Jump to content

stargazine_ep34_banner.thumb.jpg.28dd32d9305c7de9b6591e6bf6600b27.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have taken mono LRGB images of M51 with my new ASI1600mm-PRO.

I have a mix of 30s, 60s, 120s subs. 100 darks, and 100 flats for each filter. About 4 hours total.

I Used DSS for alignment and stacking, then Pixinsight for LRGB combination.

My issue is that i'm not happy with the colours, the stars all appear white and the background is strange.

I have attached the Aligned LRGB images.

Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks!

image.png.5054a159ee91138d63c3fb88710136d6.png

Green.TIF red.TIF Lum.TIF B.TIF

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I downloaded your data, and it seems that you have some calibration and stacking errors. For one, your luminance has an inverted vignetting pattern. Are your calibration files working ok? With cmos cameras, your darks MUST match your lights in temperature and exposure time. If you use 3 different exposure times, you need 3 different darks. Scaling darks doesn't work.

I'm processing your data, and will get back with the results.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, wimvb said:

I downloaded your data, and it seems that you have some calibration and stacking errors. For one, your luminance has an inverted vignetting pattern. Are your calibration files working ok? With cmos cameras, your darks MUST match your lights in temperature and exposure time. If you use 3 different exposure times, you need 3 different darks. Scaling darks doesn't work.

I'm processing your data, and will get back with the results.

Hi, all images are taken at -20. I have dark's for all my light exposure times. 

I will investigate the inverted vignetting, and double check DSS to make sure its using the correct files.

Thanks for you help!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't get colour calibration working. The histogram also shows that your R and B masters are identical. Can you check that the stacking process produced the correct output.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, wimvb said:

I can't get colour calibration working. The histogram also shows that your R and B masters are identical. Can you check that the stacking process produced the correct output.

Okay, interesting... I will regenerate them more carefully and repost them. Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, wimvb said:

I can't get colour calibration working. The histogram also shows that your R and B masters are identical. Can you check that the stacking process produced the correct output.

Hi, I have generated new LRGB from DSS. As far as I can tell, they are using the correct files.

B.TIF G.TIF R.TIF L.TIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

m51_lrgb.thumb.jpg.992372377a519e0424df796194728dc6.jpg

A bit noisy. Cmos works best with LOTS of subs. Try to collect at least 100 L subs. You can collect fewer rgb and blur the rgb image before lrgb combination.

My process in short:

  • aligned the new r, g, and b masters with the first L master. The newest L has subs that were rotated too much, so I used the old L
  • cropped L and R, G, B masters, then applied DBE to all.
  • rgb combination

RGB:

  • background neutralization
  • photometric color calibration
  • arcsinh stretch
  • desaturated the background with a range mask to protect the galaxy and stars
  • convolution 
  • saturation enhancement

L:

  • deconvolution
  • histogram transformation
  • hrd compression
  • curves transformation

LRGB combination

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, wimvb said:

m51_lrgb.thumb.jpg.992372377a519e0424df796194728dc6.jpg

A bit noisy. Cmos works best with LOTS of subs. Try to collect at least 100 L subs. You can collect fewer rgb and blur the rgb image before lrgb combination.

My process in short:

  • aligned the new r, g, and b masters with the first L master. The newest L has subs that were rotated too much, so I used the old L
  • cropped L and R, G, B masters, then applied DBE to all.
  • rgb combination

RGB:

  • background neutralization
  • photometric color calibration
  • arcsinh stretch
  • desaturated the background with a range mask to protect the galaxy and stars
  • convolution 
  • saturation enhancement

L:

  • deconvolution
  • histogram transformation
  • hrd compression
  • curves transformation

LRGB combination

Okay :) Great result! Yes I agree, more subs.

I shall try your process. Still a lot more to learn but I'm getting there.

Thanks for the help, it means a lot!

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, chriscoles said:

Yes I agree, more subs.

A rule of thumb that I use is that if the main target looks noisy when only stf applied, but otherwise still linear, then more or longer subs are needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 12/04/2020 at 23:34, wimvb said:

A rule of thumb that I use is that if the main target looks noisy when only stf applied, but otherwise still linear, then more or longer subs are needed.

Okay, so last night was clear :) And I have more subs. I have stacked them again. I also took more darks for good measure.

I combined the channels in Pixinsight, however don't yet know how to bring the colours out...?

Using the gimp I can, though would like to do it all in PI eventually.

I tried Photometry-Based Color Calibration but got errors, see below.?

Getting there... Thanks!

image.thumb.png.bf21e0e66b8db402f0a1d9cbda85c901.png

 

B_new.TIF G_new.TIF R_new.TIF L_new.TIF

 

 

 

image.png

 

 

Edited by chriscoles
repeated images
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you need to enter your pixel size and fl for plate solving to work.

After colour calibration, stretch the rgb with arcsinh stretch. This preserves and boosts colour.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, what a great image 🙂 

I think I too need to drastically improve my processing. I think with me it just takes so long at the moment, mostly because I always have to follow some instructions as I cannot remember what to do off my own back. I guess if you practice and you understand fully what you are doing instead of blindly following some instructions written by others then it will both be quicker to process and the results will improve.

I have just purchased this great guide for PI. Whilst it will not give me great images immediately I think it will greatly help me in the long run. I don't know whether it is something that may help you ?

 http://www.deepskycolors.com/mastering-pixinsight.html

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

it just takes so long at the moment, mostly because I always have to follow some instructions as I cannot remember what to do off my own back

That's how I started too.

3 hours ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

I guess if you practice and you understand fully what you are doing instead of blindly following some instructions written by others then it will both be quicker to process and the results will improve

Yes, it just takes time.

