Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The rays of Tycho run straight and true...

image.png.612afb57e9a6ac12fc72315dd7690996.png

But the rays of Copernicus and Kepler are wavy:

image.png.bbff2be8e5a384bc99e3c9de5cd5c67f.png

I don't understand the difference. Does anyone know the reason why? 

Edited by Ags
Posted

Surface material? Maria areas are topped with lava which is denser than the upland areas so it comes out slower and more chunky.

Posted (edited)

Higher speed impact, ejecta launched further from the surface and took longer to fall back so lunar rotation plus other gravitational effects caused a more untidy final surface distribution of ejecta ? Further smearing / distortion caused by tectonic activity triggered by the impact ? Just guessing here !

 

Edited by John
Posted

I think that the Copernicus impact led to many more secondary impacts which produced rays that overlapped the primary rays, causing them to appear sinuous. Maybe the Tycho impact either produced less secondary impactors or the secondary rays were less visible or didn’t  interfere with the primary rays as much.

All down to differences in the Highland/Mare geology perhaps? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.