Jump to content

NGC7000 and M39


barbulo

Recommended Posts

Two targets in two clear nights, both with SW 200PDS + 600D unmodded + MPCC from a Bortle 6+. Coma can be seen in the upper left corner of both images (collimation is driving me crazy).

  • (A section of) NGC7000 - North America nebulae: 40 subs @ 180s/ISO1600 + 15 flats + 20 bias; stacked with DSS and processed with PS.  Too narrow FOV for the target, but since it was up high, I decided to give it a try. 

NGC7000_PS2.thumb.jpg.1adaff9ab45c699230b2a795c3085ab4.jpg

NGC7000.TIF

  • M39: 18 subs @ 180s/ISO1600 + 15 flats + 20 bias; stacked with DSS and processed with PS.

M39_PS.thumb.jpg.0dbb664b661b14453489bed77543f48f.jpg
M39.TIF

Comments will be more than welcome. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking good!

Have you thought about getting the 600D astro modded? I also use a 600D at the moment and the astro mod (Mine has had one of the IR filters removed I believe) makes a massive difference when imaging rich Ha nebula like the NA nebula. Well worth the investment if you're going to stick with the 600D for any length of time.

Bizzarely, I think I actually imaged the same two targets with the same camera on the same night :D

Edited by Iem1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I read the 600D has a sweet spot of ISO 800. Perhaps it performs a little bit different when unmodded, but I only use 1600 with 30 second subs to find targets, then straight back to ISO 800 when imaging. I find 1600 tends to wash out my images a bit too much, even under dark skies.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes @Iem1, I would like to mod it some day. It will surely make a difference with nebulas.  

Regarding the ISO, I also read about 800 as the sweet spot for the 600D, but I decided to use 1600 for fainter objects. It will be a matter of trying and checking.

However, I'm greatly concerned about the remaining coma. It annoys me a lot. Yesterday I tried to re-collimate the telescope but it seems I cannot get rid of the artifact. I'm starting thinking that the MPCC has something to do with it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.