Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg

Recommended Posts

Baader optical wonder solution is practically Isopropyl alcohol. Instead of £12 for a 70mL of it, buy a 1000 mL of Isopropyl alcohol for £22 (before pandemic it was only £5). They have also smaller bottles which will be cheaper of course. The Baader solution and Isopropyl alcohol don’t remove the toughest of fungi on optics, only a few of the less deep set ones can be treated with them. I have used both for cleaning eyepieces and on certain stage of cleaning several 8 to 12 inch mirrors. They both worked identical. When applied through an optical cleaning fabric, they remove ( dissolve) fatty oils and fingerprints on optical surfaces. I had cleaned a 12 inch mirror once which for some unknown reason had ice cream stain on it (cleaning followed standard operation procedure for cleaning coated aluminised mirrors).

Edited by Dippy
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi all, Just though I would post my experience with the Baader product today. I purchased the set and an air blower/pump for the grand sum of £22 with post. My 14mm Morpheus had accumulated

Actually, isopropanol and isopropyl alcohol are 2-propanol. Wonder liquid has 1-propanol, which is more volatile, but really, it is just another solvent. I once was stupid enough to buy a bottle

From my perspective I have very little knowledge about what goes into these things, and do not feel motivated to spend time finding out. As others have said, Baader have put something together that wo

Posted Images

Isopropyl or isopropanol alcohol is also known as 'rubbing alcohol'. I am very... and would be very cautious... when using it on a glass or mirrored coated surface for optical use. I have used it and occasionally seen a few streaks where it has evaporated before wiping with a surgical/medical grade cotton wool, lens cloth or lens tissue, when removing stubborn stains. I have found when using that the Baader Optical Wonder fluid, a little goes along way, and I finish off with it, if I started my clean with isopropyl/isopropanol alcohol.

Just don't apply to much pressure to the 'pad' when cleaning the optical surfaces, etc., with whatever liquid solution you use.
Interesting to know how the ice-cream🍦stain got there in the first place... :icescream: unless like me... you eat it 24/7...365.25 days of the year! 😋

Edited by Philip R
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, johninderby said:

+1 for the Baader Optical Wonder fluid. It simply works and I know it isn’t gping to harm the lens or objective that needs cleaning.

 

+2 for it. I've had a bottle and the micro fibre cloth for ages and they are still doing a great job.

Not an area that I'm interested in economizing in.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dippy said:

Baader optical wonder solution is practically Isopropyl alcohol. Instead of £12 for a 70mL of it, buy a 1000 mL of Isopropyl alcohol for £22 (before pandemic it was only £5). They have also smaller bottles which will be cheaper of course. The Baader solution and Isopropyl alcohol don’t remove the toughest of fungi on optics, only a few of the less deep set ones can be treated with them. I have used both for cleaning eyepieces and on certain stage of cleaning several 8 to 12 inch mirrors. They both worked identical. When applied through an optical cleaning fabric, they remove ( dissolve) fatty oils and fingerprints of n optical surfaces. I had cleaned a 12 inch mirror once which for some unknown reason had ice cream stain on it (cleaning followed standard operation procedure for cleaning coated aluminised mirrors).

 

If you wish to opt for cheap and cheerful solutions, then that is entirety up to you. But when there are many people on this site with very expensive refractor scopes worth thousands ,then I do not think spending £12 to use a specially designed high quality fluid  to clean your refractor lens or eyepiece correctly is false economy. And a bottle lasts a considerable time. 👍  for Baader optical fluid 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Baader's optical wonder is a solution of 1-propanol and alcohol. Nothing special really. Fantastic marketing though.

Isopropy alcohol is 2-propanol.

Propanol and alcohol are the magic ingredients that protect against fungus in Baader's wonder liquid. They kill spores.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ruud said:

Baader's optical wonder is a solution of 1-propanol and alcohol. Nothing special really. Fantastic marketing though.

Isopropy alcohol is 2-propanol.

Propanol and alcohol are the magic ingredients that protect against fungus in Baader's wonder liquid. They kill spores.

Indeed, the Baader material safety data sheet says it contains 25% ethanol and 35% isopropanol. I presume the 40% rest is water. No mention of anything else like surfactants.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, isopropanol and isopropyl alcohol are 2-propanol. Wonder liquid has 1-propanol, which is more volatile, but really, it is just another solvent.

