Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

Recommended Posts

I have a C5 sct a ED80 and a RCT 8" f/8, I also use a canon 600da and a asi120 as a guide scope and I wish to photograph as many objects in the sky as my setup would allow. I've been doing 10-20 3min subs on each object and the weather has been kind enough recently so I have a fair bit now but I'm running out of the bigger ones. The obvious method is just cropping in processing but that would give less detail, a good example of the perfect size is crescent nebula. A bad example is basically anything that takes up less than 10% of the picture like the box galaxy cluster, eskimo nebula, fetus, snowball, cat's eye etc. I tried a 2x barlow on my rct but I need so many extension tubes that it would cause many problems, maybe a dedicated CCD camera will have a shorter fov?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bigger aperture telescope with longer focal length (hope f number stays low). Better camera (dedicated astro CCD - can crop to smaller targets without losing too much detail). Better guide camera to deal with longer focal length telescope. Better mount to handle the increased payload. Lots of moonless, cloudless, windless skies and a very big wallet to pay for it all!!!! 

If I was to upgrade to achieve better imaging smaller DSO's then I would consider:

SW250PDS reflector telescope. EQ6-R Mount (belt driven). ASI2600MC camera (or ASI1600 at least). But up to you on OSC or Mono(+filter) cameras.

Can't think of a guide camera (can anyone else suggest one for the above).

Consider RORO Observatory??

That's off the top of my head for the main components.

Gerr.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Gerr said:

If I was to upgrade to achieve better imaging smaller DSO's then I would consider:

SW250PDS reflector telescope. EQ6-R Mount (belt driven). ASI2600MC camera (or ASI1600 at least). But up to you on OSC or Mono(+filter) cameras.

I have an eq6 pro, i am currently deciding whether or not to upgrade to the rowan belt mod as every other image I take is unusable

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Quetzalcoatl72 said:

I've been doing 10-20 3min subs on each object

I suppose it depends on what you are trying to achieve, but 30-60 minutes total integration time doesn’t seem very long for each image?

 

1 hour ago, Quetzalcoatl72 said:

i am currently deciding whether or not to upgrade to the rowan belt mod as every other image I take is unusable

This doesn’t seems right. I had an EQ6 pro and it really didn’t drop any subs due to the mount itself, but depending on the load, the wind would have an effect. 300s-600s were my normal duration.  I did the rowan belt and this improved the mount a little, reducing backlash etc. But I wouldn’t do the mod until you have worked out why you are losing 50% of your subs.

1 hour ago, Gerr said:

SW250PDS reflector telescope. EQ6-R Mount (belt driven).

Unless it’s calm, there is a good chance you will lose quite a few subs, been there done that, but in the dome it’s perfect.  The image scale is pretty low at 0.64”/px, not sure how the EQ6 would work out. But I love my SW250, it’s my galaxy imaging scope. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I read from the experienced guys on this forum, going below 1"/px is a waste of time for most people (with typical skies) as the seeing just will not allow you to use a resolution that high most of the time (or ever?!)

From what I found online, the pixels in your current camera are 4.3um, which gives you a sampling rate of 0.55"/px with the RC8 at native FL, which is already a very high sampling rate - it is unlikely the atmosphere will allow you to make full use of this resolution.

You may therefore consider binning your data in post; I'm not sure how easy this is to do with DSLR/OSC data as I'm strictly a mono+filters guy, but I'm sure others on here can advise. In an oversampled image, binning is preferable to just cropping away as it will increase your SNR - if you were to bin your images x2, this would take your resolution to 1.1"/px, which would probably be a good sampling rate.

The next thing you could do to improve your images would simply be more integration time. I've recently been using this online calculator to help me decide how long to spend on various targets, which I've found really useful: https://snrcalc.vercel.app/home

If you were interested in purchasing some new equipment, then I'd suggest a dedicated astro camera - l think this would give you a bigger benefit than a new scope, but happy to be corrected by anyone more knowledgeable than myself in this regard. In terms of which camera, well, that's a whole other thread in itself! 😉

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, tooth_dr said:

I suppose it depends on what you are trying to achieve, but 30-60 minutes total integration time doesn’t seem very long for each image?

 

This doesn’t seems right. I had an EQ6 pro and it really didn’t drop any subs due to the mount itself, but depending on the load, the wind would have an effect. 300s-600s were my normal duration.  I did the rowan belt and this improved the mount a little, reducing backlash etc. But I wouldn’t do the mod until you have worked out why you are losing 50% of your subs.

Unless it’s calm, there is a good chance you will lose quite a few subs, been there done that, but in the dome it’s perfect.  The image scale is pretty low at 0.64”/px, not sure how the EQ6 would work out. But I love my SW250, it’s my galaxy imaging scope. 

I'm pretty sure it's the gears, i can hear coffee grinding and knocking, the image wobbles pretty bad on rate 2*, second idea is the ground, it's not very stable. Waiting for a dry day without aclear night so i can fill 3 large holes full of cement and gravel in my garden as it would e much better than what i have atm. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Puffafish
      Over the winter I got into playing with a phone mount on my telescope eyepiece and got some pictures of the moon... But not much else as there are always limitations on what a phone camera can do (and how well I can align the camera to the eyepiece).
       
      If I was to upgrade to a camera to mount onto my scope, what should I be looking for? I have been tempted to give it a go with whatever I can find on ebay or similar, but don't want to buy something only to discover that it's lacking something important. The only thing I know to look for at the moment is to make sure there is a suitable mounting ring for the camera (a T ring I believe they're called).
       
