Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b6007b69ccdf5c69bf18273ddfe023df.jpg

Takahashi FC-100 and FC-76 advice


Recommended Posts

The Tak 76 is a handle, and I've not yet needed a handle for either of my FC100D's. They are so cute I can just cradle them in my arms. Takahashi do offer a handle though, which attaches to an optional accessory ring at the lower end of the tube. FLO sell the accessory ring for the FC100D's but I'm not sure about the handle or the finder bracket attachment. Perhaps special order?

 

 

1966997172_2020-04-0112_29_48.png.2c06a135e44b4742127c8d892bf1510f.png

1831002402_2020-04-0112_30_36.png.1c533fa8e07a58a9d7f08f6eaef15e92.png

1093715410_2020-04-0112_30_10.png.110b4b5ad9f4437cf7b4817c478495ea.png

Edited by mikeDnight
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikeDnight said:

The Tak 76 is a handle, and I've not yet needed a handle for either of my FC100D's. They are so cute I can just cradle them in my arms. Takahashi do offer a handle though, which attaches to an optional accessory ring at the lower end of the tube. FLO sell the accessory ring for the FC100D's but I'm not sure about the handle or the fonder bracket attachment. Perhaps special order?

 

 

1966997172_2020-04-0112_29_48.png.2c06a135e44b4742127c8d892bf1510f.png

1831002402_2020-04-0112_30_36.png.1c533fa8e07a58a9d7f08f6eaef15e92.png

1093715410_2020-04-0112_30_10.png.110b4b5ad9f4437cf7b4817c478495ea.png

I bought a handle from Astroshop a few years ago that I used on my FS 102

But it was red and the colour difference upset me so I took it off.

I agree that the FC 100 is in arm cuddle territory. So is the TSA, but not necessarily for carrying 🤣

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dweller25 said:

That’s just not right John 😂😂😂

No, you are right. It does not cost enough for the Tak mob ! :lol:

I seem to be able to get by without handles on my refractors :dontknow:

Being OCD must be a pain to live with - I'm glad that I'm not bothered by that sort of thing.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, John said:

No, you are right. It does not cost enough for the Tak mob ! :lol:

I seem to be able to get by without handles on my refractors :dontknow:

Being OCD must be a pain to live with - I'm glad that I'm not bothered by that sort of thing.

 

OCD - Obsessive Cuddling Disorder ?  😂

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jetstream said:

Ive just ordered a second clamshell for the TSA120 🥴 I'm terryfied she'll fall off 😬

 

 

:grin:

Gerry, please tell me we don’t need to change your forum name to 25585?? 😱😱😱

BA99C073-10ED-4F08-A861-C1F8592F1541.jpeg

AD6D8C1A-682B-410E-88CD-32523EE1799E.jpeg

4F2FAE96-3DF9-4582-A721-AD46CF8A130E.jpeg

AC0B3944-9AC0-4859-9C23-D28754B13B28.jpeg

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stu said:

Gerry, please tell me we don’t need to change your forum name to 25585?? 😱😱😱

BA99C073-10ED-4F08-A861-C1F8592F1541.jpeg

AD6D8C1A-682B-410E-88CD-32523EE1799E.jpeg

4F2FAE96-3DF9-4582-A721-AD46CF8A130E.jpeg

AC0B3944-9AC0-4859-9C23-D28754B13B28.jpeg

I was just thinking that. We gave him a really tough time over those arrangements :rolleyes2:

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Stu said:

Gerry, please tell me we don’t need to change your forum name to 25585?? 😱😱

Call me what you want as long as you guys can convince the wife to let me have another Tak 😀

I'm looking to complete a Tak eyepiece set and have the mouse quivering over a 13mm Nagler right now...always wanted one of these.:thumbsup:

and yes, shes working right now :evil6:

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jetstream said:

Call me what you want as long as you guys can convince the wife to let me have another Tak 😀

I'm looking to complete a Tak eyepiece set and have the mouse quivering over a 13mm Nagler right now...always wanted one of these.:thumbsup:

and yes, shes working right now :evil6:

Which Tak are you wanting now Gerry? TOA150????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Stu said:

Gerry, please tell me we don’t need to change your forum name to 25585?? 😱😱😱

BA99C073-10ED-4F08-A861-C1F8592F1541.jpeg

AD6D8C1A-682B-410E-88CD-32523EE1799E.jpeg

4F2FAE96-3DF9-4582-A721-AD46CF8A130E.jpeg

AC0B3944-9AC0-4859-9C23-D28754B13B28.jpeg

I want to make it very clear that I was definitely joking about putting a handle on two clamshells......

Not sure about Gerry though 😂😂

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dweller25 said:

I want to make it very clear that I was definitely joking about putting a handle on two clamshells......

Not sure about Gerry though 😂

:unsure: Wot!!

I've just ordered them both!!

:ph34r:

Edited by jetstream
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jetstream said:

I wonder if I can ask this on this thread- for the Taks @ 7.5 I wonder if the Pentax 40mm XW is good- whats the new "R" designation? I hope it means little field curvature.

That’s a question I would like to know the answer to too Gerry. FC has always put me off these long focal length Pentax eyepieces, but that may not need to be the case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John said:

I was just thinking that. We gave him a really tough time over those arrangements :rolleyes2:

 

I think perhaps a little too much of a tough time. He's a really nice chap and loves his refractors, but I suspect SGL humour may not have been recieved as it was intended. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jetstream said:

wonder if I can ask this on this thread- for the Taks @ 7.5 I wonder if the Pentax 40mm XW is good- whats the new "R" designation? I hope it means little field curvature.

 

1 hour ago, Stu said:

That’s a question I would like to know the answer to too Gerry. FC has always put me off these long focal length Pentax eyepieces, but that may not need to be the case.

I’ve got the Pentax XW30 and a Tak FC-76DCU, but haven’t yet tried them together and examined closely for FC. I’ll try next time I’m out, as I’m also considering the XW40 to complete the set again 👍

I can confirm there is noticeable FC on the this scope when using both the XW14 and XW20.

I do also have the Tak 1.04x Flattener, but I can only get this to focus with 1.25” diagonal and eyepieces, otherwise I’d check if that helped with FC too. It was really for photography but have tried it visually too on the FS-60CB, and works well.

 

Edited by HollyHound
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jetstream said:

Eagerly waiting! :icon_bounce:

Ok, just popped out for 20mins to check this one thing...

Unfortunately, I can report that with the XW30 on my FC-76DCU, there is noticeable FC in about the outer 30% of the field. If I focussed on stars towards the edge and then moved those back to the centre, they would become blurry and vice versa.

I do also see astigmatism, but that’s because I have removed my Dioptrx to test on another eyepiece and have found my eyes have about 0.75 dioptre of astigmatism anyway.

When using the Panoptic 24, I see neither FC or astigmatism in this scope.

If I can find a way to get focus then I will try with my Tak Flattener, but given I’m already using a Baader T2 BBHS mirror diagonal, that might be tricky.

The only thing to bear in mind. Is that supposedly the XW40 has less FC than the XW30 🤔

Hope this helps.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.