Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Solar Image 7th March 2021 Baader K-Line


Nigella Bryant

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Highburymark said:

Really nice Nigella. Could you briefly explain your set up - you’re getting some lovely surface detail from that filter.

PS - nice to remotely meet you the other week on the Solarchat meeting.

Hi, it was really nice to meet up on zoom and put names to face's. 

For the K-Line I use a 80mm ed refractor@ f6.8 which I reduce with an aperture mask to 60mm because of the wavelength. Mark on solarchat suggested that I do that and it does make a difference. I use a Lunt hershal wedge with a ND1.8 filter instead of the installed ND3. I place a 0.5 reducer in the mix with the Baader K-Line filter. I use a Zwo ASI 178mm on both the HA and Baader K-Line scope's. 

Hope this makes sense.

IMG_20210306_114036.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Nigella Bryant said:

Hi, it was really nice to meet up on zoom and put names to face's. 

For the K-Line I use a 80mm ed refractor@ f6.8 which I reduce with an aperture mask to 60mm because of the wavelength. Mark on solarchat suggested that I do that and it does make a difference. I use a Lunt hershal wedge with a ND1.8 filter instead of the installed ND3. I place a 0.5 reducer in the mix with the Baader K-Line filter. I use a Zwo ASI 178mm on both the HA and Baader K-Line scope's. 

Hope this makes sense.

IMG_20210306_114036.jpg

Thanks for the info. Impressed at what can be achieved.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, michael.h.f.wilkinson said:

Nice images with great detail. Am I right in thinking the Baader K-line filter is wider in spectral transmission than the Lunt Ca-K modules?

Hi, yes, much wider than the Lunt CA-K module. Nonetheless it's a good filter for the price compared to the Lunt. It's pretty much like a higher contrast of the continuum filter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Nigella Bryant said:

Hi, yes, much wider than the Lunt CA-K module. Nonetheless it's a good filter for the price compared to the Lunt. It's pretty much like a higher contrast of the continuum filter. 

I was considering one of these filters until I got a bonus for working 25 years at the University of Groningen. That allowed me to go for the Lunt (one of the comparatively rare pieces of new kit I own). They are very pricey. I have heard of people double-stacking the K-line filter to get a narrower band. Would that help, do you think?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, michael.h.f.wilkinson said:

I was considering one of these filters until I got a bonus for working 25 years at the University of Groningen. That allowed me to go for the Lunt (one of the comparatively rare pieces of new kit I own). They are very pricey. I have heard of people double-stacking the K-line filter to get a narrower band. Would that help, do you think?

Hi, yes, that's my idea eventually, when I too get the Lunt CA-K module. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, michael.h.f.wilkinson said:

I have heard of people double-stacking the K-line filter to get a narrower band. Would that help, do you think?

Heheh - I haven't! But it is theoretically possible? You'd have to work out light
levels (obviously) - Each *DS* CaK equivalent to an ND2 filter (If I remember?). 🤔
The superposition of gaussians should give you a (calculable!) improvement...

Aside: Even saw "peak minus wings" subtractions with "nearby" near-UV filter!
(All very "Particle Physics", I thought! lol.) The only prob I had with my DS CaK
was inter-filter ghosting reflections - Notably with mirror scopes (MAK 150). 🙃

I [too] sense that once-planned REAL CaK scope receding into the distance. 😐
 

Edited by Macavity
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Macavity said:

Heheh - I haven't! But it is theoretically possible? You'd have to work out light
levels (obviously) - Each *DS* CaK equivalent to an ND2 filter (If I remember?). 🤔
The superposition of gaussians should give you a (calculable!) improvement...

Aside: Even saw "peak minus wings" subtractions with "nearby" near-UV filter!
(All very "Particle Physics", I thought! lol.) The only prob I had with my DS CaK
was inter-filter ghosting reflections - Notably with mirror scopes (MAK 150). 🙃

I [too] sense that once-planned REAL CaK scope receding into the distance. 😐
 

Much depends on the exact shape of the passband. Double-stacking two H-alpha filters generally gives a 1.4x reduction of bandpass, as you would expect from Gaussian profiles. If however the bandpass has a roughly square profile, the resulting passband will not be much narrower. Much also depends on the centre transmission. If it is near 95% the result will be a maximum transmission of around 90%  (0.95 squared). If it is much lower, the image will be much dimmed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, michael.h.f.wilkinson said:

Much depends on the exact shape of the passband. Double-stacking two H-alpha filters generally gives a 1.4x reduction of bandpass, as you would expect from Gaussian profiles. If however the bandpass has a roughly square profile, the resulting passband will not be much narrower. Much also depends on the centre transmission. If it is near 95% the result will be a maximum transmission of around 90%  (0.95 squared). If it is much lower, the image will be much dimmed.

I love experimenting with equipment so as I'm eventually going to buy a Lunt CA-K module and I've already got a baader k-line filter what's to loose, lol. I've been experimenting with light path today with a hershal wedge+ ND3/ND1.8 with one or the other + 0.5 reducer+ the Baader K-Line filter without Baader K-Line filter in different positions of the light path to get the largest disk possible with the Zwo ASI 178mm. 

The results are:- Hershal wedge + ND1.8 + 0.5 reducer + Baader K-Line filter. 

I've got a hydrogen alpha 7nm filter that I'm going to put in the mix instead of the Baader K-Line filter just because I can, lol.

After all science is about experimenting isn't it. As long as we're very, very careful with our eyesight what's to loose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Nigella Bryant said:

I love experimenting with equipment so as I'm eventually going to buy a Lunt CA-K module and I've already got a baader k-line filter what's to loose, lol. I've been experimenting with light path today with a hershal wedge+ ND3/ND1.8 with one or the other + 0.5 reducer+ the Baader K-Line filter without Baader K-Line filter in different positions of the light path to get the largest disk possible with the Zwo ASI 178mm. 

The results are:- Hershal wedge + ND1.8 + 0.5 reducer + Baader K-Line filter. 

I've got a hydrogen alpha 7nm filter that I'm going to put in the mix instead of the Baader K-Line filter just because I can, lol.

After all science is about experimenting isn't it. As long as we're very, very careful with our eyesight what's to loose. 

Double stacking a Lunt Ca-K module (1 nm bandpass) with a Baader K-line filter (8 nm bandpass according to Baader) should not have any discernible effect on passband, but can reduce overall throughput. What does help a lot in imaging in Ca-K is the use of an ERF that transmits Ca-K, to reduce heat and therefore turbulence in the optical tube. I was lucky enough to get a second-hand Beloptik Tri-Band ERF (apparently, there are only six of these), which transmits bands around Ca-K, Solar Continuum and H-alpha, but I gather that Aries Instruments makes dual band ERFs.

post-5655-0-81738800-1449167864_thumb.jpg

Triple_bandpass_ERF_1.gif

I really notice an improvement in sharpness if I install the ERF.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.