Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_annual.thumb.jpg.3fc34f695a81b16210333189a3162ac7.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

Looks like I will get some favourable weather in the coming days, but the moon is out and full. I finally have a car so I can get away from light polluted Weymouth, and tonight I took a drive and found a great spot to shoot (see image).
So to the point, I want to shoot Andromeda during these moonlit nights since the moon will be directly behind me. How much will it still affect my images?
I'm still a beginner, using a Nikon Z50 and the 50-250mm kit lens @250 (F6.3), but I do have a Star Adventurer now, so I'll go out and shoot if nothing for the practice (my polar alignments have been pretty good).

Untitled.png

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't end up with as many subs as I would have liked due to my inexperience, but it turned out okay. Just goes to show, I doesn't matter how many YouTube videos you watch, actually going out there is much more valuable.

M31_4.jpg

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

No moon Friday, but not as many subs as I would have liked due to clouds rolling in. But I'm happy with this M31. This little Nikon Z50 and kit lens really is good. Last night was completely clear, so I thought I'd see what this un-modded camera could do with the Rosette, wow, not a bad 1st attempt.

M31_5.jpg

Rosette V2.jpg

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, LeeHore7 said:

They are fantastic images, how many subs and settings on both images did you have. The rosette nebula with your unmoded dslr is fantastic 👌

I didn't use any darks, just flats, as the lens produces a heavy vignette. For M31 I only had 36 useable (as I said the clouds rolled in) 90secs @ ISO1600, and I had 70-80 for the Rosette, same exposure settings as M31.
Yeah this mirrorless Nikon Z50 is a gem. Just did a little more processing on M31, using StarNet to do some star reduction, it maybe too much for some, but I like it.
 

M31_5a.jpg

Edited by Cobberwebb
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Here's a shot of my setup.

Nikon Z50, 50-250mm kit lens F4.4-F6.3
Star Adventurer
Benro Mach3 Tripod
Spare mobile phone using qDslrDashboard (USB tethered), a cheapo cycle mount to attach it to the tripod.
COOWOO lens warmer
2 USB power banks (1 to power the star tracker, 1 for the lens warmer)

20210225_221147.jpg

Edited by Cobberwebb
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Cobberwebb said:

I didn't use any darks, just flats, as the lens produces a heavy vignette. For M31 I only had 36 useable (as I said the clouds rolled in) 90secs @ ISO1600, and I had 70-80 for the Rosette, same exposure settings as M31.
Yeah this mirrorless Nikon Z50 is a gem. Just did a little more processing on M31, using StarNet to do some star reduction, it maybe too much for some, but I like it.
 

M31_5a.jpg

Thank you for sharing your settings, it's interesting you didn't take any darks, that'll bring the taking time of the calibration frames down , I may experiment with this. I often use starnett ++ when processing DSOs as you can alter the nebulosity and dust lanes much easier. Your images aspire me for when my SA will arrive using my dslr and tamron 70-300mm lens. I love your images and your set up in the previous photographs is very portable which is what I'm looking at, so I can walk to dome dark sites around here and a couple of miles to the cliffs for wide field imaging. Hopefully when my evostar 72ed is delivered I can get some nice images. Keep up the good work, clear skies 👍

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, LeeHore7 said:

Thank you for sharing your settings, it's interesting you didn't take any darks, that'll bring the taking time of the calibration frames down , I may experiment with this. I often use starnett ++ when processing DSOs as you can alter the nebulosity and dust lanes much easier. Your images aspire me for when my SA will arrive using my dslr and tamron 70-300mm lens. I love your images and your set up in the previous photographs is very portable which is what I'm looking at, so I can walk to dome dark sites around here and a couple of miles to the cliffs for wide field imaging. Hopefully when my evostar 72ed is delivered I can get some nice images. Keep up the good work, clear skies 👍

You're welcome and thank you.
It seems that darks and bias frames are only more necessary when you really pump up the ISO and for dedicated astro cameras taking 3+min exposures. Flats are an absolutely must have.
My Nikon Z50 has limited battery life and I've found that not taking darks has made little difference, if any. Plus there are no Z50 spare batteries in stock anywhere at the moment, and they're £50-60 a pop.
I've only just purchased a car, after 6 years without one, to enable me to travel to darker areas. I used to lug this kit around on my electric bicycle, but that can only get you so far. Now I can sit in the car watching YouTube vids while I wait :)

