Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

Recommended Posts

Good day fellow gazers at the sky! I recently joined and i would just like to say how wonderful everyone is (a special shout out to George Gearless)!

 Can anyone suggest a good reflector within my budget shown in the title? While i'm here i'd just like to say about the app, Nightshift. It is proffesional, clear and tellls you when to observe, and what you can see, for the next year! It also pinpoints your location exactly, so it is really accurate.https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.waddensky.nightshift. Anyway, that's me done! Thank you all so much for your time

Edited by Goldenmole
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I can (just) discern the Orion nebula with the naked-eye and from a light-polluted backyard. Obviously I can't see any detail at all, naked-eye but I can see it looks like a fuzzy smudge with a bright

As said by SpaceCadet even if you buy a Reflector with more aperture if you are looking in the wrong place you won't see M42 at all.  I have two refractors a 4"  and a 5" for the brighter galaxie

I'm an utter newbie. I find the orion nebula with ease. If you look at Orion's belt currently in winter it is south facing and tilts diagonally down to the left. There are 3 small  stars just below it

Are you sure you were looking in the right place "Orion's Nebula is not in the belt stars it is further down I had my Tal 100rs (100mm)  so only 20mm bigger and I could clearly see it. take a look at this if I am wrong and you where in the right place I apologise but from your post it does look like it.

https://skyandtelescope.org/observing/celestial-objects-to-watch/observing-the-great-orion-nebula/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, i can see what you guys were thinking, but this was while i wasn't actually looking AT the belt, more around it. Besides, as i said, i was considering it anyway.:-) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Goldenmole said:

Oh, i can see what you guys were thinking, but this was while i wasn't actually looking AT the belt, more around it. Besides, as i said, i was considering it anyway.:-) 

Mate, M42 is a big smudge in the sky as described in the diagram Wookie linked. So, yes we are thinking correctly. Even from a light polluted city, if pointed at the correct location it's easy to see with an 80mm refractor. Spending more money on a larger aperture won't make finding what are considered brighter objects any easier. 

If you typed something like, 'I found M42, but it looked washed out and seemed to be missing a lot of structure compared to descriptions, so I think I need a bit more aperture', then it would be apt to encourage you to spend money to see more objects and extra detail.

Edited by ScouseSpaceCadet
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can (just) discern the Orion nebula with the naked-eye and from a light-polluted backyard. Obviously I can't see any detail at all, naked-eye but I can see it looks like a fuzzy smudge with a bright centre. I'd agree you may not have been in the right place.

For your bugdet, if you really want one, you could get an 8" or so Dob. It'll be a beast, size-wise though, don't forget - compared to your refractor anyway.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

As said by SpaceCadet even if you buy a Reflector with more aperture if you are looking in the wrong place you won't see M42 at all. 

I have two refractors a 4"  and a 5" for the brighter galaxies and nebulas your 80mm would easily pick them up. 

I know you said you were considering anyway but IMHO I would try and find the objects with the refractor before getting the reflector otherwise you will come back and say I have 6" or 8" reflector and cannot see anything. 

Took me a while to find objects just need learn the sky and position of the objects may I suggest downloading Stellarium and using this to help you. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Goldenmole said:

Can anyone suggest a good reflector within my budget shown in the title?

Alright, back to the title subject.

It depends on your observing conditions.  Can you just walk out your backdoor and start observing or do you need to haul it up or down many stairs?  Does it need to fit in a car, a backpack, or on public transit?

There's not much in stock anywhere, but the top contenders tend to be various 6" or 8" Dobs, the 130 or 150 SW Heritage scopes, or the 130P and 130P-DS scopes on various mounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Louis D said:

Alright, back to the title subject.

It depends on your observing conditions.  Can you just walk out your backdoor and start observing or do you need to haul it up or down many stairs?  Does it need to fit in a car, a backpack, or on public transit?

