Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

TOA 130 vs C11Edge


Rodd

Recommended Posts

I am pretty much resolved to the decision that the TOA 130 is the better choice for me--mostly becuase of my sky.  On the rare occasions the seeing is very good, the C11 can pull out extraordinary details--but so can the refractor....maybe not quite as much.  But it does it 65% of the time instead of 10% of the time.  Here is a good example of the difference.  Both images were taken with the ASI 1600 and are bin2.  The TOA has a resolution of 1.12" and the C11 has a resolution of .8".  There is much to say about the differences of the systems, in all respects.  But the images tell a better tale.  To my eyes, the realized resolution is very close, but I like the color better in the TOA, and or colurse the FOV.  The question is, with a full frame sensor on the c11, and a similar FOV, would they be identical.  if soi, then it really is jhust down to the percent of the time the data is not ruined by seeing/guiding/wind, etc.

TOA 130-25 hours

 

b2.thumb.jpg.46dbd26145f2d1fa55f21be392a3d51b.jpg

C11-32 hours

c3.thumb.jpg.67644405de39e9f2ce96ef94821e5f75.jpg

 

Edited by Rodd
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.