Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep24_banner.thumb.jpg.56e65b9c9549c15ed3f06e146fc5f5f1.jpg

Steenamaroo

Is there more to be had? (moon - sharpness - 200p - 500d)

Recommended Posts

Hi all,
I've been dabbling for about a year and am having a lot of fun.
Nothing too serious and I don't have mega expectations but I'm starting to wonder if my images could be sharper and there's something I'm missing.

 

I'm attaching a picture which is the best 10% of a 3 minute video with 500d 'bolted' straight to the 200p f5 scope. No filters...no barlows...just camera straight on.

It's sharpened and saturated after the fact so in every way this is the sharpest I can get it.

I've always had the same issue whether it's with a single shot, stacks of shots, or stacked video.
Views through the eyepieces (circle-T 12.5/25) are mega sharp!

 

I'm happy that collimation is very good and it was a remarkably clear night tonight.
All in all I'd be pretty happy with this image (maybe over exposed a bit...) if the craters with shadows didn't make me want to rub my eyes.

 

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or advice!

Moon10%2.png

Edited by Steenamaroo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you considered trying some smartphone photography?

Single smartphone shot with my 80mm APO and a Baader Neodymium filter.

22C93B2D-BCFB-4D86-A34B-AB0853500C29.png

Edited by johninderby
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could give it a go, sure, but why would that be sharper than a 500d?
It clearly is, but I don't understand why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, johninderby said:

Have you considered trying some smartphone photography?

Single smartphone shot with my 80mm APO.

22C93B2D-BCFB-4D86-A34B-AB0853500C29.png

I agree with John.

I'm no imager at all but I've been happily surprised what even my basic android phone can do held over the eyepiece. I've bought a very cheap phone holder which makes this a little easier. Here are a few of my mobile phone shots which are nothing special compared to what the specialist imagers can produce but they made me happy :smiley:

 

rupesrecta.jpg

luneclipse160719.jpg

venus200520.jpg

merctrans111119.jpg

sol180419detail.jpg

20190513_204722.jpg

20190609_215717.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smartphone cameras can be surprisingly good for simple AP. 👍🏻

I’ve been experimenting with an inexpensive microscope camera that shows promise although have just gotten the proper adaptor so should be able to get better images.

C657F738-A9C7-40BC-9E44-935C811B6EE0.png

Edited by johninderby
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that DSLRs can suffer from shutter slap causing vibrations and soft images. I've always found that I got better lunar images using a phone taking pics through the eyepice than using DSLR attached directly to scope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For sharpest images with DSLR you are better off taking single frames rather than video: I note that 500D has  a 15MP sensor and records up to full HD 1080p which is only 2MP. This means that the video is resampled and of much lower resolution than the camera is capable of. Additionally the codec applies compression to the video (probably IPB, interframe compression) which is very lossy. So using the video frames you don't get the full benefit of the sensor.

You can try taking 100 single shots in raw format  and stacking them to see if there is an improvement.

 

Nikolay

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With a DSLR taking images of the Moon, the exposure times that are usable generally give you problems from shutter shake and mirror slap. With my Nikon D750, I lock the mirror up and use a remote wire-less release to minimise this. Also, using a very heavy mount instead of a photo tripod will reduce vibration if you use a small scope. For example, using an ED80 (the original full resolution image is very sharp).. Don't forget, if you use a phone at the eyepiece, you are adding two extra optical components (eyepiece and phone camera lens) which can introduce distortion.

Chris

 

moonsmall.jpg

Edited by chiltonstar
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the suggestions, folks

I am using a good heavy mount with decent tracking and remote shutter so that's a few things ruled out, at least.
I appreciate the resolution for video is going to be much lower than for an image but figured I should definitely at least try a decent video, stacked, for comparison, before asking for advice.

 

I'll take some time to compare multiple DSLR raws, picking the best, with iphone/eyepiece shots and see what I can come up with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By SovietShibe
      Hey there! So if you have a telescope as mentioned in the title, you probably noticed that the focus wheel stops working after a bit.
      Well If you look under the focuser you can see a small metal piece with 4 screws on it. You need a Philips head screwdriver to unscrew these, WARNING there's a lot of superglue(which actually isn't needed at all) so wear gloves!after you've unscrewed
      the metal piece a small black 2 ended piece should fall out. If it didn't fall, take it out. Now place your focusing wheels back without that small piece that fell out and screw everything back in.
      The remaining black piece that fell out should probably be thrown away.
      Now just don't focus out to the max and everything should work just fine!
      I hope this helped(btw I'm new here so i might've butchered the terminology) *just let me know
    • By Dave Baxter
      Moon shot directly from my Celestron 8SE, April 6, 2020. ISO 200, 1/320 exposure with my Canon Rebel SL2.
    • By vegaandarctures
      Hi all. 
      I've been pondering over the idea of upgrading the standard focuser on my 200p to a dual speed one. This one: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/skywatcher-focusers/dual-speed-crayford-1252-inch-focuser-for-skywatcher-explorer.html 
      This is primarily due to my frustration when observing the planets, especially when the seeing isn't great. I really need that extra tiny bit of precise focus, and the focuser I currently have just moves that notch too much when I try and fine tune. Do you guys think it's worth going for one of these? Also how easy is it to attach a new focuser? I don't want to go recking my scope by dropping screws onto the mirror 😅
      Many thanks,
      Thomas 
    • By Karan05
      Hi i own Celestron 130EQ which comes with 20mm erect EP and 10mm EP.... i bought a GSO ED 3x Barlow... The focus is not very sharp while using Barlow... Is it the EP at fault ???? Is it worth upgrading to Kelner or a Plossl ???? 
    • By StarGazingSiouxsie
      Hi,
      I bought some Williams Optics Binoviewers. They appear very nice quality but I cannot achieve foucus with them on a 5" Celestron Newtonian, FL = 650MM fr = f5. 
      I have not used binoviwers before today and I bought them primarily for my new telescope which hasn't arrived yet, a Celestron 9.25 CST. 

      I wanted to try the binoviwers out on the 5" today but could not achieve focus. I also tried using the 1.5 x Barlow that came with them.
      Is there a reason they won't focus? Do you think they will be OK on my bigger scope?
      Thanks. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.