Jump to content

stargazine_ep34_banner.thumb.jpg.28dd32d9305c7de9b6591e6bf6600b27.jpg

Atik383l+ First Light - Quick NAN in Ha with a vintage 135mm lens


Recommended Posts

A few months back, i bought my first mono camera, an Atik 383l+ from Martin @Xsubmariner off here. I hadn't had a chance to give it a whirl until last night. 

I thought about getting the 80ED out, but i've been wanting to do some widefield stuff for a while, so i attached an old Tamron 135mm F2.8 vintage M42 lens i picked up last year for next to nothing. The lens needs to be stopped down to F5.6 (perhaps less, i haven't tested though) to produce acceptable stars in broadband, but i was hoping it could be used more wide open for Narrowband. I used step-down rings screwed on to the end of the lens hood to bring the aperture down to 37mm, which is about F3.65 (i did briefly try it wide open in Ha, and it wasn't that bad tbh, but i could still make out some comet-shaped stars in a few places so i opted to stop it down a bit to play it safe). I have a TS Optics filter drawer in the optical train, so i can still swap out filters without too much fuss. I still have about 3-4mm of extra backfocus space to spare, but i can already find focus as it is, so i'm not sure if it's that important that i haven't fully used it all up.

Focusing was tough. I was focusing using a Bahtinov mask on Deneb, and i had to use 10s subs (subframes) at 2x2 bin to get bright enough spikes for Bahtinov Grabber to pick up to the spikes ok. Even then, it was showing the focus error moving about quite a bit, even without me touching the focus ring. In the end i just got it as close as i could and went with it.

Conditions were not great. Some clear spells, but there was a lot of cloud passing through. I figures it would be good enough for a test session. The Phd guide graph looked horrific, and was somewhere in the 1-2" range (image scale is 8.4" so not a big deal hopefully). I bodged together a couple of old dovetails to add enough weight to counter-balance the 5Kg counterweight. It just about does. It's not perfect by any means, but hopefully sufficient for this purpose. 

I would ideally like to shoot 1200s subs, but couldn't last night due to the constant clouds (Phd lost the guide star countless times). I was about to give up, but persisted and aimed for 600s subs. Glad i did, as i ended up with 6 useable subs, even if a couple were affected by some thin cloud. 

Did a quick stack in APP and a 10 min process in PS, just to get a rough idea of what i can expect from this. I used Flats and a couple of Darks just to do a rough calibration. Didn't do any gradient reduction, was in too much of a hurry after packing up last night. Overall i'm fairly pleased with how it performed. I'm obviously not aiming for Samyang 135mm F2 levels of performance here, but for purely NB bi-colour mosaics i think it can do a job. 

I've included a picture of the rig below as well, in case anyone's interested.

CS.

6 x 600s (1 Hr)

Atik 383l+  2" Baader Ha 7nm

Tamron Adaptall2 135mm F2.8 (@F3.65)

NAN_60mins_QuickCalibration-St-denoise-Quick-Process.thumb.jpg.60be12c666b43b2b8ebba5d964f0bd20.jpg

20200815_125718.thumb.jpg.0f16d7ed978686541fe4a6ebdd90e23f.jpg

Edited by Xiga
  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

You're a true artist mate. Every single image of yours is full of clarity and detail. I still ca not understand how you manage 20min exposures on this mount. I know balance is of utmost importance but still. Hats off to you mate. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking good Ciarán and nice to see another KAF8300 getting used for widefield imaging. The 135mm gives a fair bit more FOV than the comparable shot I took with the 180mm lens. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice image and setup - Sh2-119 on the left gives a nice balance to the North American and Pelican.

I've also found vintage (and budget) M42 prime lenses work pretty well for wide-angle narrowband and give a lot of versatility to an existing telescopic setup.

My theory was that with only one wavelength to contend with in narrowband, there's no need to have expensive glass to counter chromatic aberration.

A few notes which might help in case anyone else tries this type of setup:

+Focussing - With patience, I found I could get good enough focus by hand (I measured FWHM in short test subs and adjusted the lens barrel).
+Guiding - Much easier than normal when imaging at 10''/px (works fine even if windy!)
+Drizzle - Since you'll almost certainly be oversampling compared to seeing, drizzle works well if you have lots of subs
+Aperture - With a Ha filter, wide open on a Carl Zeiss 135mm f/3.5 was pretty much the same as stopped down to f/4 and higher, same thing on a Asahi Pentax Takumar 200mm f/4.
+Mount attachment / Differential Flexure - Since the Atik314L+ doesn't have a screw mount on the bottom of the camera, I used a lens collar ring around the lens (see picture below). Even with a tight fit and extra felt tape around the lens barrel I sometimes got a bit of differential flexure (you can compensate for this to some extent using PHD2 comet tracking mode - not recommended but it worked!). Would be much better to use a side-by-side setup like Ciarán's.