I once was stupid enough to buy a bottle of Baader's liquid. I was interested in its secret magic ingredients and looked up the data sheet that Jeremy links to. So I found out it's just ethanol and 1-propanol in water. Every active substance must be in the sheet (hospitals use the sheets for toxicology information, manufactures must make this information available).

So Baarder's miracle is that they sell two simple organic solvents in water for over €100 per litre.

The bottle is nice though. But the other day I bought an after-bite spray for mosquito bites. This came in a bottle that makes just as fine a spray as Baader's bottle. It cost €1 complete with after-bite liquid.

So what I did is pour out the after-bite liquid (into a different bottle). I rinsed the bottle and cleaned the nozzle with water several times, then I did the same once with alcohol and refilled the new bottle with 96% alcohol.

Total cost for the spray bottle and 96% alcohol: €2.25.

It's a nice spray bottle with a cap. It won't leak. In it is a fantastic cleaning solution. I can recommend it: It contains a potent  ingredient that protects against fungus.

  • Like 4
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Ruud said:

Actually, isopropanol and isopropyl alcohol are 2-propanol. Wonder liquid has 1-propanol,

Very true: I glanced at the MSDS too quickly.

26 minutes ago, Ruud said:

t's a nice spray bottle with a cap. It won't leak. In it is a fantastic cleaning solution. I can recommend it: It contains a potent  ingredient that protects against fungus.

Can I be your UK sales agent? 🤣

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Ruud said:

I once was stupid enough to buy a bottle of Baader's liquid....

 

That's pretty rude isn't it ? :sad:

Deliberately posting that in a thread where you know that others have made the choice of the Baader product ?

By all means make difference choices and explain your reasoning but have some respect for other fellow members choices here, as per the forum Code of Conduct. Implying that others are "stupid" is not in keeping with that.

Thanks.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09/09/2020 at 18:54, Dippy said:

Baader optical wonder solution is practically Isopropyl alcohol. Instead of £12 for a 70mL of it, buy a 1000 mL of Isopropyl alcohol for £22 (before pandemic it was only £5). They have also smaller bottles which will be cheaper of course. The Baader solution and Isopropyl alcohol don’t remove the toughest of fungi on optics, only a few of the less deep set ones can be treated with them. I have used both for cleaning eyepieces and on certain stage of cleaning several 8 to 12 inch mirrors. They both worked identical. When applied through an optical cleaning fabric, they remove ( dissolve) fatty oils and fingerprints of n optical surfaces. I had cleaned a 12 inch mirror once which for some unknown reason had ice cream stain on it (cleaning followed standard operation procedure for cleaning coated aluminised mirrors).

One of the main differences is probably the degree of purity, solvents from cheap sources will probably contain significant levels of impurities which will leave deposits behind on optical surfaces.

I remember back to the days when I used to work in laboratory, 'Analar' (high purity) grade chemicals cost several times as much as the normal grade.

John 

Edited by johnturley
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have anything that really needs cleaning, but I must admit to an inbuilt resistance to waste cash on over-priced supremely marketted materials that can be purchased for a fraction of the price by buying generic equivalents (lots of medications come under that hat).  Thus, I would not buy the Baader Wonder fluid on principle as I believe that generic diluted in purified water, isopropyl alcohol would probably serve in exactly the same manner.  

However, just a point about the content of SDS sheets.  An SDS sheet is only OBLIGATED to list any chemical ingredients in a product which are themselves classed as 'hazardous' under EU definitions.  Thus, although it is probably the case that the missing %age content on the Baader wonder fluid IS pure water (that's what I tend to imagine it is myself), it doens't HAVE to be water - it could be any other ingredient not in itself deamed 'hazardous', so it might be an inert non-haz. natural additive, or something like sodium thiosulphate.  So just because there is missing percentage on an SDS sheet it need not be just water.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't we already discuss this in the thread about lens fungus? 

I will say what I said in that thread, in my experience pure Isopropyl is far too volatile resulting in it evaporating before it is able to break down a range of contaminants that you might find on an optical surface.  The Baader fluid is less volatile and I find that it gives you more time to work the surface and hence lift contaminants off the surface onto the cotton pad. 

