Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Iris Nebula - Processing Help Please!


Recommended Posts

I've been having another crack at DSO imaging lately, and I've managed to produce this from 6 hours of integration: 

I'm quite pleased with it but I'm very new to image processing, so I'd be incredibly grateful if someone wouldn't mind having a go at processing my data!

Iris6.thumb.jpg.914b49e837fb96553a986ddb04c65713.jpg

Image Info:

  • Lights: 46x4min + 66x3min 
  • Stacked with Dark, Flat and Bias frames
  • Stacked in DSS and processed in GIMP
  • Taken under Bortle 7/8 skies

Gear:

  • SkyWatcher ED80
  • 0.85x Reducer
  • Astro-Modified EOS 600D
  • ZWO ASI 120MM Mini Guide Camera with 9x50 Finderscope
  • HEQ5 Pro Mount

There's some dust bunnies and other artefacts on the image that I know I could spend more time removing, however I'm wondering if I'm doing my data justice in processing!

Thanks, Tom

NGC7023 (2).TIF

Edited by trunting
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, trunting said:

I've been having another crack at DSO imaging lately, and I've managed to produce this from 6 hours of integration: 

I'm quite pleased with it but I'm very new to image processing, so I'd be incredibly grateful if someone wouldn't mind having a go at processing my data!

Iris6.thumb.jpg.914b49e837fb96553a986ddb04c65713.jpg

Image Info:

  • Lights: 46x4min + 66x3min 
  • Stacked with Dark, Flat and Bias frames
  • Stacked in DSS and processed in GIMP
  • Taken under Bortle 7/8 skies

Gear:

  • SkyWatcher ED80
  • 0.85x Reducer
  • Astro-Modified EOS 600D
  • ZWO ASI 120MM Mini Guide Camera with 9x50 Finderscope
  • HEQ5 Pro Mount

There's some dust bunnies and other artefacts on the image that I know I could spend more time removing, however I'm wondering if I'm doing my data justice in processing!

Thanks, Tom

NGC7023 (2).TIF 254.32 MB · 0 downloads

Hi Tom

The fact that you have dust bunnies and light/dark patches in the image means that the flats arent working.  If the calibration data is right then processing is much easier.   It looks pretty decent what you have done, especially from very poor skies.

I remove the light pollution gradient, and stretched it heavily to reveal the dust etc, attached below.

NGC7023_2_-lpc-cbg-csc-SC-St.thumb.jpg.4198df8c7b9ecce5d3e2195ccec2a734.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

 attached below

Wow thank you! I will look into improving the flats. I'm currently using a t-shirt and a bright light, any tips?

Also would you mind telling me what processing steps you followed? I find myself struggling when it comes to colour and you've done a nice job there :)

Edited by trunting
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got some nice colour there, but as Toothdragon says, the flats haven't worked - they should eliminate the dust bunnies.  

Here's a crop of the central area, very quickly (<5min)  processed in StarTools.  Just a stretch, wipe, decon and colour:

117550331_NGC7023(2).jpg.9541bdbfae69de512e31186b1a1f23a8.jpg

 

definitely one to persist with, it took me ages to get that much detail!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, trunting said:

Wow thank you! I will look into improving the flats. I'm currently using a t-shirt and a bright light, any tips?

Also would you mind telling me what processing steps you followed? I find myself struggling when it comes to colour and you've done a nice job there :)

The technique is good, but perhaps use the sky rather than a light unless it's very diffuse.   Since you are using an ED80, a computer monitor or even an ipad/tablet, would be a good even light source.  Also there is some new dust and moved dust, so try to take your flats straight after imaging, or at the very least, dont move the camera or focuser if you take the kit indoors.  Set the camera to AV mode and it wil detemine the correct exposure.  You want it maybe 1/100 so if it's 1/2000 then the lights too bright, so use more fabric.

I just ran it through Astro Pixel Processor.  I didnt procees it other than remove LP and stretch.  You are off to a great start though, get the flats sorted and the image processing will be easier :D

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding flats I've always used a laptop screen with notepad, recently I bought an LED light and found that does just as good a job, probably better. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've spent a few days playing around with StarTools (thanks @almcl! Oh and Ivo of course for creating such an awesome program) and managed to get out last night. Did my flats properly (thanks @tooth_dr!) and managed to produce this off of 90min on NGC7000.

 

Needless to say I'm chuffed with the result, thank you everyone for your input 😁

NGC7000.png.e614a67377569f234242b4062c629ebc.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.