Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Stephan's Quintet


Datalord

Recommended Posts

I've been waiting for this beauty to get up and with the latest moonless nights I managed to get some proper imaging time in.

It's 5 galaxies visually close to each other, but NGC7320 is "only" about 40MLY away, while the four main galaxies, who are most likely in the middle of merging, are about 300MLY away.

742904513_StephansQuintet-Final.thumb.png.afd90fc028ac847d1578ea7b9feea9c8.png

 

Stephans_Quintet_Annotated.thumb.png.47da2141179ab085061c07626ae19c37.png

image.png.f7e697c3afd624022225f30da3cc877a.png

Edited by Datalord
Did a bit more processing on the image and updated it in place.
  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice shot. I've always wanted to take this picture myself. NGC7320 (foreground galaxy) is definately a bit bluer than the members at 300M light-year. I wonder if that is down to the extra red shift?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, rl said:

I wonder if that is down to the extra red shift?

I didn't think about that, but it does make some sense. 30 to 300 million, however, is not that much redshift. NGC7320 is redshifted at 800km/s, while the others are about 6500km/s. In the grand scheme of things that is not much when compared with the billions of years we otherwise see quasars at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using your figures, a back-of-envelope calculation suggests light at 500 nm would be shifted by 1.5 nm for the "local" galaxy and 10 nm for the others...not sure whether that would be visible or not. Probably a younger stellar population. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a very nice capture, one that's on my "to do" list.

I think the ring galaxy to the lower left, PGC69279 is now thought to be an outlier of the other 4, bringing it back up to 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, DaveS said:

That's a very nice capture, one that's on my "to do" list.

I think the ring galaxy to the lower left, PGC69279 is now thought to be an outlier of the other 4, bringing it back up to 5.

Thanks!

Yeah, I think I read that somewhere as well. But at 300MLY, the distance between that one and the other four must be 10s of MLY. My trigonometry skills are not what they used to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.