Sure its more expensive but i see it as you are paying for a little research baader have performed to optimise the mix. Yes one ingredient will be pure water as it helps slow evaporation for example, but I don't feel cheated by that at all.  I have better thing to do with my time than trying save a few pounds by mixing my own cleaning fluid. 

Adam 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Basicly the Baader fluid works and a bottle lasts for years so just not worth my time to make my own and not knowing all that goes into it just the potentialy “dangerous” ingredients further complicates. it.

Edited by johninderby
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, John said:
56 minutes ago, Ruud said:

I once was stupid enough to buy a bottle of Baader's liquid....

 

That's pretty rude isn't it ? :sad:

Deliberately posting that in a thread where you know that others have made the choice of the Baader product ?

By all means make difference choices and explain your reasoning but have some respect for other fellow members choices here, as per the forum Code of Conduct. Implying that others are "stupid" is not in keeping with that.

Thanks.

@John, I fell for Baader's suggestive advertising and feel stupid for it. Generally I am not stupid and I certainly do not thinks members here are stupid.

I mentioned the liquid before:

and:

and possibly elsewhere too.

So Baader's wonder is an overpriced product that does what it promises. At the same time I feel people should be warned against Baader's suggestive selling point that it contains two anti-fungal ingredients. Any alcohol kills spores.  Baader's wonder is just a mixture of two watered down alcohols: ethanol and propanol. 

I fell for it and wasted some money. I want to help others against doing the same. Like me, they may feel that they are buying a product with special additives that protect against and prevent lens fungus. They aren't.

They are just buying two watered down alcohols for a ridiculous price.

Is it so strange that I felt stupid for doing that?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ruud said:

@John, I fell for Baader's suggestive advertising and feel stupid for it. Generally I am not stupid and I certainly do not thinks members here are stupid.

I mentioned the liquid before:

and:

and possibly elsewhere too.

So Baader's wonder is an overpriced product that does what it promises. At the same time I feel people should be warned against Baader's suggestive selling point that it contains two anti-fungal ingredients. Any alcohol kills spores.  Baader's wonder is just a mixture of two watered down alcohols: ethanol and propanol. 

I fell for it and wasted some money. I want to help others against doing the same. Like me, they may feel that they are buying a product with special additives that protect against and prevent lens fungus. They aren't.

They are just buying two watered down alcohols for a ridiculous price.

Is it so strange that I felt stupid for doing that?

 

Just don't imply that other peoples choices are stupid - OK ?

It's not much to ask is it ?

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

From my perspective I have very little knowledge about what goes into these things, and do not feel motivated to spend time finding out. As others have said, Baader have put something together that works very well and I don’t feel ripped off paying for their efforts.

If you know what you are doing and can source and mix pure components to make the same thing, all power to your elbow. Trouble is a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and others who know less than you may source the wrong things and run into problems.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

100ml of any cleaning fluid really should last years. I don't see how the cost of the wonder stuff is really going to break anyone. I have a large bottle of isopropanol that is older than all of my lenses and eye pieces 😀

Edited by Stardaze
Link to post
Share on other sites

Deionised water IS different from distilled, but I cannot imagine either damaging optical equipment.  DI water is often used for steam irons and topping up lead acid batteries and I imagine would be useful on optical equip. or for mixing with IPA https://www.amazon.co.uk/CarPlan-DIW250-De-Ionised-Water/dp/B00FRIH094/ref=sr_1_5?adgrpid=54722411738&dchild=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI19Ounpjf6wIVTOd3Ch2w_wUaEAAYASAAEgJk0vD_BwE&hvadid=259088749393&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=9045038&hvnetw=g&hvqmt=e&hvrand=9815806837557291122&hvtargid=kwd-306094015612&hydadcr=28150_1724812&keywords=water+for+irons&qid=1599761568&sr=8-5&tag=googhydr-21

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I've never bought the Baader fluid, I use a regular lens cleaning fluid for glasses and it works just fine. Have gone through it quite quickly tho so will need to order some in a few months. Then again I used it on my glasses and have overhauled a fair few pairs of binoculars over the past couple years. I tend to use Zeiss wipes now for my glasses (easier to carry a few in the work bag) or other optics that aren't too in need of a deeper treatment.

