escpecially when i see people mention problems with the Baader spacing and tilt.

I use 56mm spacing with an Asi533 on a 130pds

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.