Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Hi. I want to buy Celestron Evolution 9.25 with startsense. I have heard star sense isn’t avbl in 9.25 but 8.0. Is it true ? Is starsense very useful ? What’s actually is starsense is ? Because I’m not interested in 8 inch. Secondly is it better then 11 inch  CGX EQUATORIAL 1100 SCHMIDT-CASSEGRAIN TELESCOPE? If not what’s the difference in terms of object clearity ? Secondly is Celestron motorized ? I mean to say the object moves very fast, so can it track the object live ? Please advise. 



Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should download the specification and product description sheets and read them.

You can buy any of the Celestron scopes without the Starsense if you shop around. The Starsense is an accessory which some dealers are bundling with the high priced scopes. Or you can order the Starsense separately at any time and attach it yourself.

Briefly, the Starsense automates the alignment part of the setup procedure. It eliminates a tiresome operation and saves some time. Whether this is worth £300 in your currency is up to you.

Edited by Cosmic Geoff
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 9.25 is a very good visual scope. It isn't so good for astro photography. It is also a heavy scope. It is 9 kg for the tube alone. My advice would be to move to the 11" since it is only 12.7 kg which isn't much more than the 9.25 and gives you significantly more light grasp. Having said that I would recommend the 203mm/8" EdgeHD version. Reason being is that with the EdgeHD you get refractor (uses lens) like views from a reflector (uses mirrors), it has the option of installing the TEMPest fans from Deep Space Products which take the time to cool the mirrors down by about 1/2 so you go from waiting an hour+ for the mirrors to cool to about 30 minutes, and it is designed to use as a astro photography (AP) scope for both deep space objects (DSO) and planets though you will want an equatorial mount for AP.

As to the StarSense, it is a way to completely automate the alignment process of the mount. With a GOTO mount you have to align it so it knows where it is in the world. You do this by centering 2 stars in the eyepiece (EP) for alignment then 2-4 additional stars to calibrate the alignment. The more calibration stars you use the better the alignment and the better it will point to objects. With my Celestron mounts I always use 4 calibration stars. This can be a time saver and make the process more automatic. You need to decide if this is something worth the extra money or not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

The TEMPest fans are presumably designed to circulate air through the tube so that the optics cool down to ambient temperature more quickly and achieve best performance  sooner.  Before buying them, you should carefully check the specification of the EDGE HD 1100 to see if it doesn't already include equivalent fans.

Re the wedge, first explain why you want to put the scope on a wedge. This will convert the mount to a fork equatorial mount, which would only be required for long exposure imaging of deep space objects.  Despite what the manufacturers and retailers may say, feedback from users of these scopes is that after trying the wedge for these purposes many of them give up and buy a German equatorial mount and a different telescope for the purpose.   If this is indeed your aim, I suggest the additional purchase of an EQ-6 Sky-watcher mount and a small aperture short focal length apochromatic telescope, and the book "Making Every Photon Count."  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, if you live near the equator, I think I am correct in saying that putting the CPC1100 on a wedge would entail laying the mount almost on its side, which could place an excessive strain on the bearings.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Arshad Wali Muhammad said:

Thank You very much I have bought Celestron CPC 1100 EdgeHD, but what’s TemPest fans ? and where to fit? Secondly they sent Alt Azm Mount so can I add wedge ? I live near equator. 

These are the ones, should be able to get some specifically for your scope. The Edge optics actually block the rear baffle tube I believe, making cooling harder so these fans seem like a good idea.


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By StarPrincess
      Moon Surface 16 April 2021 21:32 Celestron NexStar 6SE ZWO ASI 462mc
    • By Astro_Dad
      Looking forward to receiving my 102MC in the next few days/weeks depending on supply. Does anyone have any experience, tips/advice?  Looks like a good grab and go particularity for planetary observation - interesting “next generation” mount. 
    • By Camalajs525
      So I'm having some issues recently and have a lot of questions for the erecting eyepiece 1.5x. I want to know if they are useful, better, and i also want to know if they have a lot of detail in them. How do you use a erecting eyepiece? What is it for? When can i use it? Also my issue is when I try to use an erecting eyepiece on a star it is out of focus and cant seem to find the right focus.  yesterday I had tried on sirius but it just showed me a huge ball of light. Any help and tips will be appreciated.
    • By lyfestyle
      Hello all, my name is Paige. I am a college student and new to the stargazing community. I know all about the constellations and astronomy, but i’ve never bought anything to see the stars up close. I’ve read through the forum and come to the conclusions I want to start with some well built binoculars and eventually get into telescopes. The 7 x 50 seem to be the common starting point but I would love to get something with a bit more clarity, and preferably still handheld.  I’ve also read up on some binoculars already and the big brands that jump out are Celestron and Orion, so I would love some opinions on those because they don’t seem to be reliable in the long run. I only have one shot on a good pair and I dont plan on buying any other equipment until i’ve mastered the binoculars! Price range up to around $300 so any tips would be amazing!
      Thank you, happy sky watching 🌌
    • By onefistinthestars
      To celebrate the 25th anniversary of Sir Patrick's DSO catalogue, I've added the available Caldwells to my basic Marathon search sequence. 
      Those interested may be pleasantly surprised by how many of the additional treasures are only a short hop from a given (or en route to the next) Messier.
      The sequence for 40°N can be found at the SEDS Messier Marathon homepage or at my blog.
      Peace, Stephen
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.