Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep9_banner.thumb.jpg.05c1bdd298547fd225896a3d99c9bc17.jpg

jamesj01

Recently purchased Celestron 127EQ recommendations

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone - juts purchased my first telescope and am asking for advice on what is best to be seen through this telescope as a starter - have already seen the moon and some distant stars and am comfortable with using all of the eye pieces included. What would anyone recommend?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi @jamesj01 and welcome to SGL. :hello2:

I am not au-fait with your 'scope; but I would start gradually; (and depending on your budget); and suggest these...

  • a variable polarising filter.
  • a Baader neodymimum filter - I refer to this as my 'Swiss Army knife' filter.
  • something from the BST Starguider e/p series. I think they have a 60 deg AFOV - https://www.firstlightoptics.com/bst-starguider-eyepieces.html - do not waste your money on an eyepiece or 'coloured' filter set. You may not use all the e/p's or filters - maybe of a 'poorer quality' than individually purchased ones.
  • maybe' 8-24mm zoom e/p - Seben do a 'pretty good' one - avoid the 7-21mm.
  • if you fancy observing the Sun in white-light, a full aperture solar filter; (either DIY or ready made) - remember to remove or make a small solar filter for the finderscope - they will need to be checked for defects before each an every use.

1_25filter.jpg.7ec846496e5cb1023cb990df9a7099a4.jpg5addf27ccac70_variablemoonfilter.jpg.e490ce031fc7badb2a139b6d8384c995.jpgneodymium.jpg.3079ff2df6006c18dd7da5e81683d4cc.jpg

Above are images of the variable polarising filter; (other brands are available); I use and the Baader neodymium filter; (the larger one is the 2").

Edited by Philip R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you very much @Philip R - helped me out alot!

So, does the variable polarising filter serve the same function as the Baader Neodymium filter? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

The variable polarising filter I mainly use for use when observing the Moon when near or full and Venus. You rotate the filter cells to the desired level of attenuation/gain your eyes are comfortable with. 

The neodymium sort of acts as a 'contrast booster'*, 'skyglow', (more of a UV/IR filter). Enhances detail of Moon, Mars, Jupiter or Saturn or the phases of Venus, (though I prefer a #47 (violet) for it; when used with my C6/XLT-SCT). It is one of those Marmite filters... you either 'love it' or 'hate it'. It is not a substitute for a light pollution filter, but certainly an improvement as local authorities are now using LED street lighting, it is better. Cheaper light pollution filters are not really worth investing in now; as LED's tend to be brighter at the higher/blue end of the light spectrum.  

Other SGL'er's may agree or disagree with what I have said, but this is my opinion.

 

* Baader Planetarium also do a dedicated 'Contrast Booster' - these are usually used with refractor 'scopes.  

Edited by Philip R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you @Mick H

this will be very useful so will have a look to purchase one :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Philip R that's brilliant - good information so will have a look also at these options. What would you recommend pointing my telescope at apart from planets for a beginner?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry can't help much there, as I am mainly solar, lunar and planetary. That said, this time of year there is M57 in Lyra; the Virgo constellation is rich with deep sky stuff and later the Cygnus constellation too.

The best advice I will give here, is to download a copy of Stellarium. It is free for computer use and about £2.99 for phone or tablet; though it is not released by the same software developer. Other free or paid apps are also available.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Philip R will do thank you - cheers for the brilliant advice - enjoy the Space X launch aswell

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now if we could persuade Mr E. Musk and team to bring back some non-working satellites on the return leg, as it is getting a tad congested up there, that would be awesome. I have just checked Heavens-Above on my Android Tablet and there is a lot of Starlink sattelites visible from about 21:50BST (20:50GMT) over my location.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

@Philip R i tried having a look but they were to low in the sky for me :( i agree though it is getting congested. However the launch was spectacular

One more question, what eyepiece/s would you recommend to purchase to lets say view the Andromeda galaxy or to scour the night sky?  

Edited by jamesj01

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi again @jamesj01.

Eyepieces I think are pretty much a personal choice. I myself, prefer TeleVue. They are sharp and give good contrast; but they do come at premium prices for the exotic models. The BST Starguiders... https://www.firstlightoptics.com/bst-starguider-eyepieces.html are good value, starting from under £50.00GBP each; or there is the Vixen NPL series... https://www.firstlightoptics.com/vixen-eyepieces/vixen-npl-eyepieces.html starting from under £40.00GBP each. The BST's are 60deg AFOV and NPL's are 50deg AFOV. I am not sure of the eye-relief on them; but I believe they are comfortable for many users. For deep sky, low to medium power wide-field e/p's would be a better choice.

SGL'ers @John,@rwilkey & @Louis D may offer better advice and suggestions. 

The image below is of my 'one-to-many' TeleVue 13mm e/p's as per my current/present signature.

PIC044.JPG.54acb21c9b4e6e69cda54fdd37a1defe.JPG

They are: Plossl (left) Nagler type 1 (centre) Nagler type 6 (right) -
the Plossl gives a 50deg AFOV - the Nagler's give an 82deg AFOV.

Edited by Philip R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, jamesj01 said:

What would you recommend pointing my telescope at apart from planets for a beginner?

As Philip said download Stellarium:

https://stellarium.org

Or SkyPortal free for IOS:

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/celestron-skyportal/id877780544

I like viewing open/globular clusters try M44 the Beehive cluster, open cluster in the constellation Cancer.

Also M13 Great Globular Cluster in the constellation of Hercules.

Edited by Mick H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Philip R have had a look at the eyepieces and the BST starguiders look ideal. Many thanks for this. What mm eyepieces are low to medium powered?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Mick H also thanks for this, stellarium proves to be extremely useful. will also have a look at your recommended clusters. are they good to capture in astrophotography?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, jamesj01 said:

@Philip R have had a look at the eyepieces and the BST starguiders look ideal. Many thanks for this. What mm eyepieces are low to medium powered?

