Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have taken mono LRGB images of M51 with my new ASI1600mm-PRO.

I have a mix of 30s, 60s, 120s subs. 100 darks, and 100 flats for each filter. About 4 hours total.

I Used DSS for alignment and stacking, then Pixinsight for LRGB combination.

My issue is that i'm not happy with the colours, the stars all appear white and the background is strange.

I have attached the Aligned LRGB images.

Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks!

image.png.5054a159ee91138d63c3fb88710136d6.png

Green.TIF red.TIF Lum.TIF B.TIF

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I downloaded your data, and it seems that you have some calibration and stacking errors. For one, your luminance has an inverted vignetting pattern. Are your calibration files working ok? With cmos cameras, your darks MUST match your lights in temperature and exposure time. If you use 3 different exposure times, you need 3 different darks. Scaling darks doesn't work.

I'm processing your data, and will get back with the results.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, wimvb said:

I downloaded your data, and it seems that you have some calibration and stacking errors. For one, your luminance has an inverted vignetting pattern. Are your calibration files working ok? With cmos cameras, your darks MUST match your lights in temperature and exposure time. If you use 3 different exposure times, you need 3 different darks. Scaling darks doesn't work.

I'm processing your data, and will get back with the results.

Hi, all images are taken at -20. I have dark's for all my light exposure times. 

I will investigate the inverted vignetting, and double check DSS to make sure its using the correct files.

Thanks for you help!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't get colour calibration working. The histogram also shows that your R and B masters are identical. Can you check that the stacking process produced the correct output.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, wimvb said:

I can't get colour calibration working. The histogram also shows that your R and B masters are identical. Can you check that the stacking process produced the correct output.

Okay, interesting... I will regenerate them more carefully and repost them. Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, wimvb said:

I can't get colour calibration working. The histogram also shows that your R and B masters are identical. Can you check that the stacking process produced the correct output.

Hi, I have generated new LRGB from DSS. As far as I can tell, they are using the correct files.

B.TIF G.TIF R.TIF L.TIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

m51_lrgb.thumb.jpg.992372377a519e0424df796194728dc6.jpg

A bit noisy. Cmos works best with LOTS of subs. Try to collect at least 100 L subs. You can collect fewer rgb and blur the rgb image before lrgb combination.

My process in short:

  • aligned the new r, g, and b masters with the first L master. The newest L has subs that were rotated too much, so I used the old L
  • cropped L and R, G, B masters, then applied DBE to all.
  • rgb combination

RGB:

  • background neutralization
  • photometric color calibration
  • arcsinh stretch
  • desaturated the background with a range mask to protect the galaxy and stars
  • convolution 
  • saturation enhancement

L:

  • deconvolution
  • histogram transformation
  • hrd compression
  • curves transformation

LRGB combination

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, wimvb said:

m51_lrgb.thumb.jpg.992372377a519e0424df796194728dc6.jpg

A bit noisy. Cmos works best with LOTS of subs. Try to collect at least 100 L subs. You can collect fewer rgb and blur the rgb image before lrgb combination.

My process in short:

  • aligned the new r, g, and b masters with the first L master. The newest L has subs that were rotated too much, so I used the old L
  • cropped L and R, G, B masters, then applied DBE to all.
  • rgb combination

RGB:

  • background neutralization
  • photometric color calibration
  • arcsinh stretch
  • desaturated the background with a range mask to protect the galaxy and stars
  • convolution 
  • saturation enhancement

L:

  • deconvolution
  • histogram transformation
  • hrd compression
  • curves transformation

LRGB combination

Okay :) Great result! Yes I agree, more subs.

I shall try your process. Still a lot more to learn but I'm getting there.

Thanks for the help, it means a lot!

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, chriscoles said:

Yes I agree, more subs.

A rule of thumb that I use is that if the main target looks noisy when only stf applied, but otherwise still linear, then more or longer subs are needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 12/04/2020 at 23:34, wimvb said:

A rule of thumb that I use is that if the main target looks noisy when only stf applied, but otherwise still linear, then more or longer subs are needed.

