Jump to content

Banner.jpg.39bf5bb2e6bf87794d3e2a4b88f26f1b.jpg

A Perseus field full of astrophysics


robin_astro
 Share

Recommended Posts

A conventional image of this star field in Perseus (~20x15 arcmin) would look rather ordinary but a diffraction grating (100 lines/mm Star Analyser) placed in front of the camera to spread some of the star light into spectra reveals some interesting astrophysics going on in these stars thanks to the power of spectroscopy. (34x10 sec, Celestron CII, ATIK 314L)

perseus_SA100_field_annot.png.1f4cdfb7b2c65dbd097b84ac30d47929.png

 

Top of the frame is W Per,  a Red Supergiant star and like most other supergiants (Betelgeuse for example) is variable in brightness. Here it is currently magnitude 9.5 measured at visual wavelengths (from the AAVSO database), but much brighter in the Infra-Red where most of the light from this star is produced. (The spectrum here extends out to wavelengths beyond 1 micron, the limit of the CCD sensor sensitivity.) We can tell it is a cool star (spectral type M5i) from the sawtooth shape absorption bands in the spectrum produced by spinning and vibrating molecules of Titanium Oxide which are able to form in the relatively cool (~3000K) atmosphere of this star.

Centre is BD+56  727, a hot star (effective temperature ~15000K) of spectral type B5 with no obvious strong absorption lines in the spectrum, typical of very hot stars. The star should look very blue with the spectrum much brighter at the shorter wavelengths but in this case the spectrum is almost even brightness across the visible range due to the large amount of interstellar dust between us and the star which dims and reddens its appearance. (It is V magnitude 10.6 but the dust absorbs over 90% of the visible light so would look much brighter and bluer without the dust).  There is one clear feature in the spectrum though, the bright spot in the red at the Hydrogen alpha wavelength (6563A).  This emission line comes from a rotating disc of gas around the star, the hydrogen atoms being excited by the UV light from the star and glowing in H alpha. (It is a Be star, one of many followed by amateur spectroscopists in support of professional astronomers)

Bottom is WR5 a Wolf Rayet star with a spectacular spectrum showing many emission lines. (It is visual magnitude 10.4 but most of the light is concentrated in the emission lines). Wolf Rayet stars are extremely hot (tens of thousands of degrees K) massive stars nearing the end of their life (probably destined to become supernovae.)  They are shedding their outer layers in powerful high velocity stellar winds. It is the material in these winds (made up of elements formed by nuclear fusion within the star) which produces the emission lines, variously of ionised Helium, Carbon, Nitrogen and Oxygen, excited by the UV radiation from the star.

 

Cheers

Robin

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, andrew s said:

Nice Robin, it could only be bettered with a colour camera! 😏

Regards Andrew 

Funny you should mention that. The idea for this field originally came from Christian Buil when he borrowed my Star Analyser in the early days of it back in 2007 and came back with a version taken with a DSLR. I often use it with permission  in presentations on spectroscopy but finally got round to looking at it myself. Here is Christian's colour version on his website. It does look good in colour but his W Per is rather over exposed. (I did a non linear stretch on my image to avoid that so don't try to measure the flux 😉 )

http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/staranalyser/wr5_2.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Very interesting information, only found out about SA100 few months ago. Wanted to get one of these immediately but have to be patient till the stock arrived in FLO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Similar Content

    • By robin_astro
      This spectrum (taken using the C11 and  ALPY600 spectrograph) is of magnitude 15 star IRAS 00500+6713 in Cassiopeia. It is believed to be the result of a merger between two white dwarfs, kept from complete collapse by a powerful magnetic field and may be the stellar remnant of the supernova seen by Chinese astronomers in 1181.  It is a star of extremes with a temperature of 200,000 K and 16,000 km/s winds. More about this star and references on my BAA page here
      https://britastro.org/observations/observation.php?id=20210930_153458_144e8bbb0f30f495
      Cheers
      Robin

