fwm891 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 A reprocess of LDN1235 (the Shark). Circa 45 subs ranging between 300s and 600s processed in PI to linear phase then BlurETraction applied followed by StarEXtraction. Star layer and shark layers then processed separately and recombined with pixelmath. I hope you don't mind the reprocessing...? 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saac Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 No, keep them coming because it is good to see what different processing achieves especially with the newer software tools. These are amazing imho. Jim 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carastro Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Looks really good Francis. I don’t mind reprocessing but it would be good to see the comparison to previous version and tell us what you have done differently. Carole 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fwm891 Posted January 12 Author Share Posted January 12 4 hours ago, carastro said: Looks really good Francis. I don’t mind reprocessing but it would be good to see the comparison to previous version and tell us what you have done differently. Carole This was the original processing Carole 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil27 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 10 hours ago, fwm891 said: A reprocess of LDN1235 (the Shark). Circa 45 subs ranging between 300s and 600s processed in PI to linear phase then BlurETraction applied followed by StarEXtraction. Star layer and shark layers then processed separately and recombined with pixelmath. I hope you don't mind the reprocessing...? Looks great Francis and it makes the nebula really ‘pop’ out from the previous version, where I think it got lost in the sea of stars. PS - time to change you signature 😉 I spy my camera! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carastro Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 hours ago, fwm891 said: This was the original processing Carole Wow, quite a difference. But original was good too. Carole 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teoria_del_big_bang Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Fantastic image and what a difference 🙂 Steve 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 That's a mind-blowing improvement to the structures in the dust (which are, in your new version the best I've ever seen.) I think my StarX reprocess is going to need a starX + BlurX re-re-process now! Olly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorann Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Yes, a great improvement Francis! One comment: in the new version bright stars and the blue (and some yellow) areas around them have been blown out. There is more details in these areas in the first version. When that happens to me I try to select the best of each version. If you have PS, you can put the old version as an invisible layer on top of the new one and blend in some of the old with the brush tool where the old version is less blown out. Maybe as a luminosity layer (experiment with blend mode). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.1d41b37621d46a71c73b86e0bb7ea8f0.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now