Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Steenamaroo

Is there more to be had? (moon - sharpness - 200p - 500d)

Recommended Posts

Hi all,
I've been dabbling for about a year and am having a lot of fun.
Nothing too serious and I don't have mega expectations but I'm starting to wonder if my images could be sharper and there's something I'm missing.

 

I'm attaching a picture which is the best 10% of a 3 minute video with 500d 'bolted' straight to the 200p f5 scope. No filters...no barlows...just camera straight on.

It's sharpened and saturated after the fact so in every way this is the sharpest I can get it.

I've always had the same issue whether it's with a single shot, stacks of shots, or stacked video.
Views through the eyepieces (circle-T 12.5/25) are mega sharp!

 

I'm happy that collimation is very good and it was a remarkably clear night tonight.
All in all I'd be pretty happy with this image (maybe over exposed a bit...) if the craters with shadows didn't make me want to rub my eyes.

 

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or advice!

Moon10%2.png

Edited by Steenamaroo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you considered trying some smartphone photography?

Single smartphone shot with my 80mm APO and a Baader Neodymium filter.

22C93B2D-BCFB-4D86-A34B-AB0853500C29.png

Edited by johninderby
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could give it a go, sure, but why would that be sharper than a 500d?
It clearly is, but I don't understand why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, johninderby said:

Have you considered trying some smartphone photography?

Single smartphone shot with my 80mm APO.

22C93B2D-BCFB-4D86-A34B-AB0853500C29.png

I agree with John.

I'm no imager at all but I've been happily surprised what even my basic android phone can do held over the eyepiece. I've bought a very cheap phone holder which makes this a little easier. Here are a few of my mobile phone shots which are nothing special compared to what the specialist imagers can produce but they made me happy :smiley:

 

rupesrecta.jpg

luneclipse160719.jpg

venus200520.jpg

merctrans111119.jpg

sol180419detail.jpg

20190513_204722.jpg

20190609_215717.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smartphone cameras can be surprisingly good for simple AP. 👍🏻

I’ve been experimenting with an inexpensive microscope camera that shows promise although have just gotten the proper adaptor so should be able to get better images.

C657F738-A9C7-40BC-9E44-935C811B6EE0.png

Edited by johninderby
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that DSLRs can suffer from shutter slap causing vibrations and soft images. I've always found that I got better lunar images using a phone taking pics through the eyepice than using DSLR attached directly to scope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For sharpest images with DSLR you are better off taking single frames rather than video: I note that 500D has  a 15MP sensor and records up to full HD 1080p which is only 2MP. This means that the video is resampled and of much lower resolution than the camera is capable of. Additionally the codec applies compression to the video (probably IPB, interframe compression) which is very lossy. So using the video frames you don't get the full benefit of the sensor.

You can try taking 100 single shots in raw format  and stacking them to see if there is an improvement.

 

Nikolay

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With a DSLR taking images of the Moon, the exposure times that are usable generally give you problems from shutter shake and mirror slap. With my Nikon D750, I lock the mirror up and use a remote wire-less release to minimise this. Also, using a very heavy mount instead of a photo tripod will reduce vibration if you use a small scope. For example, using an ED80 (the original full resolution image is very sharp).. Don't forget, if you use a phone at the eyepiece, you are adding two extra optical components (eyepiece and phone camera lens) which can introduce distortion.

Chris

 

moonsmall.jpg

Edited by chiltonstar
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the suggestions, folks

I am using a good heavy mount with decent tracking and remote shutter so that's a few things ruled out, at least.
I appreciate the resolution for video is going to be much lower than for an image but figured I should definitely at least try a decent video, stacked, for comparison, before asking for advice.

 

I'll take some time to compare multiple DSLR raws, picking the best, with iphone/eyepiece shots and see what I can come up with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Planetarian
      Hi, I've got a Skywatcher Heritage 130p reflector, and if i insert anything less than 10mm eyepiece, the image won't get crisp. I guess it's normal, but as I'm very new to astronomy, I'd like to know what the sharpness depends on exactly. 
      Is that the focal length (how fast the telescope is? ) or the size of the mirror and how much light it gathers? Or both affect it the same way?  
      Are things the same with refractors in this regard? Thanks. 
    • By Kimboman
      Hi I went out this early evening to see if Saturn and Jupiter were observable but the clouds dominated this area.
      The Moon however was in a very clear area so I used my MeadeETX90 with a bino viewer with two 25mm eyepieces and spent some time viewing it.
      The views were really good as the Moon was in the first quarter which is when I feel is one of the best times to view it as it is not to bright.
      The shadows that were being cast were amazing but once again the clouds rolled in so until the next time??
    • By theonlypromg
      The Great Conjunction
      who else waiting for the Great Conjunction between Saturn and Jupiter in 21 December 2020
      Click here to watch
       
       
       
    • By AstroRookie
      Hello,
      I'm getting desperate over this hobby (but I refuse to give up); with every change new problems set in. I purchased a SVBONY SV106 (60mm - 240mm) guide scope to replace a 80mm - 400mm scope, I was using as a guide scope which was installed on the Orion 8 tube rings. I replaced the finder scope with the guide scope.
      First issue balancing but that one I sorted out. Then I tried to focus the ASI120MM with the new guide scope. For the old  one (80x400) , I needed 2 extensions (in fact the extensions are low cost barlows from which I removed the plastic lens) to get focus. To align the new guide scope, I used a 17mm eyepiece and that went ok while pointing at some far away trees. But I could not get the ASI120MM focused on the same trees, not with PHD2 nor with Firecapture; I turned the gain way down, but with or without extensions, no focus. As bad weather is (again) setting in and the scope is permanently outside I had to stop trying.
      So I take on this break to get some assistance.  Anybody any advice on this, for
      AstroRookie
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.