    • By MonteTheMagnificent
      Hello all,
       
      I am looking into making a hobby out of spectroscopy but don't exactly know where to start.
      All I can really go off is a high school education of physics and the various reading that one usually does when looking into something new.
      The main questions are, essentially;
      1. What is the best spectrometry equipment for an amateur like myself?
      I have little to no knowledge on all the necessary equipment, so any recommendations would be very much appreciated. For any suggestions, if you wouldn't mind giving a reason as to why you recommend a said product, I will take this information with great appreciation.
      In terms of a camera, I've read that CCD monochrome cameras are the best. How does a DSLR rank against this though?
      In terms of a telescope, should I be looking at one with a specific aperture range? If so, are there any other properties I should be looking at?
      Is a grating better than a prism? Why?
      What software is the most effective and easiest to use?
      Do I need some sort of focusing device?
      2. How do you collect spectral data using the technology?
      Is it as simple as pointing at a star and recording the acquired data?
      How long should I view the chosen star? Is it a photo or a video?
       
      I would assume that these questions have been asked plenty of times, so any links to other forums which discuss the same questions and topics I am raising will be very helpful as well.
      Any type of reply is welcome. As an amateur, anything is helpful.
       
      Looking forward to discussing this with you all.
       
      Monte.
       
       
       
    • By ejp1684
      I've called it LOWSPEC.2 as it's the updated version of Paul Gerlach's LOWSPEC, a DIY 3D printed spectrograph. I built the first version but had trouble aligning the guide mirror (which was fixed), and locating the slit by waving a torch down the scope made it difficult to use.
      The updated version is a vast improvement, for me at any rate.
      1. The guide mirror can now be adjusted forward and backwards and side to side. I can now actually guide the spectrograph.
      2. Adding an Illumination device (Baader). The slit can now be illuminated and the overlay in PHP2 used to locate it. No more trouble getting the star on the slit.
      There is also the option to use a 30mm dia camera lens instead of 24mm. The camera lens used is 100mm focal length; I had a 30mm dia lens left over from a previous diy project which is 90mm focal length so I used that. I'm not sure of its quality as I bought it for £15 from ebay, but it seems to work ok.
      I also had a defraction grating of 600 l/mm from a previous project so used that. Paul reckons LOWSPEC will now cope with anything up to a grating of 1800 l/mm.
      For calibration I used a Philips S10 starter bulb because I found some calibration charts for it, (I think on one of the French websites) and these bulbs are about £1 in B & Q, significantly less than the Relco ones (if you can get them). I made a hole in the top cover, made a container on the 3D printer and now I simply insert it when I need to get a calibration reading. Not the most practical solution but again, it seems to work. If Paul manages to add a calibration unit inside LOWSPEC, that would be the icing on the cake. And if it could just be attached to the existing body that would be a bonus, as it took me 29 hours to print!
      Here's a couple of shots of the thing itself.

      The long tube houses the Philips lamp.

      Here the calibration unit is inserted into the top cover.
      The first reasonably clear night was moonlit and there was high cloud coming and going, but I went first for Vega as it's easy to image and calibrate with the Hydrogen lines.

      The salmon coloured line is the A0V reference.
      The image of Vega looked quite good on the laptop, so I moved on to P Cygni, one of my favourite subjects, and here are the results.




      I've taken some of the readings from a PDF version of Richard Walker's 'Spectroscopic Atlas for Amateur Astronomers'. It doesn't seem to be available for download any more, I think there's now a book which you have to buy.
      I may need to get a better guide camera; I'm using an Altair Astro GPCAM mono and when guiding it used a star with a S/N ration of 9.8, the brightest available. But having said that, it managed to keep P Cygni on the slit for 5 minutes at a time.
      LOWSPEC is a great project if you've started out using the StarAnalyser and want to move to a higher resolution. It takes a lot of patience and persistence, but worth it. I reckon the total cost for LOWSPEC is about a quarter of the cost of an equivalent 'off the shelf' spectroscope, so if you can't justify spending loads of dosh then this is a viable option.
      Eric.
    • By kecsap
      Hi,
      I completed a small 3D printing project yesterday to have a cap for my Star Analyser 100 filter while it is permanently fit on DSLR lenses. Here it is the 3D model if anybody else wants to print such cap for a filter:
      https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2834248
      Csaba
    • By Ganymede12
      I know that astrophotographers can use diffraction gratings and filters to image a star's spectra. However, is there a filter or eyepiece that a visual observer can use to see a star's spectra? Like, look through an eyepiece and instead of seeing points of light you see each star's spectra? Or am I going stir crazy from a lack of observing ? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.