Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Two Triangles


DaveS

Recommended Posts

Two completely different images of Fleming's Triangle, but which is better? And does the [NII] bring anything to the table?

This one was made in 2017 with the 130 apo, 0.75x reducer and Trius 694 with 6 hours in NHO from Bortle 8 Ruislip                This was made last month, 130 apo, TS flattener, ASI 1500 12 hours in SHO from Bortle 4 / 3 Dorset. 3 nm Astrodons and 10 min subs in each case

296371909_NHOver1.thumb.jpg.e847ce988e95bf419eca542dc5cd1b5e.jpg 1539230510_SHO444CropCBDDP.thumb.jpg.59657c15cd9826695f74cac0df7e186c.jpg

This wa processed in AstroArt 5                                                                                                                                                       This was AstroArt 7

No other processing.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.  You can see the difference but is the one with NII actually better?  I think not.  And this confirms what I found with the whole Cygnus loop - the amount of NII is negligible and the bi-colour image is good.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot see that the NII makes any difference either.

I did an experiment the other night with some data that I have on the Crescent area.  I subtracted a 3nmHa from a 7nm.  The result was inconclusive.  There were no fine structures at all, and the result could have been the result of different data stretches, or even slight flat field differences.

As an aside, last year I did an image of the Veil with 1 hour of Ha and 2 hours OIII - expecting the OIII to be much weaker.  This year, I have taken another 2 hours Ha, but I haven't been able to improve the image at all.  The Ha on it's own does look better, so this might be a processing issue.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, I waited rather than replying to each post.

I wasn't sure at first so wanted some independent assessments, but I'm coming to agree that [NII} doesn't bring anything to this,and in fact may just be recording the HII bleedthrough from the overlap of the passbands.

At least it means I won't be wasting my time or drive space haring after illusory data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at the two images side by side I think I prefer the new version as the colours look more subtle, less "in-yer-face", I think the resolution is better too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.