102 Mak as addition to 130p newton

[happy-kat]

It won't be same as Mak 102 as the heritage is f5

[Vulisha]

Polaris is on a vacation 😛

Well as I understand from posts before, with barlow to match F, and perfect dead centre collimation, 130 should be even better than 102 mak. 

[happy-kat]

this is what mine looked like when I took this image several years ago

not perfect but good enough to see a Jupiter moon shadow transit

heritage 130p

https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/254675-f5-collimation-patterns/?do=findComment&comment=2778203

another good link and link to guide written on here

https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/283718-is-it-even-possible-to-collimate-an-f4-newtonian-telescope/?do=findComment&comment=3106839

Edited October 7, 2020 by happy-kat
removed the unnecessary

[Vulisha]

Well I would say this is not bad result at all 

So Heritage 130p,  3x barlow, eos M, best 2% out of 15000 frames 

pipp, registax, ps cs2, cropped and enlarged a bit

 

I did a lot of collimation and adjusting to achieve this as mentioned in thread before and I think this is maximum I can get with the current equipment regarding raw data, probably could do more with better processing. 

Edited October 20, 2020 by Vulisha