Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

IC 166: a billion year old open cluster


Martin Meredith

Recommended Posts

IC 166 is a relatively faint open cluster set amongst a rich star field in Cassiopeia, a couple of degrees almost due south of Segin. At times the dense foreground can make such clusters hard to spot, but on this occasion the profusion of fainter stars makes the cluster stand out even in mono. But what makes this cluster interesting for me is the uniform reddening of its members in contrast to the range of stellar colours on offer in the foreground. This is reminiscent of the best of the Berkeley clusters which often have a similar configuration -- lots of faint red stars tightly clustered, giving it a kind of 'gritty' texture. With a diameter of just over 7 arcmin it fits nicely in a small FOV.

IC 166 is about 1 billion years old (give or take 200 million years) and while this makes it quite a lot older than most, it is classified as an 'intermediate' age cluster. Due to disruption to members as the cluster orbits the galaxy, not many clusters reach the grand old age of a billion. However,  IC 166 sits beyond the Perseus arm of the galaxy at a distance of 4.3 kpc from us, or 12.7 kpc from the centre of the galaxy, and it is hypothesised that disruptive effects are lower in the outer disc so chances of survival are higher. The dense 'nearby' star field set against the more distant cluster I think adds some depth to the shot.

Ref [1] gives some optically-derived information while [2] contains a spectrographic study, complete with the slightly deflating conclusion that IC 166 is an unremarkable cluster. For me it was probably the highlight of the night...

 

1142286399_IC16624Oct21_10_39_35.png.d75c0667fff8dd5dc95e1476139e66b6.png

This is a live LRGB combination with manipulations in LAB colour space. The camera is not mentioned on the image -- it was my usual Lodestar X2 mono.

cheers

Martin

 

[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0703075.pdf

[2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.09575.pdf

Edited by Martin Meredith
typo
  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Martin,

Always enjoy your colour views of clusters. Surprised me just how many yellow (orange) stars there are in this one - function of the clusters age?  I shall note this gem for a visual look at the "diamonds sparkling away against the black background" with the 15 (wish I still had the 20!).

Below is the Aladin/SDSS9 view.

image.png.0abff3c1897f2deda59266b241e40812.png

Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mike

I think it is more a function of distance (reddening with all the intermediate dust).

As a bit of fun I turned saturation up to try to match the SDSS view. Its always interesting to match the star colours to an external reference (though I do find the SDSS a bit over-the-top).

462228474_IC16624Oct21_18_56_26.png.4665be1b557c7fef4262c0702d972e25.png

Martin

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the blue stars have died long ago, leading to a redder than expected overall colour.

If a star is massive enough to shine blue or white it has a short lifespan, blowing up early and leaving the smaller stars behind. Open clusters tend to have very similar stars in them because they are all born from the same molecular clouds and in this case it just so happens that a lot of them have reached their red giant phases now, leading to the red colour.

Looks like there are blue stars too, but they are overpowered by the red giants.

Edited by ONIKKINEN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.