Okay, so last night was clear :) And I have more subs. I have stacked them again. I also took more darks for good measure.

I combined the channels in Pixinsight, however don't yet know how to bring the colours out...?

Using the gimp I can, though would like to do it all in PI eventually.

I tried Photometry-Based Color Calibration but got errors, see below.?

Getting there... Thanks!

image.thumb.png.bf21e0e66b8db402f0a1d9cbda85c901.png

 

B_new.TIF G_new.TIF R_new.TIF L_new.TIF

 

 

 

image.png

 

 

Edited by chriscoles
repeated images
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you need to enter your pixel size and fl for plate solving to work.

After colour calibration, stretch the rgb with arcsinh stretch. This preserves and boosts colour.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, what a great image 🙂 

I think I too need to drastically improve my processing. I think with me it just takes so long at the moment, mostly because I always have to follow some instructions as I cannot remember what to do off my own back. I guess if you practice and you understand fully what you are doing instead of blindly following some instructions written by others then it will both be quicker to process and the results will improve.

I have just purchased this great guide for PI. Whilst it will not give me great images immediately I think it will greatly help me in the long run. I don't know whether it is something that may help you ?

 http://www.deepskycolors.com/mastering-pixinsight.html

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

it just takes so long at the moment, mostly because I always have to follow some instructions as I cannot remember what to do off my own back

That's how I started too.

3 hours ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

I guess if you practice and you understand fully what you are doing instead of blindly following some instructions written by others then it will both be quicker to process and the results will improve

Yes, it just takes time.

 

3 hours ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

I don't know whether it is something that may help you ?

 http://www.deepskycolors.com/mastering-pixinsight.html

Steve

It definitely will. Study not just the processes, but also the PI methodology: an image consists of lightness zones, and also levels of detail, called wavelets or layers. The layer concept of PI has nothing to do with the layer concept of PS/GIMP.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the book recommendation, for now i'm quite happy playing around with PI. May look at books when I get deeper into it.

Made improvements to my image, and because of all the clear nights I have started on the Cigar Galaxy too.

 

image.thumb.png.26a2c29bee23725e13650ed5f5f19c94.png

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jacko61
      After some trial and error I'm getting some very good guiding results with PHD2 now. 60mm guidescope and ASI290MM mini camera. The M42 image taken late March was 12 x 15 second exposures taken manually with my dslr / C8 and a stopwatch. Stacked in DSS and played with a bit in GIMP. On the night I couldn't get APT to register the camera - turned out to be the mini USB cable (although later trials point to the socket in the camera being a bit loose too). 
      Bought an iOPTRON iPOLAR that arrived on Friday and had a play with that which has resulted in near perfect polar alignment. 2 star alignment and an additional 2 calibration stars on my Advanced GT mount means I'm getting very accurate GOTOs now and PHD2 (through the ST4 port on the ASI camera) seems to be guiding very well.  Last night after more cable faffing I managed to get everything working together to the point where I felt confident enough to leave it running by itself for an hour and a half (45 minutes of 180 second exposures plus 3 minutes each exposure to save the file - I've since found out I shouldn't have noise reduction switched on in the camera - DOH!) so M51 is 15 x 180 second @ ISO 800 lights and 5 x 180 second darks.  A little manipulation in GIMP and I think it's come out very well. Obviously still have a lot to learn and I'm going to have to start taking much longer exposures  but I'm quite pleased with these 2 pictures. 
      Graeme.
       

