Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

An evening with Jupiter, Ganymede and friends….


Stu

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Stu said:

I have an 8” Skywatcher pillar which I can make work for the moment, but hopefully Rowan will produce something matching in the not too distant future.

Also thinking a pillar is required as well.
I might find out how much the ADM option is, however I'd like it to be similar to the Vixen/Baader half-pillar with the side cut out..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Deadlake said:

Vixen/Baader half-pillar with the side cut out..

That’s a good point actually, I tend to remove my AZ100 when setting up/breaking down so this needs to be quick and easy, whether by a cut out pillar or other means. The skywatcher AZGTi pillar for example works well without need for a cutout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stu said:

That’s a good point actually, I tend to remove my AZ100 when setting up/breaking down so this needs to be quick and easy, whether by a cut out pillar or other means. The skywatcher AZGTi pillar for example works well without need for a cutout.

I think the Baader might be the best option as it has the cut out and the ADM does not.
I'd like to be able to swap out mounts, say put a ScopeTech Zero in place. 
Maybe Derek has an offering???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Alan White said:

 

Stu, I cut a 60mm hole in the side of my 7.5" SW Extension Tube, gives access  to the screw,
M10 in my case, I can remove the mount away from all the rest.

IMG_2936.thumb.JPG.eff15eb7b7be4fce718440fac861ec41.JPG


 

Two questions Alan….

How did you cut the hole?

60mm? Do you have little T-Rex hands? 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deadlake said:

I think the Baader might be the best option as it has the cut out and the ADM does not.
I'd like to be able to swap out mounts, say put a ScopeTech Zero in place. 
Maybe Derek has an offering???

Rowan will look into a pier when they have time. I use a Gitzo tripod with the Scopetech zero so that’s not an issue, easy separation of the mount for carrying is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Deadlake said:

Maybe I need a carbon tripod 😀

They are a great match for the Scopetech I reckon. I have my Gitzo setup permanently either with the Scopetech or Giro-WR and it’s ideal as a lightweight option for quick sessions. I used it last summer to carry up onto the local Heath to observe Comet C/2020 F3 NEOWISE with my Genesis, and it’s also great for grab and go solar with the Tak.

566FE4C4-0E06-4636-884B-3F38869123EE.jpeg

76B1F728-F2DD-4478-90E8-B62BC7495C4C.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Deadlake said:

Baader BBHS T2 prism vs diagonal. 

Yep. I’ve got the previous Zeiss T2 prism, without BBHS coatings I assume. Given that prisms have total internal reflection I’m not sure what different the coatings make. What are the spec differences I wonder? Not that I intend to upgrade, mine seems to work fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, F15Rules said:

Great report Stu, thanks for sharing👍.

That TOE sounds great, and I know the HR 3.4 is, having owned one..will definitely aim to get another one at some point.

Dave

Thanks Dave 👍

I’m half tempted to get another for binoviewing, but suspect I would be better off with something like a 7 or 9mm Delite and GPC/barlow them to higher powers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Stu said:

Thanks Dave 👍

I’m half tempted to get another for binoviewing, but suspect I would be better off with something like a 7 or 9mm Delite and GPC/barlow them to higher powers.

Denis in Croatia made some BV's that did not require the use of a GPC, BillP did a review of them. A bit more flexibility with which EP's you could use.
I've just got a GPC 2.6 turn up, tempted to get some 10 mm UFF's for them, as low as I can go I suspect on a random good nights seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Stu said:

Thanks Dave 👍

I’m half tempted to get another for binoviewing, but suspect I would be better off with something like a 7 or 9mm Delite and GPC/barlow them to higher powers.

I get that Stu..I have a nice Carton Japan 7-21mm zoom which I regularly use with the Baader Hyperion zoom Barlow at 2.25x.screwed in.

In my FS128 that combination gives me 334x down to 111x at the turn of the zoom barrel - a really nice and versatile range of powers, depending on sky conditions👍.

Dave

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Deadlake said:

Denis in Croatia made some BV's that did not require the use of a GPC, BillP did a review of them. A bit more flexibility with which EP's you could use.
I've just got a GPC 2.6 turn up, tempted to get some 10 mm UFF's for them, as low as I can go I suspect on a random good nights seeing.

I know. Not bothered about low power, I prefer single widefield eyepieces for that, so using a GPC with something like a 9mm will give me a range of mid and high powers for lunar and solar which is mainly where I use them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stu said:

I know. Not bothered about low power, I prefer single widefield eyepieces for that, so using a GPC with something like a 9mm will give me a range of mid and high powers for lunar and solar which is mainly where I use them.

I have 18.5 mm LE and 24 mm UFF for BV viewing, thinking of getting some 12.5 mm LE's or 10 mm UFF's. I suspect for planetary viewing BV will be more beneficial, similar route to you. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stu said:

Two questions Alan….

How did you cut the hole?

60mm? Do you have little T-Rex hands? 😉

A hole saw, Starrett with cutting fluid applied as it cut, took a while.

Hmmm, will measure and confirm.

Did T-Rex have hands?

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly @Stu I agree T-Rex have hands, the picture bears this out, but in my defence my hands are not alike 😉

71o4jHUAjVL._AC_SL1500_.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And back to Astronomy.....

The hole I made was actually 70mm, I have measured it and taken some images.
It works very well indeed and was a simple change to the riser column,
But please note my column was cut down from a longer one, the remaining bit now resides with @AdeKing

IMG_3144.thumb.JPG.5febf80baf154ef8568ac12e8bc0ed7c.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_3147.thumb.JPG.f67505421f5a9de819666eac1c6841c9.JPG

Edited by Alan White
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.