Hello.

Brand:    LOW:               MEDIUM:     HIGH:
BST's...  25mm             12-18mm       3.2-8mm
NPL's... 30*-40mm      20*-10mm      4-8mm

* Personally, if it was me, I think I would choose either of these as my 'low' magnification. 

 

I would recommend you play with the 'FOV Calculator' in the 'Resources' tab, to give you an idea... or bite the bullet and go for the Baader Planetarium 8-24mm [mk lll or lV] zoom. I have tried one and it is surprisingly good. I am thinking of adding one to my e/p collection in the future. As I said yesterday: "Eyepieces I think are pretty much a personal choice..."

Also note that if you are adding a Barlow lens, it multiplies the e/p focal length by a given factor. I have a 2.8X and a 4X, so every e/p I use, it has to multiplied by the factor of 2.8 or 4.

 

Edited by Philip R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jamesj01 said:

@Mick H also thanks for this, stellarium proves to be extremely useful. will also have a look at your recommended clusters. are they good to capture in astrophotography?

James, I don't do astrophotography so have no idea, but Neil took a nice pic of M13 found here:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Philip R think i am starting to understand - so high power lenses for objects such as the moon and lower power for deep sky correct?

Both look brilliant and will have a go with the resources tab. Many thanks

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jamesj01 said:

@Philip R think i am starting to understand - so high power lenses for objects such as the moon and lower power for deep sky correct?

Both look brilliant and will have a go with the resources tab. Many thanks

In a nutshell... yes! :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

@Philip R brilliant thanks for this :) took my first moon shot - stunning if i say so but sadly one of the easier things to photograph in the sky 

Edited by jamesj01
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Philip R@Mick H

Sorry am full of questions - if i were to take a photo of a nebula such as the one included in the photo attached, do they appear as that dark red/purple colour or do i have to apply a filter of some sort?

2020-05-31.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi @jamesj01. To get colour in images of DSO does require the use of filters, darks, flats, subs, etc., and processing. The human eye has not been adapted to see extremely well in the dark and some DSO targets will appear as 'grey fuzzy' or whatever. If you wish to pursue astro-imaging does require a lot of patience. Be prepared for disappointment and sleepless nights, etc., plus a whole lot of other things. I would recommend you obtain a copy of this book: 'Make Every Photon Count' and the follow-up book. Sorry, but the name of the follow-up book has escaped me at this time; as has the authors name, but I know he is an SGL'er.

If you want the laid-back approach to astro-imaging; then have a look at @rorymultistorey youtube channel 'astrobiscuit'.

There are other books and youtube channels dedicated to astro-imaging; plus here on SGL. 

Edited by Philip R
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By StarGazingSiouxsie
      Hello there,
      I told you it wouldn't be long before I started asking for help!
      I can download CFM from Celestron's support page. I download the zipped file, extract the contents but that's as far as I can get. 
      The file in the unzipped file shows as a 'Jar' file instead of an exe. That naugghty little jar justs sits there and will not dance for me. 
      I am running Windows 10. I have latest version of Java installed. I have tried turning around 3 times with one hand on my head and one on my tummy. No luck.
      I am neuro A typical, for the record, so that accounts for why I absolutely MUST know how to (please) open this file even though the odds are my kit is up to date. 
      Seriously, this is driving me nuts. I found stargazerslounge via my searches in trying to solve this problem and I thought to myself what a nice vibe this ite has. so I joined. 
      Any help / advice / chocolate (milk or dark) , money (PP or cash  ) all very gratfefully and cheek kissingly received. 
    • By MountainDog
      I have recently purchased a Celestron NXT130 and have the following questions regarding planet viewing. I have obseved the moon, Jupiter and Saturn using the 25mm lens ( with and without the Barlow) with good results. However, when I switch from the 25mm to the 9mm lens (with or without the Barlow), I either can no longer see the planet (Jupiter and Saturn) or cannot properly focus (moon). I can understand that the moon may be too close for the 9mm to be effective, but I am a bit stumped about the other planets.
      Looking for advice.
    • By Arshad Wali Muhammad
      When I align my Celestron CPC 1100 EdgeHD through Starsense Auto Allignment, after Completing the successful plates resolve in the handset, you have to press enter to continue to the second stage of selecting a bright star to point scope towards it, which I used to do in the past. Today after successful plate resolve, when I tried to press enter it takes you back to the first screen “Star Sense Ready” instead of selecting the brightest star option. Can anyone help and advise where am I making mistake ?
    • By Arshad Wali Muhammad
      Hi. I’ve Celestron cpc 1100 EdgeHD. When I try to allign the scope through skyportal via WiFi module, after completing the plate solving process, it asks me to select one brightest star and press go-to option to move the scope towards that star for example Vega. In skyportal it stops at an exact Vega location, however in eyepiece I can’t see it. I know I have to fine allign, so when I manually fine allign the scope in the eyepiece, the cross mark in the skyportal moves far away from Vega and then refuses to allign because it has to be Certain degree close to Vega. Can anyone advise how to fix it ?
    • By Arshad Wali Muhammad
      Hi. I have Celestron CPC 1100 EdgeHD with Starsense and WiFi Module. During the alignment process, WiFi module stops responding, whereas my tablet or iPhone is connected to the WiFi module,  the SkyPortal message pops up that connection is failed and scope isn’t responding? Can anyone help me how t fix this urgently ? It was working fine yesterday but now I can see this message. I though it’s a power issue, so I disconnected the power tank and connected the scope directly to the electricity through supplied adapter, but failed. 


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.