Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg

2” dielectric vs 1,25 star diagonal


Recommended Posts

A short question i cant find an answer for.  What is the best option to mount to the back of a C8.  Does a 2” give a better view than a 1,25”?   I have just 1 dielectric diagonal.  And that’s the 2”.  My other diagonal is the stardiagonal that came with the C8, that’s the 1,25”.  
Most of my eyepieces are 1,25”, but of course fit the adapter of the 2”.  
 

thx for helping me out...

Edited by Robindonne
Link to post
Share on other sites

With 1.25” eyepieces it doesn’t matter what size diagonal you use as long as it is decent quality. No real advantage in a 2” diagonal other than it lets you use long focal length 2” eyepieces.

Just get a 2” visual back. The Baader is nice but a bit expensive but good quality ones can be had for about £20.00.

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/baader-click-lock-2-for-celestron-meade-sct.html

Or cheaper alternative.

https://www.harrisontelescopes.co.uk/acatalog/revelation-sct-2-visual-back.html#SID=627

Edited by johninderby
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, johninderby said:

With 1.25” eyepieces it doesn’t matter what size diagonal you use as long as it is decent quality. No real advantage in a 2” diagonal other than it lets you use long focal length 2” eyepieces.

Just get a 2” visual back. The Baader is nice but a bit expensive but good quality ones can be had for about £20.00.

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/baader-click-lock-2-for-celestron-meade-sct.html

Or cheaper alternative.

https://www.harrisontelescopes.co.uk/acatalog/revelation-sct-2-visual-back.html#SID=627

Ah thx.  Well i have some visual backs.  Some different types of 1,25 and 2”.   I was just wondering if the 1,25 diagonal wont show all. Dont know how to describe.....a cropped view?

So in my case, only having one decent diagonal, the 2”, its better to mount that one tonight.   
 

Just thought of it while assembling everything. I realised i dont have a good 1,25” diagonal.  Immediately added it to my to-buy list.  
But then a new question pops up: Does one really need a good 1,25” diagonal, while almost every scope supports a 2”?
 

Edited by Robindonne
Link to post
Share on other sites

With a 1.25” eyepiece the field stop in the eyepiece is smaller than 1.25” so not problem with vignetting (cropping). using a 1.25” diagonal.

But as you have the 2” visual back and 2” diagonal then it makes sense to use that. You might want to get a long focal length 2” eyepiece some day.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this help...?

867462112_re-moddedETX105SCTstardiagonal.thumb.jpg.0a8b2e97a3b9500b1a1ce91262c4a2e1.jpg2144000928_re-moddedETX105SCTstardiagonal(closeup).thumb.jpg.bd984209b84c1aca15aaaf7f00776cd4.jpg

I feel a lot happier with this on the backend of my ETX105; (or C6/SCT-xlt); than with a 1.25" push-fit, especially when using these 'old skool bad-boyz!'...

517405460_type1.jpg.6081a9d066256d23c85f03f0907fd47f.jpg548055074_series4000uwa.jpg.dfcf28115e9eb29ce73faa4351897806.jpg

That said, a 1.25" twist-lock maybe just as secure.

 

small_IMG_0385.JPG..jpg.96b510aeac1ce230208486066271a09d.jpgPIC011.JPG.d44aaf7659477cb4cf6a80da07ee9215.JPGPIC012.JPG.3b3b2b4aaf9826a35f9fd23345ee7b76.JPG

Just a few few images of my 're-modded' ETX105 with an ETX-SCT adapter ring and SCT-1.25" push-fit visual back. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.