As an example of what's possible, here's 60 x 300secs Ha (Carl Zeiss 135/Atik314L+), drizzled to 5''/px on an infrequently-imaged faint area in Vela (Small and brighter RCW40 top slightly right)

Sam

RCW38.jpg

M42_Atik.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 15/08/2020 at 14:40, souls33k3r said:

You're a true artist mate. Every single image of yours is full of clarity and detail. I still ca not understand how you manage 20min exposures on this mount. I know balance is of utmost importance but still. Hats off to you mate. 

Thanks Ahmed, you're too kind. The mount is getting on a bit now, and is in serious need of a re-tune tbh. Even still, it can handle 20+ min exposures just fine. My max imaging scale is only about 1.5" (with the D5300) so nothing too strenuous, which plays a major part obviously. 

On 15/08/2020 at 16:38, Xsubmariner said:

Image looks great and interesting re-configuration of the lens. Nice to see the camera getting used by an expert.

Thanks Martin! Not sure how comfortable i am with being called an 'expert' though, lol. Happy to finally get using the camera i have to say. Thanks again for the sale, and the nice chat we had prior to it. 😀

On 15/08/2020 at 16:53, callisto said:

A very nice image indeed 👍

 

Mark

Cheers Mark. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 15/08/2020 at 19:24, tooth_dr said:

Looking good Ciarán and nice to see another KAF8300 getting used for widefield imaging. The 135mm gives a fair bit more FOV than the comparable shot I took with the 180mm lens. 

Thanks Adam. I've been wanting to do some widefield work (just as a change really) for a while now. Cygnus is a veritable NB treasure-trove, so i'm hoping to start a long-term project of doing a mosaic of this area in either bi-colour, or possibly all 3 channels. I did think of opting for a lens with a slightly longer FL, but with my imaging time being so low these days i thought 135mm might mean i actually have a chance of finishing it before retirement!

On 16/08/2020 at 10:34, Allinthehead said:

Great start Ciarán. Given the quality of your dslr images i'm looking forward to seeing what you can do with the mono.

Thanks Richard. I'm really liking mono i must say, although it's still early days and i've only really done one full NB image. At the moment, for broadband imaging the plan is to use the D5300 for colour and the Atik383 for Lum. I can't see me having the time to capture separate R, G, and B channels, but the jury is out until i actually try it. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SamK said:

Nice image and setup - Sh2-119 on the left gives a nice balance to the North American and Pelican.

I've also found vintage (and budget) M42 prime lenses work pretty well for wide-angle narrowband and give a lot of versatility to an existing telescopic setup.

My theory was that with only one wavelength to contend with in narrowband, there's no need to have expensive glass to counter chromatic aberration.

A few notes which might help in case anyone else tries this type of setup:

+Focussing - With patience, I found I could get good enough focus by hand (I measured FWHM in short test subs and adjusted the lens barrel).
+Guiding - Much easier than normal when imaging at 10''/px (works fine even if windy!)
+Drizzle - Since you'll almost certainly be oversampling compared to seeing, drizzle works well if you have lots of subs
+Aperture - With a Ha filter, wide open on a Carl Zeiss 135mm f/3.5 was pretty much the same as stopped down to f/4 and higher, same thing on a Asahi Pentax Takumar 200mm f/4.
+Mount attachment / Differential Flexure - Since the Atik314L+ doesn't have a screw mount on the bottom of the camera, I used a lens collar ring around the lens (see picture below). Even with a tight fit and extra felt tape around the lens barrel I sometimes got a bit of differential flexure (you can compensate for this to some extent using PHD2 comet tracking mode - not recommended but it worked!). Would be much better to use a side-by-side setup like Ciarán's.

As an example of what's possible, here's 60 x 300secs Ha (Carl Zeiss 135/Atik314L+), drizzled to 5''/px on an infrequently-imaged faint area in Vela (Small and brighter RCW40 top slightly right)

Sam

RCW38.jpg

M42_Atik.JPG

Thanks Sam. Nice to hear from another local member on here 👋

Great to see someone else trying this out too 😀  I agree, for NB work you don't need expensive glass at all, so there's plenty of opportunities for adding a cheap widefield setup, as long as you are prepared to accept it's limitations. 

It's early days yet whether or not i'll suffer from differential flexure. I'm just using an arca-swiss adaptor screwed to the bottom of the camera, but the lens isn't heavy, so fingers-crossed. The whole thing is sitting on a manfrotto 'thingy' (can't remember what it's called, lol), but it allows for about 150 degrees of rotation (in one axis only), which should be enough for most situations i hope. I also was thinking about Drizzling. However, my plan is to only capture about 100 mins (max) per panel in Ha (either 5 x 1200s or 10 x 600s), which won't give me enough subs to take advantage of it. Did your stars look significantly better after you drizzled? I'm currently at 8.4" and i was a little worried beforehand that they might come out a bit blocky, but i think they look decent enough. Not the best of course, but good enough for a big mosaic, where the focus will be on large-scale nebulosity. 