I've been trialing Pixinsight, and it looks like I will be purchasing it soon, it's definitely making a difference. Then next on my list is probably the William Optics Zenithstar 61, unless I see something else. Good bye, money.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cobberwebb said:

It seems that darks and bias frames are only more necessary when you really pump up the ISO and for dedicated astro cameras taking 3+min exposures. Flats are an absolutely must have

I'm definitely going to try this next time as my max iso on my Canon 450d is 1600 so a good experiment by just taking flats along with the lights, I do take darks normally, bias as well as these are only quick as flats. Thanks again. Astrophotography the hobby that just keeps taking 😉, the slippery slope ensues for both of us. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Hi, great pics!!! I'm seriously looking at getting the Z50 in my beginning astrophotography journey.  I'm also thinking of getting a bigger mount like the HEQ5 but you seem to be getting great shots with the Star Adventurer and no guiding.  Really impressive.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 29/04/2021 at 21:23, Mamm7215 said:

Hi, great pics!!! I'm seriously looking at getting the Z50 in my beginning astrophotography journey.  I'm also thinking of getting a bigger mount like the HEQ5 but you seem to be getting great shots with the Star Adventurer and no guiding.  Really impressive.  

Just see if there are spare batteries available as they don't last that long. I've since sold my Z50 and moved to a Z6.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Andonie
      Gear Used:
      - Nikon D3300
      - Celestron Astromaster 130EQ
      - T-ring + Barlow x2
      I will explain this as briefly as possible.
      Because I cannot photograph in direct focus with my telescope and camera, I have to use the x2. when there is a full moon, it does not enter the frame, it comes out around the edges, so I think I should make a mosaic.
      The problem is that I do not have a motorized mount, so anileation is critical.
      The problem with PIPP is that it does not correct the rotation of the moon, so it does not work for me.
      I aligned the photos in Photoshop, and exported them in tiff.
      I then moved them to Autostakkert! 3 and it stacked without any problem. Use 40% of the best frames.
      Finally, I use RegiStax6, and when using the waveletes, as seen in the image, it generates an incredibly loud noise. I don't understand what I'm doing wrong, is it RegiStax, is it AS! 3 or is it Photoshop.

      (Errors are clearly seen in the lower part of the product because I do not have a mount, but it has happened to me in other images and the same does not happen with the noise.)
      I do not understand and I am desperate as it is horrible not being able to photograph a full moon decently.
      I urgently need someone to help me. I put all the general details for you to understand, if you need to know more, please let me know. a greeting.
      (below demonstrative image)

    • By luvalezim
      Hello.
      My name is Luiza, I am a student of Computer Engineering in São Paulo, Brazil and I would like to ask for your help.
      As yesterday was the super pink moon day, I, at about 22:50, decided to take several photos of the moon using my phone and my non-digital telescope. And, analyzing the photos now, I realized that in some of them there are certain objects that I can't say exactly what they are. Could you help me identify them, please? I am not sure if they are satellites, ISS, Hubble, etc ... and I am very intrigued by themphotos.rar.
      P.S: the objects are in the lower left corner of the images






    • By StarPrincess
      Moon Surface with AstroDinsk
      23 April 2021 21:35
      Celestron Nexstar 6SE
      ZWO ASI astrocamera 462mc
       
    • By Astrodinsk
      Moon panorama Date: 02/21/2021 Time: 20:12 +03.00 Height: 64 degrees In the constellation Taurus Lit: 69% Telescope: Sky-Watcher 150 / 750PDS Camera: ZWO ASI462MC Mount: Sky-Watcher Heq5 ProSynScan Panorama from 4 fragments Videos for 120 seconds Resolution: 1936x1096 Exposure time: 2ms Gain: 0 73FPS Added 250 frames from 8855 Software: Shooting in FireCapture Build: Autostackert 3.1.4 Wavelets and deconvolution: AstroSurface Panorama: Microsoft ICE Post-processing: Photoshop
    • By StarPrincess
      Moon Surface 16 April 2021 21:32 Celestron NexStar 6SE ZWO ASI 462mc
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.