Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

A slice of Auriga - 6 pane mosaic


geeklee

Recommended Posts

I think most people have imaged small or large sections of this area of sky - including myself.  I wanted to create a slightly larger FOV using the Samyang 135 lens - this needed six panes with the small sensor of the ASI533MM - just about fitting what I wanted.  The Samyang was stopped down to a pedestrian ~F2.6 for ~20 hours of Ha and 10 hours of OIII.  Astronomik MaxFR 6nm Ha and OIII filters were used.

image.png.def7433af43b6421a6448d390021df54.png

It's fantastic to see so much of this area together to appreciate the scale of some objects and also their proximity to each other.  The huge Spaghetti nebula (Sh2240) looming in the lower left and the scale of the vast Ha near the Flaming Star and tadpoles.  Then those very faint Ha objects that have through well here.

It feels like (much) longer, but I've been shooting this for just a couple of months.  I wanted to draw a line under this data set - perhaps returning later in the year for more OIII and perhaps SII (and Ha! ).  I left plenty of subs on the cutting room floor but also had to let through some I'd have preferred not too.  There is fairly even coverage across each pane in Ha and OIII though - with Ha typically taking a 2:1 ratio.  

The version here is 33% of the original which gave me more room to bring out the fainter objects while - hopefully - retaining some good detail.  Do click through to open in a new tab.

Captured with the ASIAIR Pro, pre-processed in APP and processed in PixInsight.

Thanks for looking.

FullSize-Proc1-33Pct.thumb.jpg.b670ed1d282ad6b73b4e7ce4f70f038f.jpg

Here's a smaller, annotated version.

FullSize-Proc1-Small_Annotated.thumb.jpg.3658bcd3d5bf7142f0ea41bb4880f63f.jpg

Edited by geeklee
Added filters used.
  • Like 39
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is spectacular, great work :)

I tried shooting the spaghetti nebula with a OSC camera (from bortle 8 )and gave up after collecting 5 hours of data due to having very little signal to play with (and clear nights being at a premium). This image highlights the power of mono!!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @Stuf1978 @teoria_del_big_bang @Mr Spock @MalcolmM @gorann

14 hours ago, Stuf1978 said:

This image highlights the power of mono!!

Definitely, mono makes a difference.  Another thing in play here for Sh2-240 is star separation and resampling/binning.  Personally, I couldn't present this image at 100% as it wouldn't have shown the same depth and still look as clean as I would like. There is plenty of OIII in Sh2-240 and I'm not showing this clearly due to a decision in processing and also because I hardly had any integration time!

Here's a snippet of the Ha stack from Pane 5 that contained Sh2-240 (that's about all it contained!).  This is 3.7 hours.

image.png.4c5565fa75c17d12f995d84dd7e49503.png

Here's the right hand image above with a  gentle stretch.  If you open that in a new tab for full resolution you'll see it's struggling a little.  You can get a little Sh2-240 data easily but pulling that out in a way that doesn't look forced is difficult in my eyes.

I also find careless noise reduction can ruin the subtleness of the structure in Sh2-240.  It's hard to describe the effect I mean. 🙂

image.thumb.jpeg.0b00d933666de4f5f00b9a713718a0d8.jpeg

Here's a collaboration I did with @Adreneline where we spent 24 hours on Ha and 11 hours on OIII just on Sh2-240.

 

Edited by geeklee
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gorann said:

and what a great idea to capture all these goodies together!

Thanks again Göran.  Necessity of the small 533 sensor forced the larger number of panes in the planned mosaic.  As soon as you get to this FOV you start to see what a few panes below and left would do - then you could be in real trouble 🤣

3 hours ago, gorann said:

I assume you have a quite dark sky.

Sadly not.  Bortle 5-6 depending on direction with some localised light pollution (street lights etc) mixed in.

Edited by geeklee
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/01/2023 at 08:24, geeklee said:

  You can get a little Sh2-240 data easily but pulling that out in a way that doesn't look forced is difficult in my eyes.

That is exactly what I found, I had the basic structure at 5 hours with OSC but I had to really push the data and it looked awful. I reckon I'd need to gather 20 plus hours of OSC data from my location to get a presentable image which I just wasn't prepared to do. Tough target for sure :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/01/2023 at 14:55, geeklee said:

this needed six panes with the small sensor of the ASI533MM -

Awesome.  Why use a "small sensor"?  Is it the only camera you have?  If that is the case, understandable.  But can you imagine this 6-pane mosaic with a larger sensor--or fewer panes for the same area.  Mosaics seem great, but I have trouble getting enough clear sky time for one panel.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.