 

3 hours ago, teoria_del_big_bang said:

I don't know whether it is something that may help you ?

 http://www.deepskycolors.com/mastering-pixinsight.html

Steve

It definitely will. Study not just the processes, but also the PI methodology: an image consists of lightness zones, and also levels of detail, called wavelets or layers. The layer concept of PI has nothing to do with the layer concept of PS/GIMP.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the book recommendation, for now i'm quite happy playing around with PI. May look at books when I get deeper into it.

Made improvements to my image, and because of all the clear nights I have started on the Cigar Galaxy too.

 

image.thumb.png.26a2c29bee23725e13650ed5f5f19c94.png

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stub Mandrel
      Back from a break 🙂
      A productive evening was  the 22 November. I have a strange field of view at home, so along session means I get data on several targets, and at this time of year I often can't revisit for more data. This means these images need to be seen as 'works in progress' that will need more subs adding in the future. Also, I've used Jpegs because my broadband is playing up some of the subtleties are lost (he claimed!) 😞
      All Baader narrowband filters, except the Plieades, ZWO RGB. 130P-DS, ASI1600MM-pro and HEQ5
      The Tadpoles NGC1983 in Hubble Palette:

      The California Nebula HSO, with the S from an evening a few weeks later. No Oiii under my skies. The FOV is a bit limiting with this setup:

      Which do you prefer? Pacman in Hubble (SHO) and HSO, in contrast these are crops from a larger frame:


      Finally, the Pleiades in RGB, knocked off at the end of along evening so just 75-second subs and not very deep:

      All in all, a worthwhile evening, even if my Witch Head was a complete fail and these do need more data next year 🤞
       
       
    • By dazza1639
      2020 hasn’t been a great year for anyone, but we’ve had a good comet, and some clear nights. I haven’t been the most productive, or even a very good imager this year, but I’m quite pleased with what I’ve learnt, narrowband has been a revelation . So I thought I would share a few of my images, and a video I put together or them. Thanks for all the great images and tips that have been posted. Wishing you all a happy Christmas and a great 2021.
      Darren
       

       
    • By EMG
      Recently I bought a ZWO ASI178MM for planetary/lunar/deep-sky imaging and last weekend i had clear skies so I was able to capture videos of the moon in two panels. I have already processed the videos in AutoStakkert, I used 3x drizzle because I intend to print the image so now I have two 120MB TIFF images that i would like to combine in a two panel mosaic. I tried doing it in Hugin, a free panorama stitcher but the program crashes due to the file sizes being too large. I have searched for tutorials on using DynamicAlignment in PixInsight but it seems to me that i'll need a reference image to be able to create mosaics in PixInsight. Is there any way to go about this, I feel like this should be a pretty straightforward job but I am not very experienced in PI so I would really appreciate some advice.
       
      I tried using DynamicAlignment as you can see in the attached screenshot but the result was just a cut version of the target image, aligned perfectly to the source image. It would be perfect if it didn't cut off the lower part of the target image.

    • By SeBasstian
      I have a huge problem with DSS.
      About a week ago, I took 300, 2 second long exposures of Andromeda with my skywatcher 90/900.
      But when DSS started scanning the stars in the images, it only registered about 5 stars at 40%. And only 7 stars at 20%. I tried to stack them and selected stack 100% of frames, but it only stacked around 29.
      I even tried it at 4% where it registered around 40 stars, but DSS crashed mid process due to the immense amount of stars being scanned (60 000 per image at least). 
      I tried it sooooo many times, but I don't get it to work. It somehow stacked 131 images I took of the lagune nebula (1 second lang exposure). You couldn't see the actual nebula, but some bright stars were there and DSS was able to stack. 
      In the Andromeda pics, there were like 5 times more stars, but it didn't work. 
      If anyone knows what's wrong, pls help me!!! I'm slowly loosing it on that nonsense. 
    • By vpsj
      I'm trying to stack 240 light frames of Milky Way taken from quite a light polluted area.
      I tried to stack them in DSS. The Milky Way seems to have been stacked okay, but the surrounding stars look like they've been deliberately dimmed or brushed over.
      I thought there was something wrong with my frames but when I used the same frames in Sequator, it's working fine.

      I've attached both the images below, and I have exaggerated them a lot on Lightroom just to see how much details I could pull out. Sequator one seems to have too many weird light bands(?) but I think I can fix them using an adjustment brush. But look at how many stars Sequator is able to show compared to DSS.

      DSS image:  The settings I've tried on DSS and yet nothing changed:
      1) Tried in Standard, Mosaic both
      2) Tried both Sigma Clipping, and Auto Adaptive Average(These two were recommended by DSS)
      3) Hot pixel detection and removal (tried it with enabled and disabled)
      4) Nothing enabled in the cosmetics tab
      5) Tried with and without Flat frames
      6) Star Detection Threshold: Tried from a range of 50 stars to 300 stars. Even manually checked to see if DSS was picking any noise as star(it wasn't).

      If I try with less than 30 light frames, DSS does an okayish job and the stars in the rest of the image still look like stars, but then the Milky Way has no details to pull out, unless I stack a lot more shots.

      Can anyone please tell me what am I doing wrong in the case of DSS that it's doing such a poor job for the surrounding stars? If you guys need me to upload some Raw light frames I will do so as well. Any advice and suggestions are welcome. Thank you

      EXIF info:
      Camera: Nikon D3100, with 18-55mm kit lens
      Exposure Settings: F/3.5, ISO 3200, 15s x 240 frames, 18mm focal length, no tracker
      50 Darks, 50 Bias and 50 Flat frames.
      DSS version: 4.2.3


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.