      My targets will probably be: Orion nebular, Jupiter and Saturn to start with. This is purely because these are targets I know I can find.
       
      Scope: Skywatcher Explorer 130P (650mm focal length, 130mm diameter)
    • By Btmackd
      I have a CPC 800 Edge HD as well as an Orion Starshoot Autoguider.  I recently ordered a ZWO ASI294 MC Pro colour camera.  In terms of the auto guide function I had planned on using PHD2 (which I already downloaded onto my Mac laptop).   In terms of researching software that would allow for control of the camera I understand there are a number of options. I considered purchasing an ASIair, however, I understand that is not compatible with the Orion Starshoot Autoguider, and therefore I would need to replace that with a ZWO.  I am hesitant to want to do that, even though it would be convenient not to have to bother with laptop connectivity.  Right now I've been using my iPhone for goto functionality with Starsense and Skyportal wifi.  I understand there are a number of options available for Windows based PCs in terms of control of camera and image acquisition.  BackyardEOS (for DSLR cameras), Astrophotography Tool, and Nebulosity.  These seem to be the most popular.  However, it looks to me as though APT is just for Windows based PC.  As well, not sure the extent to which Nebulosity is seamless when it comes to Mac compatibility.  Is there a recommended Image Acquisition software for Mac users?  Is a Windows PC laptop dedicated for astrophotography the best approach (e.g. second hand etc)?  I would appreciate your recommendations.  Thanks
    • By thepainpastor
      Greetings All!
      Very Short Explanation: I'm disabled (43) and desperately trying to find ways to still bond/spend time with my youngest son (13).
       
      My son expressed an interest, about two months ago, in Astronomy after watching a few YouTube videos on the subject (specifically, the moon and our neighboring planets). He asked if one day we could get a telescope. I was somewhat surprised when, over the course of the following days/weeks, he didn't forget about his request or shift his attention to other, "more 13 year old pressing matters." In fact, he became increasingly MORE excited, despite our lack of progress on the subject (except for many hours of questions and research regarding all things space).
      So, I decided that somehow, someway, I would discover the means in which to make this dream of his a reality.  However, due to our financial situation, I wasn't sure it would ever happen. Well, lo and behold, I stumbled across a Vivitar 76700 Reflecting Telescope, while killing time before a drs appt, at the local Goodwill, for only $14.99. I immediately withdrew my "Emergency $20" from my wallet, and I purchased it! 
      When I finally arrived home, I began the process of putting it together. Unfortunately, I soon discovered that it lacked everything which is placed in the "lens hole/slot" on the top, back of the telescope (just a hole, no lens, barrel, or anything originally included to fill said hole.
      !!!EDIT/CORRECTION!!!: It DOES have the piece which screws onto the side of the telescope that has "adjustor knobs" below it for, I'm assuming, extending/retracting the lens(?). There is just nothing INSIDE this piece except a hole/space. Sorry! 
      This is our youngest son (13), who is a "loner." He is very quiet/shy/lacks self-confidence, and suffers from mental/learning disabilities, but truly is "sharp as a tack" in many, many ways. So, when we discover something, anything, educationally speaking, that peaks his interest, we try our hardest to encourage him! 
      Now, I don't really have any/much money to spend on getting this telescope in complete working order (I am NOT asking or soliciting for ANYTHING!!) , but I refuse to pass up this chance to bond with him, encourage this budding passion for Astronomy, and help get him OFF that blasted PlayBoxCube more frequently, and into something more beneficial for his young, developing mind!
      Now to my question(s)...
      What further (inexpensive) equipment would suffice in completing his new-to-us telescope, and increase his allure to the wonders awaiting his discovery in the heavens above? Quality vs Price? Trade-offs? On-topic/slightly off-specific-topic advice?
      Links, articles, groups, periodicals, videos...ANY suggestions gratefully welcomed!
      Thank you, in advance, for indulging my attempted-to-be-brief background/relevant personal info, and for taking the time to help this guy be a (better) dad again. I feel blessed to have found this particular site/group.
      Live Long & Prosper,
      -Larry 
       
       
    • By Planetarian
      Just thinking how this setup would compare to normal astrophotography setups. Imagine a Nikon coolpix p1000 on an equatorial mount. Has anyone done that yet? 
      As I saw in the YouTube videos about the camera, it has absolutely no chromatic aberration, so I assume it's got apochromatic lens. It's magnification is extremely good (125x with 16MP sensor). The aperture is quite small tho compared to many different refractors available. 
       
      So what do you think about the idea:  astrophotography with a Nikon?  
    • By FireNIceFly
      Hello, 
      I've been into astronomy since I was young and more recently astrophotography. I've just (finally) got my new telescope, a Celestron AVX 9.25" Edge HD with various accessories including a reducer lens. I'm still trying to get the auto guider up and running as that's being a pain and need to get a dew heater for the telescope (currently lookjng for a decent one). I'm also looking into what filters to get as well as that's still fairly new to me, at least for the astrophotography side. 
      I'm also very much into microscopy and looking at microphotography, I'm currently saving up to get a new microscope. 
      I've also got a facebook group where I share astronomy and science news, where members can share astronomy and science news or their own astro or science images, discuss things, etc. https://www.facebook.com/groups/2494142714158646/?ref=share
      Anyway, hello to all from Cambridge, UK :-) 
       
      Adz



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.