There's not much in stock anywhere, but the top contenders tend to be various 6" or 8" Dobs, the 130 or 150 SW Heritage scopes, or the 130P and 130P-DS scopes on various mounts.

 Luckily, I can very easily just walk out my door and observe

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Goldenmole said:

 Luckily, I can very easily just walk out my door and observe

Then an 8" Dob, probably the Bresser 200p, would be your best bang for the buck.  You might never feel the need to go bigger for observing.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/02/2021 at 18:17, wulfrun said:

I can (just) discern the Orion nebula with the naked-eye and from a light-polluted backyard. Obviously I can't see any detail at all, naked-eye but I can see it looks like a fuzzy smudge with a bright centre. I'd agree you may not have been in the right place.

For your bugdet, if you really want one, you could get an 8" or so Dob. It'll be a beast, size-wise though, don't forget - compared to your refractor anyway.

I'm an utter newbie. I find the orion nebula with ease. If you look at Orion's belt currently in winter it is south facing and tilts diagonally down to the left. There are 3 small  stars just below it which make up "the sword". The centre of these 3 stars is the nebula and once you put any kind of scope on you should see it.

It took me a few seconds because you need your eyes to adjust but then it just pops out, a big grey smudge all around and you can usually see 2 or 3 stars in it actually. My 9yr old daughter insists she can see it in a pinky purple colour. I didn't believe her but she hasn't googled anything and apparently it's true that young kids can see it in colour

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BaldyMan said:

I'm an utter newbie. I find the orion nebula with ease. If you look at Orion's belt currently in winter it is south facing and tilts diagonally down to the left. There are 3 small  stars just below it which make up "the sword". The centre of these 3 stars is the nebula and once you put any kind of scope on you should see it.

It took me a few seconds because you need your eyes to adjust but then it just pops out, a big grey smudge all around and you can usually see 2 or 3 stars in it actually. My 9yr old daughter insists she can see it in a pinky purple colour. I didn't believe her but she hasn't googled anything and apparently it's true that young kids can see it in colour

Crossed wires? I too was pointing out just how easy it is to find. The OP has edited his post but he mentioned he could not see it, so myself and others suggested he's not looking in the right place.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, BaldyMan said:

I'm an utter newbie. I find the orion nebula with ease. If you look at Orion's belt currently in winter it is south facing and tilts diagonally down to the left. There are 3 small  stars just below it which make up "the sword". The centre of these 3 stars is the nebula and once you put any kind of scope on you should see it.

It took me a few seconds because you need your eyes to adjust but then it just pops out, a big grey smudge all around and you can usually see 2 or 3 stars in it actually. My 9yr old daughter insists she can see it in a pinky purple colour. I didn't believe her but she hasn't googled anything and apparently it's true that young kids can see it in colour

Really? That's incredible! I wonder how young you have to be?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Goldenmole said:

Really? That's incredible! I wonder how young you have to be?

There's a guy on YouTube called Astrobiscuit. He took his scope to a farm and the farmer's daughter claimed she could see it in purple too. I don't know how it works, I think it's something to do with the rods and cones in your eyes deteriorating with age.

My wife has glaucoma so astronomy is a no go for her, she got diagnosed at 27 which is really rare for her age at the time, but if/when I get a chance to speak to her eye specialist I'll ask the question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read that some have said the Orion Nebula has a greenish tinge.  To me it's always been off-white.

That is apart from one night with my 10 inch Dob when I saw a distinct bluish tinge.

Has anyone else seen any blue?

Edited by Second Time Around
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Second Time Around said:

I've read that some have said the Orion Nebula has a greenish tinge.  To me it's always been off-white.

That is apart from one night with my 10 inch Dob when I saw a distinct bluish tinge.

Has anyone seen any blue?

I'm afraid i haven't my friend. Wish i had!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a greenish tinge around the "fishes mouth" part of the nebula fairly often with my 12 inch dob. Very occasionally, when I've used a UHC filter I felt that I might have detected traces of a pink tinge as well but that might be the effect of the filter.