Edited by DaveL59
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JemC
      Having a little clear out and slight change around so i have a few items that are surplus to requirements if anyone is interested,
      ALL payments to be made via:
      1st option - Bank Transfer
      2nd option - PayPal +3% to cover fees
      3rd option - cash on collection if reasonably local
       
      #1
      Telrad Finder
      £25.00 with postage ( UK only )
      ....................................................................
      #2
      Sky-Watcher 28mm LET 2" eyepiece
      £15.00
      ........................................................................
      #3
      Sky-Watcher EQ6 Extension Tube for NEQ6 
      In a well used condition, purely cosmetic, could do with a good clean and re-paint but fully functional.
      £30.00
      ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
      #4
      Pistol grip ball head, no longer required.
      This came off a Ravelli APGL4 tripod,
      £25.00
      ...............................................................................
      #1




      #2




      #3




      #4


      thanks for looking.
    • By imtl
      I have a Televue Ethos 10mm and 6mm for sale. 450GBP each. 
      In pristine condition with boxes and end caps.
      Cheers





    • By imtl
      I have an immaculate Panoptic 41mm with the original box and with end caps. It is in pristine condition. 375GBP. The retails is 500GBP.
      ** I also have a TV Ethos 10mm and 6mm for sale. Let me know if you are interested.
      Cheers
       
       
       
       


    • By Astrofriend
      I bought two new dew heaters. They are sold to be used on camera lenses and powered from USB. I have modified them to reduce the power from 8 Watt to 2 Watt which will be enough for my demand.
      Some photos and documentation from this project:
      http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/projects/project-heating-band/05-project-heating-band.html
      This will be battery operated and I try to reduce the power consumtion of the equipment.
      /Lars
    • By Bajastro
      More than a year has passed since the construction of the Low Spec spectrograph in version 2.0 provided by the author of the project (@Paul Gerlach).
      The project provided for the purchase of a ready-made module for illumination of the slit.
      From the beginning, I missed a decent calibration module and slit illumination.
      But why buy something for almost PLN 100, when you can illuminate the slit while building a spectrum calibration module and add additional functionality.
      Everything is great on the "project":

      Inside the device:

      But the electrical diagram I drew was not correct (I don't know anything about it at the time).
      Not everything worked, so the modifications during soldering and compromises started: D, after a few attempts with soldering and desoldering, my calibration module finally works as it should.
      It was important for me that the calibration standard should be stationary (not moving), and this of the available components on the market only provides an imaging flip mirror with a tilting mirror. 
      It is sold under various brands with T2 threads, so it has a lot of possibilities for mounting various accessories and I made the right module for it. 
      No store in Poland undertook to order it, so I had to buy it on my own (UK).
      RELCO 480 starter spectral lamp:

      The cylindrical mirror is a piece of aluminum foil stuck to it for packing sandwiches
      Slit illumination also works:

      Finally, only one LED informing that the slit illumination is on (the RELCO lamp with the diode on doesn't work).
      Now it's time to put together the set:

      Low Spec with 2 cameras and a calibration module is very big and heavy:

      Solar line tests in diffused light on clouds:


      RELCO 480 spectral lines have two values, the upper one is measured by calibrating the spectrum with solar lines, and the lower value is taken from
      Richard Walker, CH-Rifferswil, 2017, Glow Starter RELCO SC480 Atlas of Emission Lines, available online: https://www.ursusmajor.ch/downloads/sques-relco-sc480-calibration-lines-5.0.pdf
      The difference between my measurements and the data from the Echelle spectrograph from the above atlas is basically negligible, everywhere smaller than 0.2 Å, which means that on my scale it is below 1 pixel.
      It seems that the construction of the calibration module was successful.
      The calibration module will facilitate a sufficiently accurate calibration of the spectra of faint stars without clear metal spectral lines and in regions where there are no atmospheric oxygen and water absorption lines used for accurate spectral calibration.
      I had to capture pictures quickly because I have a drift on the diffraction grating holder (the spectra move over time).
      Rather, it is loose, there is a micrometer screw and a spring, so the holder isn't very stable.
      I would to improve it next.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.