Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

M81 Bodes - 3 months progress


matthasboldlygone

Recommended Posts

I was very happy with my first attempt in September with a Bresser 102 and planetary camera ...

m81-bodes-reproce.thumb.jpg.ed32e7ad9e321062e5bb60ef08976f67.jpg

Some new equipment and practice and it's improving ....

M81-Bodes-2020-12-15-flats-v2.thumb.jpg.2989a15a63cb39ebc217f99ec32bd09b.jpg

42 x 2 minutes

Evostar 100ed + 0.85 reducer
ASI294MC Pro -10, gain 120
HEQ5 Pro
AsiAir - guided

Struggling with Flats but will hopefully solve that soon. They're a pain.

  • Like 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a noticeable step forward, no doubt @matthasboldlygone

Smaller stars and loads more detail.  Nice work 👍

If you're working on it again... when I've stretched M81 I keep an eye on these two stars and try and keep some semblance of separation.  That's not to say I'm successful though... 🙂  I'm not sure what processing tools you're using but you may be able to get some additional colour too - at 1:1 I'm fairly sure I can see some red and blue in there.

image.png.a58c66c949175effa8b37a0fcc4e126b.png

Edited by geeklee
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this because it is an honest product from another amateur. I am distrustful of processed images. I am solidly supportive of the methods and means by which "everyday people" like us explore the extra-terrestrial universe.  I believe that science is for everyone who wants to practice it.  

What would make it perfect would be a write-up explaining the image. I mean, I assume the the stars in the middle of the whirlpool are between us and it. But how do you know? You do say a bit about equipment, instrumentation, calibrations. (42 x 2 minutes Evostar 100ed + 0.85 reducer  ASI294MC Pro -10 gain 120.HEQ5 Pro AsiAir - guided) That is nice for your mates who know what all that means.  Myself, you have a refractor with extra-low dispersion glass, a form of apochromatic correction. You took 42 snapshot in two minutes. You used a "reducer" which is the opposite of a Barlow lens. I have no idea why you would, but I see that you did. Whether your gain of 10 is a lot or a little depends on the range of your rheostat (varistor, volume control). The rest is lost on me.  I only ask because I usually pass over all of the tarted-up airbrushed pinups posted here and on every other discussion board. Your image seemed honest enough. It sent me out to read about M81. I have something new to pursue. So, thanks, again. 

The thing is that I work as a technical writer. You take a picture. I write 1000 words:  https://necessaryfacts.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-andromeda-galaxy.html

Best Regards,

MIke M.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @mikemarotta , I am in two minds about the whole write up side of it. I'm probably not at the stage where I could answer any of those questions reliably. As a technical writer you'll appreciate knowing your subject before passing on knowledge.

I'll have a think about doing a write up of what I did during the night, problems I encountered and how I got to the final image. Could be helpful or just amusing to other beginners. 

👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.