 

Edited by John
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, wookie1965 said:

I see blue/green tinge saw it better in the 8" I had but I do see it in my 5" Refractor but not as distinct. 

Ah so that would explain why i haven't seen it.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Second Time Around said:

I've read that some have said the Orion Nebula has a greenish tinge.  To me it's always been off-white.

That is apart from one night with my 10 inch Dob when I saw a distinct bluish tinge.

Has anyone else seen any blue?

I often see this nebula as grey & subtle green. Though my 12" dob. Also quite a large amount of detail.

Never seen blue though. For me the blue snowball nebula is exactly as it says on the tin. A tiny blue coloured ball. That's about the only target I have seen blue. Apart for Neptune of course.

👍

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By AlvinP
      Hello,
      I've been on these forums a couple of times for the last 2 weeks and ive found amazing advice, on telescopes, mounts and eyepiece. Besides reading countless of information on the internet about various equipments; pros and cons; and i got some queries about how to upgrade my setup.
      My original purchase was a 15x70 Celestron Binoculars last year, and boy ive seen amazing things with it, specially globular clusters, Jupiter and Saturn and the Orion's Nebula; for me these were amazing; i still use them given how easy it is to look at the sky with them and how bright and full everything looks.  A couple of months ago i got a 70x400mm Gskyer Telescope with an AZ mount (The cheap 99$ one that Amazon is displaying on all its adds for the last two months)  it came with a 25mm and a 10mm eyepieces as well as a x3 barlows (which i didnt even count as part of my scope as it is too bad quality and i havent managed a single decent view with it).

      Currently My Celestron Binoculars (x15) seem better for visualizing the sky than the 25mm eyepiece (x16) (things seem a very bit dimmer). And since the Barlow is a "no go", the 10mm (x40) eyepiece is what i really use, it has decent zoom and detailed views , it is my go to eyepiece most of the nights.
      However from reading all around, ive read that most of the stuff that come with the Telescope (aside from the scope itself) are actually really bad quality, specially no name brands without even webpage, so if i were to maximise my telescope i should update some of those items.
      -Recently i ordered a new Start diagonal to replace to default one (ive heard on Refractors its usually the weakest link next to eyepieces) as well as an economic x2 Barlow lens
      Keep in mind i recognize my 70mm cheap telescope will not suddendly become the Hubble Telescope, and that it doesnt matter how hard i push it, in the end such a low scope will be bound to hit its limit pretty fast, thats why i avoid 70$+ eyepieces and barlows for now.
      I expect to keep using this telescope for a good couple of months; at least until around August, when Jupiter and Saturn are more in the night sky, rather than morning.

