Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Finder scope safety harness


Spile

Recommended Posts

The findersope bracket and mount on the Skywatcher 200P has been (presumably) designed so that if the OTA is lifted using it, there is no danger of the finder and bracket becoming detached.

The problem is that unless the knurled screw is very tight, there is a danger that in the vertical position, the finder and bracket may fall from the OTA.

Once workaround I have read, is to drill a recess into the mount so that the screw sits into that. I did not want to risk voiding the warrantee by damaging my new telecope.

One suggestion I read was to turn the bracket 180 degrees and while that will stop the finder from dropping, it means that the finder coud come off the OTA if it was lifted. The finder and bracket will be safe in your hand but your OTA will be supported by justr your other hand!!!

My workaround is a safety harness using three plastic cable ties...

 

 

 

safety harness.jpg

Edited by Spile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmmm, I'd never lift an OTA by the finder as there's surely a risk of deforming the thin metal tube and then losing the finder alignment?

My TAL's are solid ally tube but I'd consider those far too heavy to risk doing that anyway. Surely the better solution would be to succumb to @johninderby's method and fit a handle?

Edited by DaveL59
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spile said:

The findersope bracket and mount on the Skywatcher 200P has been designed so that if the OTA is lifted using it, there is no danger of the finder and bracket becoming detached.

Is that statement from an actual official skywatcher document ?

Heather

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The finder harness is a very wise precaution...once, when removing a large cover off my 300p flex tube in the dark the finder slipped off and nearly fell into the fully extended OTA, which would undoubtably have caused grave consequences to the primary...I've secured it with wire to the bracket but cable ties are more neat.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Ceramus said:

The finder harness is a very wise precaution...once, when removing a large cover off my 300p flex tube in the dark the finder slipped off and nearly fell into the fully extended OTA, which would undoubtably have caused grave consequences to the primary...I've secured it with wire to the bracket but cable ties are more neat.

I agree that the safety harness could prove useful.

I pop my finder on and off my dob quite often though so it would probably get in the way for me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that has always seemed odd about most finder brackets is that they have a lttle block on the back of the bracket to stop the finder from going too far forward when it should be on the front to stop a finder from sliding backwards out of the shoe which would be more useful. 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, johninderby said:

One thing that has always seemed odd about most finder brackets is that they have a lttle block on the back of the bracket to stop the finder from going too far forward when it should be on the front to stop a finder from sliding backwards out of the shoe which would be more useful. 🤔

I'd wondered about that too ... seems daft to have the 'stop' at the back when a telescope is going to be angled up ... in the end I decided it might be there because if they did have it at the front, folk might just use the stop and not tighten the screw(s) , which would leave the finder not only loose and less accurate, but also likely to fall off when the assembly was packed away.

Heather

Edited by Tiny Clanger
typing finger slip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/01/2021 at 14:06, Tiny Clanger said:

Is that statement from an actual official skywatcher document ?

No it wasn't - good call.

 I have edited the post accordingly. However I still conclude that the reason that the finder base was deigned with the stop at the top rather than the bottom was to minimise the risk of the OTA falling if it was lifted from the finder bracket*

* bracket rather than actual finder

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/01/2021 at 14:28, banjaxed said:

I wouldn't even lift my 8" dob with the side handles.

If that is all that holds the OTA when on the base, can I ask why not?

Edited by Spile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spile said:

No it wasn't - good call.

 I have edited the post accordingly. However I still conclude that the reason that the finder base was deigned with the stop at the top rather than the bottom was to minimise the risk of the OTA falling if it was lifted from the finder bracket*

* bracket rather than actual finder

Thanks for checking . I did wonder if it was someone 'on the internet'  somewhere taking a review or an official statement like 'it is so strong you could lift the telescope by it' and reading it as 'you can lift the telescope by it'  ... or even worse,  you should  !

It's a dangerous place, the internet 🙂 Except here, obv.s 🙂

Heather

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Spile said:

If that is all that holds the OTA when on the base, can I ask why not?

Because to remove the OTA from the base then you have to remove the handles. Also the handles don’t look that strong to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, banjaxed said:

Because to remove the OTA from the base then you have to remove the handles. Also the handles don’t look that strong to me.

I am sorry but I don’t understand you. The handles are designed to support the load of the ota. Therefore they are perfectly capable, and are also ideally located (centre of gravity) for lifting and moving it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Spile said:

I am sorry but I don’t understand you. The handles are designed to support the load of the ota. Therefore they are perfectly capable, and are also ideally located (centre of gravity) for lifting and moving it.

This is the reason I don’t use the handles to lift my OTA 🙁

10AEBDAC-16A3-4525-9EC2-3F1F7823AC5D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, banjaxed said:

This is the reason I don’t use the handles to lift my OTA 🙁

10AEBDAC-16A3-4525-9EC2-3F1F7823AC5D.jpeg

Fair enough and thank you.

Could the damage have been the result of uneven stress placed on a single handle rather than both handles?

Did you report this to Skywatcher and if so what was their response? 

I am pleased with the build quality of the Skywatcher 200P but I think there is a room for improvement when it comes to basic carrying guidance and points where the manual could be clearer. I've checked the FAQ but I cannot find reference to these so I have emailed Opticalvision who are the UK agents for the brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Spile said:

Fair enough and thank you.

Could the damage have been the result of uneven stress placed on a single handle rather than both handles?

Did you report this to Skywatcher and if so what was their response? 

I am pleased with the build quality of the Skywatcher 200P but I think there is a room for improvement when it comes to basic carrying guidance and points where the manual could be clearer. I've checked the FAQ but I cannot find reference to these so I have emailed Opticalvision who are the UK agents for the brand.

I may have been unlucky to have had a faulty handle as I only used it once to move the OTA but since then I bought a pair of Rolson carry handles which fit around the OTA which makes it MUCH more manageable IMO. I never thought of reporting it to Skywatcher as I have never seen it recommended to use the handles to carry the scope, also  it is no longer under warranty.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.