Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Do visual only members need a magazine?


NGC 1502

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Moon-Monkey said:

Hey Buddy having appeared on the podcast quite regularly with my observing reports and questions I can honesty say that’s my goto resource for info and a great Chat Chris and Shane not only are very knowledgeable but also great friends too 

Phill From the Uk 🇬🇧 😉

Aaaah, so you’re “Phil from the UK”! They are very complimentary about your reports - I think they have said you should have your own podcast! 🙂

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RobertI said:

Aaaah, so you’re “Phil from the UK”! They are very complimentary about your reports - I think they have said you should have your own podcast! 🙂

Lol yes i am actually working on an observing podcast now that sadly Dons podcast has ended really miss Don both as a friend and podcaster 😞 but it has given me the bump to make it happen do not expect a podcast like Chris and Shane’s podcast though I will refer people to episodes of theirs for specifics I think they are great people and great friends 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I used to really look forward to Sky & Telescope and bought it religiously until the destructive take over a number of years ago. I didn't usually buy it for the astro charts etc, but for the enthusiasm displayed by our American cousins that I find sadly lacking from any British astro mag. Back in the day the equipment reviews were truly outstanding and informative. Today most reviews in mag's aren't worth the paper they are written on. Everything is so watered down and often written with an undertone of inexperience that they are effectively valueless. Then there are the silly price hikes, and paying more for less really gets under my skin, so I nolonger buy a monthly magazine and haven't done so for around ten years. Better to buy a set of 1950's to 1990's S&T's and look back at a time when amateure astronomy was truly great and observers knew their instruments and the night sky. 

 

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mikeDnight said:

Better to buy a set of 1950's to 1990's S&T's and look back at a time when amateure astronomy was truly great and observers knew their instruments and the night sky. 

And don't forget the Celestron "dolly-birds"! 🤣

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikeDnight said:

I used to really look forward to Sky & Telescope and bought it religiously until the destructive take over a number of years ago. I didn't usually buy it for the astro charts etc, but for the enthusiasm displayed by our American cousins that I find sadly lacking from any British astro mag. Back in the day the equipment reviews were truly outstanding and informative. Today most reviews in mag's aren't worth the paper they are written on. Everything is so watered down and often written with an undertone of inexperience that they are effectively valueless. Then there are the silly price hikes, and paying more for less really gets under my skin, so I nolonger buy a monthly magazine and haven't done so for around ten years. Better to buy a set of 1950's to 1990's S&T's and look back at a time when amateure astronomy was truly great and observers knew their instruments and the night sky. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.