      Now, im very satisfied with my current telescope; while the phone mount is garbage and the phone weight and the sound of my heartbeats pretty much shake the telescope out of position, as well as how cheap the mount is; it still gets the job done for seeing interesting stuff in the sky and i have managed to do some AP for some of the globular clusters, bunch of 1-2s images (with the wrong lens), not the best, not even good pictures; but decent overall for my equipment. I am currently interested in stargazing in general and some minor AP (as i dont have a camera, currently an Iphone 7s with the mount) Buuut im interested in borrowing a camera for the low sky photos without a telescope.
      I do most 97% of my Skywatching on my backyard, i live in a small country, there is some light pollution, but i can see the pleiades and the orion's nebula core on the naked eye most nights (so i guess its not that contaminated lol)
      Now; currently i like finding stuff by myself and show it to the other people around me who cant be bothered to find the moon in the sky, so setting up, finding and seeing stuff is part of what i like. 
      With all the above in mind..... Id like to plan ahead for my next purchases.
      First, im thinking a x3 barlow lens (to replace the original crappy one) and a 15mm lens (to have a bit better view than the 10mm, but less spread than the 25mm) in two or three months (with this id be able to check if my new eyepiece outperforms my default ones, but given the quality of the scope, i dont expect this to be noticeable).
      And Afterwards id love to get a new Scope, but im not quite sure what i want... and i would like some advice and help in choosing my next Scope upgrade.
      -I entered with and im liking the refractors; however i dont wanna spend 300-400$ on another refractor that is 20-30% better for triple the price
      -Ive heard really long focal lenght might bring some distortions; and also make the scope much bulkier, annnd most importantly i know that magnification is not everything; so a 1000mm long tube would prob bring too much magnifications for me to use properly on my backyard skies. So i think id settle for a maximum of 600-700mm.
      -Originally i was againts Newtonians in general, those inverted views scared me, i have a hard time of my own with my finderscope. Then i found out that Reflectors are the name of efficiency as they have more value per aperture than refractors; and as someone once mentioned "There is not really up and down in space, you will get used to it" annnd its true... save for references on the ground, like buildings, trees and mountains to help you locate where you are in the sky; once you are on it, you dont need right ups and downs.
      -I did see some 90mm Orion's Refractors as well as 90-102 Celestron Astromaster Refractors (these are 350-400$)
      -Im thinking a 130mm reflector is what im looking for; i think the 130mm aperture is a nice upgrade for my 70mm, and will keep me occupied for quite a long time; ive read about Orion SpaceProbe 130EQ and Celestron Astromaster 130EQ (ive also read, Power Seekers and Astromaster's are made out of pretty much garbage lol) Ive read that the main issue is the constant collimation required for them; but ive also read its something that can be learned and once you get used to it; its a pretty easy thing to do to keep getting amazing views.
      -Ive also seen people recommending  6-8'' Dobsonians; i know the deal with them; if anything i could aim for a 6'' one i found a litter under 300$ ive read they are amazing values for their aperture
      So, TL;DR: I have a 70x400mm Telescope, im new to stargazing, im really amazed and excited by what im seeing with my current scope, but would like an stable upgrade before the end of the year that will last me a year or two. I am interesteted both in regular and deep sky stargazing and astrophotography;  im not currently interested in an motorized mount; could deal with a regular Equatorial mount. But overall i am looking for  more aperture (100-150mm) to have clearer views; than focal lenght for zoom.

      Im also open to the fact that at one point i might have to get a scope for stargazing and another for AP; but would like an upgrade that could help me all around for both while i get initiated.
      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      Sorrry for the Huuuuuuuuge post, i was very excited while writing it; please let me know what you think and if there's anything else you'd want me to add to help understand my situation, thanks in advance!
       
       
    • By Lotinsh
      Hello, my budget is around 150/160 EUR, I was wondering what telescope should I buy? I need some suggestions as all I know is that bigger is better. I am currently looking at StarRider 80F400EQ, is it any good? Also I'm from Europe if that's relevant.
    • By Yannick
      I recently got the eq3-2 synscan mount to start with astrophotography. I first wanted to get the eq5 goto mount, but it is way out of my budget, and I could not find any good used ones that would fit my budget. Furthermore, I hear a lot of people talking about how eq3-2 is not that good for astrophotography, but what are some things I can do to improve the mount. Cheers guys.
    • By guydive
      Hey all,
      I'm considering the 250PDS. The main use is visual, and the second is EAA (I currently use a zwo183mm). 
      What I'm hesitant about is the primary focus. since It's mostly for visual, I'm wondering on how much back focus it has compared to the standard Skywatcher 10" dobsonians? with the standard dobsonias with the same optics and focuser you already need an extension tube for most eyepieces...
      Also, there's probably a "bigger" obstruction (bigger shadow on primary)? 
    • By Pincs
      Hi I've got an 8" dobsonian and I just got a dslr to connect to it. Obviously there's no tracking so what kind of things can I capture. Will I be able to do dso and planets?
      Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.