       

    • By Lee_P
      Hi SGLers,
      I’m hoping a PixInsight guru can help me. I’m a PI beginner, but am having fun learning. My question is about the level of noise in my images. After integrating and performing an STF stretch, the resulting image always looks quite smooth. But it doesn’t take long at all – just a DBE really, maybe then a gentle stretch – for the image to become really noisy. And then a lot of my editing is centred on battling that noise. My camera is an ASI2600MC-Pro, which I cool to -10. For a recent experiment, I gathered 20 hours of data from 120s subs. With that much integration time, and the low-noise camera, I was hoping for lower noise than I actually got. (I am shooting from Bortle 8, however).
      So my question is: are my expectations wrong, and actually the amount of noise I have is what’s to be expected? Or, have I messed something up in pre-processing or integration?
      In case it’s useful, I ran SCRIPT -> ImageAnalysis -> Noise Evaluation on the image straight out of integration and got the following:
      Ch | noise | count(%) | layers |
      ---+-----------+-----------+--------+
      0 | 2.626e-01 | 18.39 | 4 |
      1 | 1.037e-01 | 12.01 | 4 |
      2 | 1.636e-01 | 11.10 | 4 |
      ---+-----------+-----------+--------+
       
      I’ve also uploaded the file (1.16Gb) for anyone kind enough to help investigate further:
      https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wB3May69oEWniF8hikueUkSS-TJvjMKC?usp=sharing
       
      Thanks!
      -Lee
    • By alexbb
      This is another finished target for this season.
      I (quite) recently bought a TS Photoline 102 ED with FPL53 which performs surprisingly well for a doublet. So I put it to tests and imaging, in parallel with an older FPL51 AstroProfessional 102 ED doublet.
      The blue color correction is much better in the newer TS. I shoot luminance often with both and then take the highlights from the better scope.
      For this image I also used some older data that I had available, shot with a 130PDS, but that maybe only made my life more difficult. Not that otherwise I shot data through the refractors in a single panel with reducers/correctors, but also in 2 panels with no reducing correctors. Same about the RGB. Some shorter exposures from the backyard, some from a dark site, most of the G data from a dark site, B and R from home (clouds came in at the dark site) and a lot of other adventures.
      But in the end I managed to put them all together and made an image out of them.
      You can watch it in full resolution and see other details on astrobin: Great Orion Nebula
      Clear skies!
      Alex

    • By astrobena
      Hey everyone,
      Over the past few days i've been gathering data on M31 due to the battery not lasting long and andomeda dissapearing behind a tree, therefore the mulitple imaging sessions. So far i've been out and me being me, only took dark, bias and light frames for the first 2 sessions but for the last one i also included flats... (The lights all have very slightly different settings cause i have been experimenting slightly... that being 45sec @ ISO 400, 45sec @ ISO 200 and 50sec @ ISO 100) Now DSS assinged all the correct bias and dark frames to the corresponding light frames but because i only have flats for my last imaging session it applied those to all the different light frames and not just to the last set...(and due to me moving the telescope / taking the camera off, the dust spots have obviously been moving around and that therefor dont work at all for the other light frames...) So my question: Is there any way in DSS to apply flats to only one set of light frames and if not are there any other apps with which i can do this with?
      Many Thanks!
    • By Stub Mandrel
      Back from a break 🙂
      A productive evening was  the 22 November. I have a strange field of view at home, so along session means I get data on several targets, and at this time of year I often can't revisit for more data. This means these images need to be seen as 'works in progress' that will need more subs adding in the future. Also, I've used Jpegs because my broadband is playing up some of the subtleties are lost (he claimed!) 😞
      All Baader narrowband filters, except the Plieades, ZWO RGB. 130P-DS, ASI1600MM-pro and HEQ5
      The Tadpoles NGC1983 in Hubble Palette:

      The California Nebula HSO, with the S from an evening a few weeks later. No Oiii under my skies. The FOV is a bit limiting with this setup:

      Which do you prefer? Pacman in Hubble (SHO) and HSO, in contrast these are crops from a larger frame:


      Finally, the Pleiades in RGB, knocked off at the end of along evening so just 75-second subs and not very deep:

      All in all, a worthwhile evening, even if my Witch Head was a complete fail and these do need more data next year 🤞
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.