Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Opticron Oregon Observation 70mm


Recommended Posts

My Opticron T WP 10x50s see a lot of use and are a joy under dark skies, however for those brief clear spells on work nights, I feel more aperture is required under my light polluted home skies.

I've decided once the Christmas spend frenzy is out the way, to pick up 11x70 or 15x70 binoculars. Intended use is very short hand held periods or on a monopod. If there's time to set up a tripod, I may as well get the scope out...

Opticron Oregon Observation 70mm are a nice price at £99 and I've read one good review. However the last time I used a binocular this size was fifteen years ago on range duty accompanied by a radio and unloaded rifle for appearances. 🙄

Therfore I really have no clue whether to plump for the 11x or 15x. According to the specs, weight is about the same and fov too. Instinct tells me to go for more magnification. Are my instincts correct?! Thanks in advance.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a regular binocular user but I found a pair of older, Japanese 11x70's by Opticron (the Oregon LER I think the model is) pre-owned and find that I can hand hold them reasonably comfortably, which is a big plus for me. I think the current Oregon binoculars are different though - the LERs are out of production now.

11x70s.JPG.8a703f65aa078924def92b4dd190af93.JPG

Edited by John
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the 15x70 Oregon’s and I love using them. To be honest I found them too heavy for hand held observing. I use them on a little lightweight tripod and it’s great. It’s still a lot less work than setting up one of my scopes 

70D507EC-A3B1-472F-B664-776F96A2EBCE.thumb.jpeg.6a8445a56c03362c3c9913c83adba181.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bosun21 said:

I have the 15x70 Oregon’s and I love using them. To be honest I found them too heavy for hand held observing. I use them on a little lightweight tripod and it’s great. It’s still a lot less work than setting up on70D507EC-A3B1-472F-B664-776F96A2EBCE.thumb.jpeg.6a8445a56c03362c3c9913c83adba181.jpege of my scopes 

Thanks. I have a very sturdy Manfrotto monopod so they should work OK on that?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a  nice pair of Opticron Oregon 15 x 70. I find a bit much hand held. Doable for a short period.

I didn’t go for the 11 x 70s as I thought the 6.4 mm exit pupil a bit large for my ageing eyes. More so if used under light pollution  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JeremyS said:

I have a  nice pair of Opticron Oregon 15 x 70. I find a bit much hand held. Doable for a short period.

I didn’t go for the 11 x 70s as I thought the 6.4 mm exit pupil a bit large for my ageing eyes. More so if used under light pollution  

Brilliant Jeremy just what I needed to know. Thanks. 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, John said:

Excellent and detailed review of what I think is the current Opticron Oregon 15x70's here:

http://alpha-lyrae.co.uk/2015/07/04/opticron-oregon-15x70-binoculars-review/

Are these basically the same as the Celestron Astromaster 15x70's ?

 

Thanks John. I will find out soon enough. Last night I suffered from a bout of itchy trigger finger! 🙄😁

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, John said:

Are these basically the same as the Celestron Astromaster 15x70's ?

I've had them both and although the specs and build are very similar, in my samples at least, the Skymasters were the better binocular. I think it's all down to QC with these budget models, I've read some very promising reviews on both models but the Oregon 15x70 I had seemed to have a very narrow Fov and they were slightly out of collimation, they got returned. The Skymasters were better but for me the x15 was too much for handheld and on a monopod and tripod I found them uncomfortable to use. If I were to go for big binos I'd have to get a dedicated mount for them such as the Orion parallelogram type.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go for the 15x -- 10x (or 11x) really needs very dark skies and exit pupils that can cope with the 6.2 mm exit pupil (6.2 because the binocular is internally stopped to an effective aperture of 62mm). If you want "proper" 70mm aperture, something like the Helios Stellar II is pretty good (and the seem to have fixed the slack focus that was a "feature" of the original ones).

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/11/2021 at 16:04, BinocularSky said:

I'd go for the 15x -- 10x (or 11x) really needs very dark skies and exit pupils that can cope with the 6.2 mm exit pupil (6.2 because the binocular is internally stopped to an effective aperture of 62mm). If you want "proper" 70mm aperture, something like the Helios Stellar II is pretty good (and the seem to have fixed the slack focus that was a "feature" of the original ones).

What would you recommend as a decent astronomical binocular in the size range of 20x80? Up to about £400. Thanks Steve 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stormbringer said:

Why the large difference in price when they are the same size and magnification from the same manufacturer?🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The diferance in price reflects the quality of the binoculars better glass ,better lighter body,more light transmitted by the coatings etc

I would have also included the Helios Apollo 22x85's wich are inbetween the other 2 and were selling around the £420 mark but FLO dont list them anymore 

I have a pair of these and they are quite impressive pair of bins

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Stormbringer said:

The diferance in price reflects the quality of the binoculars better glass ,better lighter body,more light transmitted by the coatings etc

I would have also included the Helios Apollo 22x85's wich are inbetween the other 2 and were selling around the £420 mark but FLO dont list them anymore 

I have a pair of these and they are quite impressive pair of bins

 

Thanks for your recommendations and I now have food for thought. I may just go over budget and get the lightquests. It’s a one off purchase that will last 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, late to return to the party.

On 30/11/2021 at 21:45, bosun21 said:

What would you recommend as a decent astronomical binocular in the size range of 20x80? Up to about £400. Thanks Steve

The LQs that @Stormbringer recommended are a fine  instrument. If it helps to make a decision, my review of it is at https://binocularsky.com/binoc_reviews.php

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/12/2021 at 19:55, Stormbringer said:

The diferance in price reflects the quality of the binoculars better glass ,better lighter body,more light transmitted by the coatings etc

I would have also included the Helios Apollo 22x85's wich are inbetween the other 2 and were selling around the £420 mark but FLO dont list them anymore 

I have a pair of these and they are quite impressive pair of bins

 

Are both the 16x and the 20x models of the Lightquest equally good and not one overshadowed by the other? Thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Stormbringer said:

Sorry i dont know but you can read Steve Tonkins review liinked above

Yeah I just saw that after I posted. Reading Steve’s reviews it seems like the lightquest range as a whole is good 👍 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.