Leo Triplet

[Stu Wilson]

Nowhere near as good as I wanted it but I lost quite a lot of frames due to satelites and meteors. only about 35 mins of data in all with flats darks bias etc, tried my best in Photoshop.

 

Stu

[MarkAR]

Good effort with so much lost data.

[Stu Wilson]

It seems like focus is a little out too. Maybe just me. I'm tired.

[Erling G-P]

Not bad for such short integration time.  They do appear very green on my monitor though.

Have you tried using the frames with meteor and/or sattelites ?   I use DSS too, and always have some frames with sattelite trails, but they don't show in the final stack - believe DSS removes them in the process.

[Dragon_Astro]

It’s not THAT bad, fair bit of detail there.

obviously rather green, but that can be sorted with colour balance in photoshop

[Stu Wilson]

6 hours ago, Dragon_Astro said:

It’s not THAT bad, fair bit of detail there.

obviously rather green, but that can be sorted with colour balance in photoshop

Think ill have a tweak around in PS after work.

[Xplode]

11 hours ago, Stu Wilson said:

Nowhere near as good as I wanted it but I lost quite a lot of frames due to satelites and meteors. only about 35 mins of data in all with flats darks bias etc, tried my best in Photoshop.

 

Stu

You don't loose image due to satelites, but instead a lack of knowledge, with correct stacking settings any satellites will be removed during stacking.
Look for Kappa Sigma something in DSS under integration settings (it's important that you got enough images thou, i think 8 is minimum and the more the better)
 

Here's Abell 1656 stacked with settings to not remove satelites and other outliers in the image.

 

Here's the final result with settings to remove satelites

 

Your image is actually very good except for the green tint, here it has been removed by SCNR in Pixinsight

 

 

 

[Stu Wilson]

that looks good.

ive tried to do it again and get rid of the green.

see what happens here.....

 

Stuie

[Stu Wilson]

Think your version was better tho lol