Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Bubble nebula reprocess


cuivenion

Recommended Posts

This was originally a four hour image taken in 2018. I've thrown about 2 1/2 hours of data away because the conditions on the second night of imaging weren't very good. Taken with a HEQ5 and 130pds with an asi224.

The original image, 4 hours of exposure:

Test2.thumb.jpg.1650e61604b7ddf353f9d1caa01743a1.jpg.5b6fe1660baca679dd9642e9f9f9929d.jpg

 

The reprocess, 1 hour and 36 minutes:

1189774383_FinalICC.thumb.jpg.289c5d2cbcd6ac65d339021e80c54fc6.jpg

I'll definitely have to add more time to it. What do you guys think, better? worse? Go for something inbetween?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, There was a lot of subs that were effected by thin cloud which raised the FWHM. I've always wondered if I should keep data like that or not. Guess I should unless star shapes are really bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, I've probably been a bit too ruthless with subs, and on other images as well, the processing on the second is pants as well I've been experimenting with starnet and dimmed the stars too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.