Nice image btw 😎

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ciarán

With a 60 image stack, drizzle definitely improved stars and brought out a bit more detail out in the nebula (below is Drizzle at 5''/px vs Standard at 10''/px enlarged in Photoshop). I found about 20 images would normally be required to make drizzle work well. I'd guess the main drawback in say 10 images for drizzle is that you'd get a lot more noise than a standard stack and that you'd want to be more careful to get dither working between frames (in PHD).

I think you'll be fine with differential flexure (my setup was substantially more botchy than yours). If you do get a problem, flex is a lot less of a problem with objects nearer the zenith! (when the camera is hanging vertically down)

DrizzleExample.gif

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SamK said:

Hi Ciarán

With a 60 image stack, drizzle definitely improved stars and brought out a bit more detail out in the nebula (below is Drizzle at 5''/px vs Standard at 10''/px enlarged in Photoshop). I found about 20 images would normally be required to make drizzle work well. I'd guess the main drawback in say 10 images for drizzle is that you'd get a lot more noise than a standard stack and that you'd want to be more careful to get dither working between frames (in PHD).

I think you'll be fine with differential flexure (my setup was substantially more botchy than yours). If you do get a problem, flex is a lot less of a problem with objects nearer the zenith! (when the camera is hanging vertically down)

DrizzleExample.gif

Thanks Sam. The drizzle is definitely making a difference for you. Good to know that 20 subs is around what it takes. 

I'll probably have to forego it myself though. With the 8300 chip being quite noisy, I need to do fewer longer subs, rather than a higher number of shorter ones. I could of course just shoot more subs, but I'm going to have to be pretty strict on limiting the exposure per panel, to have any chance of finishing the mosaic. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By elbaztardo
      Atik Horizon Mono
      EFW2
      Baader NB and LRGB Filters
      Boxed with cables.
      Looking for £1500\€1600
       
    • By Anthony RS
      Selling the Astronomik 12nm clip in Ha filter for 120€. Bought it for 270 usd including vat, customs and shipping so it's a really good price.

      The filter is still in excellent condition, used only twice. No fingerprints, no scratches not even dust (image attached).

      I will also handle the shipping through my post office without cost. If another shipping method is requested, then we'll have to to discuss the price.

      Contact me if interested.

      Clear Skies,
      Anthony

    • By Anthony RS
      Hello,
      I'm selling these 2 filters since I'm getting a mono astro cam. The filters are barely used and in perfect condition, no scratches, no fingerprints, not even dust. They are both amazing filters, probably the best investment I've made. I've attached some images
      taken with these filters, using a 100$ celestron newtonian, a 250$ Canon 500D and the infamous AVX. Also attached are images of the filters showing their perfect condition.
      Astronomik CLS-CCD Canon Clip in Filter: https://www.astronomik.com/en/filter-gegen-lichtverschmtzung-filters-against-lightpollution-lpr/cls-ccd-filter/clip-filter-eos-mit-astronomik-cls-ccd.html
      Original price including VAT is 155 Euros (around USD 182). I got it for around USD230 including VAT, shipping and custom taxes.
      Selling for USD 100.
      Astronomik Ha 12nm Canon Clip in Filter: https://www.astronomik.com/en/clip-filter/clip-filter-canon-aps-c/clip-filter-eos-mit-astronomik-h-alpha-ccd-12nm.html
      Original price including VAT 194 Euros (around USD 228). Got it for around USD 270 including VAT, shipping and custom taxes.
      Selling for USD 150
      I am willing to ship them on my own expense using LibanPost (from Lebanon). Shipping might take time; if you would like to use some other shipment method please contact me to discuss the price. 
      Feel free to buy one or both together.
      Let me know if you have any questions. 
      You can also contact me on <private email address removed>
      Cheers,
      Anthony









    • By Nikolas74
      As i would like to give it a try with a color camera and therefore need the funds i am selling my Mono camera setup.
      All come in original boxes in excellent working condition, filters have been in the filter wheel since i bought them.
      Atik 383l+ Mono boxed with all extras £900
      Astrodon Ha 3nm 36mm boxed £620 SOLD
      Astrodon Oiii 3nm 36mm boxed £620 SOLD
      Astrodon Lum 36mm boxed £180 SOLD
      I will be happy to send any photos to someone who is interested.
      Payment via Paypal in Uk Pounds or Euros (buyer will pays the fees if any)
      Safe and Secured shipping with tracking number. Postage expenses by me.
      Many thanks
      NikolasP.
       



    • By Horizon_Brave
      So...a question...let's say you want to shoot in a slightly light polluted area...but you also want to use the IR/UV cut filter...how can you use both then? You can only apply one filter at a time...so are is this a sort of 'pick your poison'? So you can't have IR/UV filtered along with Light pollution as well?
      For example here:
      https://expertphotography.com/best-astrophotography-filters/
       
      There's a ton of great filters...but how is it possible if you need a light pollution filter because of the area you're in..but you also want to cut IR/UV ? It seems like you can only do one at a time.
       
       
      Thanks all..
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.